The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

John Edward A. Blair to Prospective Studies

This is a "connection" page, showing publications John Edward A. Blair has written about Prospective Studies.
Connection Strength

0.257
  1. Coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2018 05 01; 314(5):H1033-H1042.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  2. Changes in renal function during hospitalization and soon after discharge in patients admitted for worsening heart failure in the placebo group of the EVEREST trial. Eur Heart J. 2011 Oct; 32(20):2563-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  3. Continental differences in clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes in patients hospitalized with worsening heart failure results from the EVEREST (Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure: Outcome Study with Tolvaptan) program. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 11; 52(20):1640-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  4. Quantitative detection of changes in regional wall motion using real time strain-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 02; 66:193-198.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  5. Peak left atrial strain as a single measure for the non-invasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressures. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jan; 35(1):23-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  6. Use of hand carried ultrasound, B-type natriuretic peptide, and clinical assessment in identifying abnormal left ventricular filling pressures in patients referred for right heart catheterization. J Card Fail. 2010 Jan; 16(1):69-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  7. Comparison of hand-carried ultrasound assessment of the inferior vena cava and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide for predicting readmission after hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Sep; 1(5):595-601.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.