The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Parth Modi and Ted Skolarus.
Connection Strength

4.881
  1. Task Shifting and Task Sharing in Surgical Care. Ann Surg Open. 2025 Sep; 6(3):e603.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.925
  2. Rising Active Surveillance/Observation Rates and Regimen Intensification in Young Men: A Retrospective Cohort Study of National Commercial Health Insurance Claims Data. Urology. 2026 Sep 01.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.248
  3. Trans-perineal prostate biopsy-Prognostic factors for "no prostate tissue" in biopsy cores. Urol Oncol. 2026 Oct; 44(10):783-788.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.247
  4. Understanding what surgical advanced practice providers want: A survey of autonomy, tasks, and training preferences across three institutions. Am J Surg. 2026 Sep; 259:116992.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.241
  5. Reply by Authors. Urol Pract. 2025 Nov; 12(6):778.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  6. Urological Procedures and Impact on Advanced Practice Provider Burnout, Job Satisfaction, and Salary: AUA Census Analysis. Urol Pract. 2025 Nov; 12(6):769-778.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.231
  7. Turnover Among Early-Career Advanced Practice Clinicians. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 01; 8(5):e258638.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.226
  8. Turnover Among Early Career Advanced Practice Providers in Urology. Urology. 2025 Sep; 203:16-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.223
  9. Urologic oncology case volume among early career urologists: An analysis of certification data from the American board of urology between 2003 and 2019. Urol Oncol. 2025 05; 43(5):335.e9-335.e15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.217
  10. Utilization and Timing of Cystoscopy for Hematuria Evaluation by Advanced Practice Providers and Urologists. Urology. 2024 06; 188:80-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.211
  11. Industry Payments for Vibegron and Prescribing Patterns Among Urologic Clinicians. JAMA Health Forum. 2023 12 01; 4(12):e234020.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.205
  12. Using Implementation Science to Improve Patient Care. J Urol. 2023 10; 210(4):577-579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.201
  13. Industry Payments to Urologists and Urologic Advanced Practice Providers in 2021. Urology. 2023 10; 180:121-129.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  14. Outcomes of Hematuria Evaluation by Advanced Practice Providers and Urologists. Urology. 2023 08; 178:67-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.197
  15. Urology Workforce Changes and Implications for Prostate Cancer Care Among Medicare Enrollees. Urology. 2021 09; 155:77-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  16. Urologist practice structure and quality of prostate cancer care. Urol Pract. 2020 Sep; 7(5):419-424.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  17. Reframing Financial Incentives Around Reducing Readmission After Radical Cystectomy. Urology. 2020 08; 142:99-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  18. Practice-Level Adoption of Conservative Management for Prostate Cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2019 10; 15(10):e863-e869.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  19. Urologist Practice Structure and Spending for Prostate Cancer Care. Urology. 2019 Aug; 130:65-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  20. Variation in prostate cancer treatment and spending among Medicare shared savings program accountable care organizations. Cancer. 2018 08; 124(16):3364-3371.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  21. Long-term patient-reported outcomes and toxicity following salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Cancer. 2026 Sep 15; 132(18):e70609.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  22. Adherence and out-of-pocket costs among Medicare beneficiaries who are prescribed oral targeted therapies for advanced prostate cancer. Cancer. 2020 12 01; 126(23):5050-5059.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  23. Adoption of Abiraterone and Enzalutamide by Urologists. Urology. 2019 09; 131:176-183.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.