The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

John H.R. Maunsell to Male

This is a "connection" page, showing publications John H.R. Maunsell has written about Male.
Connection Strength

0.872
  1. Perceptual Weighting of V1 Spikes Revealed by Optogenetic White Noise Stimulation. J Neurosci. 2022 04 13; 42(15):3122-3132.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  2. Single trial neuronal activity dynamics of attentional intensity in monkey visual area V4. Nat Commun. 2021 03 31; 12(1):2003.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  3. Mice Preferentially Use Increases in Cerebral Cortex Spiking to Detect Changes in Visual Stimuli. J Neurosci. 2020 10 07; 40(41):7902-7920.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  4. The Correlation of Neuronal Signals with Behavior at Different Levels of Visual Cortex and Their Relative Reliability for Behavioral Decisions. J Neurosci. 2020 05 06; 40(19):3751-3767.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  5. Neuronal Effects of Spatial and Feature Attention Differ Due to Normalization. J Neurosci. 2019 07 10; 39(28):5493-5505.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  6. Different Inhibitory Interneuron Cell Classes Make Distinct Contributions to Visual Contrast Perception. eNeuro. 2019 Jan-Feb; 6(1).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  7. Electrical Microstimulation of Visual Cerebral Cortex Elevates Psychophysical Detection Thresholds. eNeuro. 2018 Sep-Oct; 5(5).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  8. Attentional Changes in Either Criterion or Sensitivity Are Associated with Robust Modulations in Lateral Prefrontal Cortex. Neuron. 2018 03 21; 97(6):1382-1393.e7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  9. Spatially tuned normalization explains attention modulation variance within neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2017 09 01; 118(3):1903-1913.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  10. Attention-related changes in correlated neuronal activity arise from normalization mechanisms. Nat Neurosci. 2017 Jul; 20(7):969-977.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  11. Attention operates uniformly throughout the classical receptive field and the surround. Elife. 2016 08 22; 5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  12. Graded Neuronal Modulations Related to Visual Spatial Attention. J Neurosci. 2016 05 11; 36(19):5353-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  13. Neuronal Modulations in Visual Cortex Are Associated with Only One of Multiple Components of Attention. Neuron. 2015 Jun 03; 86(5):1182-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  14. A strong constraint to the joint processing of pairs of cortical signals. J Neurosci. 2012 Nov 07; 32(45):15922-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  15. Potential confounds in estimating trial-to-trial correlations between neuronal response and behavior using choice probabilities. J Neurophysiol. 2012 Dec; 108(12):3403-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  16. Tuned normalization explains the size of attention modulations. Neuron. 2012 Feb 23; 73(4):803-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  17. Psychophysical measurement of contrast sensitivity in the behaving mouse. J Neurophysiol. 2012 Feb; 107(3):758-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  18. When attention wanders: how uncontrolled fluctuations in attention affect performance. J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 02; 31(44):15802-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  19. Network rhythms influence the relationship between spike-triggered local field potential and functional connectivity. J Neurosci. 2011 Aug 31; 31(35):12674-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  20. Using neuronal populations to study the mechanisms underlying spatial and feature attention. Neuron. 2011 Jun 23; 70(6):1192-204.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  21. Effects of stimulus direction on the correlation between behavior and single units in area MT during a motion detection task. J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 01; 31(22):8230-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  22. Different origins of gamma rhythm and high-gamma activity in macaque visual cortex. PLoS Biol. 2011 Apr; 9(4):e1000610.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  23. A neuronal population measure of attention predicts behavioral performance on individual trials. J Neurosci. 2010 Nov 10; 30(45):15241-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  24. Differences in gamma frequencies across visual cortex restrict their possible use in computation. Neuron. 2010 Sep 09; 67(5):885-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  25. Microstimulation reveals limits in detecting different signals from a local cortical region. Curr Biol. 2010 May 11; 20(9):824-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  26. Attentional modulation of MT neurons with single or multiple stimuli in their receptive fields. J Neurosci. 2010 Feb 24; 30(8):3058-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  27. Local cortical function after uncomplicated subdural electrode implantation. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg. 2008 Jan; 108(1):139-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  28. Effects of task difficulty and target likelihood in area V4 of macaque monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 2006 Nov; 96(5):2377-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  29. Effects of spatial attention on contrast response functions in macaque area V4. J Neurophysiol. 2006 Jul; 96(1):40-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  30. Using neuronal latency to determine sensory-motor processing pathways in reaction time tasks. J Neurophysiol. 2005 May; 93(5):2974-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  31. Anterior inferotemporal neurons of monkeys engaged in object recognition can be highly sensitive to object retinal position. J Neurophysiol. 2003 Jun; 89(6):3264-78.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  32. Attentional modulation of behavioral performance and neuronal responses in middle temporal and ventral intraparietal areas of macaque monkey. J Neurosci. 2002 Mar 01; 22(5):1994-2004.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  33. Form representation in monkey inferotemporal cortex is virtually unaltered by free viewing. Nat Neurosci. 2000 Aug; 3(8):814-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  34. Attention to both space and feature modulates neuronal responses in macaque area V4. J Neurophysiol. 2000 Mar; 83(3):1751-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  35. Effects of attention on orientation-tuning functions of single neurons in macaque cortical area V4. J Neurosci. 1999 Jan 01; 19(1):431-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  36. Visual response latencies of magnocellular and parvocellular LGN neurons in macaque monkeys. Vis Neurosci. 1999 Jan-Feb; 16(1):1-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  37. Sensory modality specificity of neural activity related to memory in visual cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1997 Sep; 78(3):1263-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  38. No binocular rivalry in the LGN of alert macaque monkeys. Vision Res. 1996 May; 36(9):1225-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  39. Extraretinal representations in area V4 in the macaque monkey. Vis Neurosci. 1991 Dec; 7(6):561-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  40. Magnocellular and parvocellular contributions to responses in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci. 1990 Oct; 10(10):3323-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  41. Perceiving electrical stimulation of identified human visual areas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 31; 106(13):5389-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  42. Topographic organization of the middle temporal visual area in the macaque monkey: representational biases and the relationship to callosal connections and myeloarchitectonic boundaries. J Comp Neurol. 1987 Dec 22; 266(4):535-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  43. Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation. J Neurophysiol. 1983 May; 49(5):1127-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  44. The projections from striate cortex (V1) to areas V2 and V3 in the macaque monkey: asymmetries, areal boundaries, and patchy connections. J Comp Neurol. 1986 Feb 22; 244(4):451-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.