The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Kunio Doi to Mammography

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Kunio Doi has written about Mammography.
Connection Strength

5.158
  1. Usefulness of presentation of similar images in the diagnosis of breast masses on mammograms: comparison of observer performances in Japan and the USA. Radiol Phys Technol. 2013 Jan; 6(1):70-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.342
  2. Evaluation of objective similarity measures for selecting similar images of mammographic lesions. J Digit Imaging. 2011 Feb; 24(1):75-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.307
  3. Potential usefulness of similar images in the differential diagnosis of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. Radiology. 2009 Dec; 253(3):625-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.280
  4. Determination of similarity measures for pairs of mass lesions on mammograms by use of BI-RADS lesion descriptors and image features. Acad Radiol. 2009 Apr; 16(4):443-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.271
  5. Observer study for evaluating potential utility of a super-high-resolution LCD in the detection of clustered microcalcifications on digital mammograms. J Digit Imaging. 2010 Apr; 23(2):161-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.270
  6. Investigation of psychophysical similarity measures for selection of similar images in the diagnosis of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. Med Phys. 2008 Dec; 35(12):5695-702.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.265
  7. An improved computer-aided diagnosis scheme using the nearest neighbor criterion for determining histological classification of clustered microcalcifications. Methods Inf Med. 2007; 46(6):716-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.232
  8. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for identifying histological classification of clustered microcalcifications by use of follow-up magnification mammograms. Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct; 13(10):1219-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.228
  9. Experimental determination of subjective similarity for pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: observer study results. Med Phys. 2006 Sep; 33(9):3460-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.226
  10. Investigation of psychophysical measure for evaluation of similar images for mammographic masses: preliminary results. Med Phys. 2005 Jul; 32(7):2295-304.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.209
  11. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for histological classification of clustered microcalcifications on magnification mammograms. Med Phys. 2004 Apr; 31(4):789-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  12. Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications. Radiology. 2001 Sep; 220(3):787-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  13. Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology: potential and pitfalls. Eur J Radiol. 1999 Aug; 31(2):97-109.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  14. Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol. 1999 Jan; 6(1):22-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  15. A genetic algorithm-based method for optimizing the performance of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms. Med Phys. 1998 Sep; 25(9):1613-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  16. Analysis of methods for reducing false positives in the automated detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms. Med Phys. 1998 Aug; 25(8):1502-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  17. Optimally weighted wavelet transform based on supervised training for detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Med Phys. 1998 Jun; 25(6):949-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  18. Automated computerized classification of malignant and benign masses on digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol. 1998 Mar; 5(3):155-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  19. Density correction of peripheral breast tissue on digital mammograms. Radiographics. 1996 Nov; 16(6):1403-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  20. Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification. Radiology. 1996 Mar; 198(3):671-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  21. Automated segmentation of digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol. 1995 Jan; 2(1):1-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  22. Representation of lesion similarity by use of multidimensional scaling for breast masses on mammograms. J Digit Imaging. 2013 Aug; 26(4):740-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  23. Computer-aided diagnosis: development of automated schemes for quantitative analysis of radiographic images. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1992 Apr; 13(2):140-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  24. [Science of similar images: quantitative evaluation on the similarity of images to be used in the next generation CAD]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2011; 67(4):400-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  25. Presentation of similar images as a reference for distinction between benign and malignant masses on mammograms: analysis of initial observer study. J Digit Imaging. 2010 Oct; 23(5):592-602.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  26. An investigation of radiologists' perception of lesion similarity: observations with paired breast masses on mammograms and paired lung nodules on CT images. Acad Radiol. 2008 Jul; 15(7):887-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  27. Usefulness of texture analysis for computerized classification of breast lesions on mammograms. J Digit Imaging. 2007 Sep; 20(3):248-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  28. Determination of subjective similarity for pairs of masses and pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: comparison of similarity ranking scores and absolute similarity ratings. Med Phys. 2007 Jul; 34(7):2890-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  29. Monte Carlo simulation studies of backscatter factors in mammography. Radiology. 1981 Apr; 139(1):195-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  30. Evaluation of absorbed dose in mammography: monte carlo simulation studies. Radiology. 1980 Apr; 135(1):199-208.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  31. An improved computer-assisted diagnostic scheme using wavelet transform for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Acad Radiol. 1996 Aug; 3(8):621-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  32. An improved shift-invariant artificial neural network for computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Med Phys. 1996 Apr; 23(4):595-601.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  33. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications on digital mammograms. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1995 Mar; 33(2):174-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  34. Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications: evaluation of performance on mammograms from multiple centers. Radiographics. 1995 Mar; 15(2):443-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  35. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in mammography: reduction of false-positive clustered microcalcifications using local edge-gradient analysis. Med Phys. 1995 Feb; 22(2):161-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  36. Potential usefulness of digital imaging in clinical diagnostic radiology: computer-aided diagnosis. J Digit Imaging. 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):2-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  37. Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms using a shift-invariant artificial neural network. Med Phys. 1994 Apr; 21(4):517-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  38. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: automated alignment of breast images and its effect on bilateral-subtraction technique. Med Phys. 1994 Mar; 21(3):445-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  39. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: investigation of feature-analysis techniques. J Digit Imaging. 1994 Feb; 7(1):18-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  40. Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. Med Phys. 1994 Feb; 21(2):265-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  41. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications: an improved method for grouping detected signals. Med Phys. 1993 Nov-Dec; 20(6):1661-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  42. Comparison of bilateral-subtraction and single-image processing techniques in the computerized detection of mammographic masses. Invest Radiol. 1993 Jun; 28(6):473-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  43. Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology. 1993 Apr; 187(1):81-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  44. Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms: applications of artificial neural networks. Med Phys. 1992 May-Jun; 19(3):555-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  45. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images. Med Phys. 1991 Sep-Oct; 18(5):955-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  46. Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis. Invest Radiol. 1990 Oct; 25(10):1102-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  47. Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiology. J Thorac Imaging. 1990 Jan; 5(1):67-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  48. Computer-aided detection of microcalcifications in mammograms. Methodology and preliminary clinical study. Invest Radiol. 1988 Sep; 23(9):664-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  49. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. I. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography. Med Phys. 1987 Jul-Aug; 14(4):538-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  50. Ultra-high-strip-density radiographic grids: a new antiscatter technique for mammography. Radiology. 1985 Mar; 154(3):807-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  51. Experimental and theoretical energy and angular dependencies of scattered radiation in the mammography energy range. Med Phys. 1983 Sep-Oct; 10(5):664-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  52. Magnification film mammography: image quality and clinical studies. Radiology. 1977 Oct; 125(1):69-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  53. Image quality in mammography. Radiology. 1977 Oct; 125(1):77-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  54. Determination of X-ray spectra incident on and transmitted through breast tissue. Radiology. 1977 Aug; 124(2):511-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  55. An "intelligent" workstation for computer-aided diagnosis. Radiographics. 1993 May; 13(3):647-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  56. Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications. Invest Radiol. 1987 Jul; 22(7):581-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  57. The effect of geometric and recording system unsharpness in mammography. Invest Radiol. 1975 Jan-Feb; 10(1):43-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.