The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

William Dobyns to Genes, Dominant

This is a "connection" page, showing publications William Dobyns has written about Genes, Dominant.
Connection Strength

0.341
  1. Cerebellar ataxia with progressive improvement. Arch Neurol. 2006 Apr; 63(4):594-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  2. The pattern of inheritance of X-linked traits is not dominant or recessive, just X-linked. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006 Apr; 95(451):11-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  3. Homonucleotide expansion and contraction mutations of PAX2 and inclusion of Chiari 1 malformation as part of renal-coloboma syndrome. Hum Mutat. 1999; 14(5):369-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  4. Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia (SCA6) associated with small polyglutamine expansions in the alpha 1A-voltage-dependent calcium channel. Nat Genet. 1997 Jan; 15(1):62-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  5. Autosomal dominant torsion dystonia with onset in infancy. Pediatr Neurol. 1996 Oct; 15(3):245-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  6. Autosomal dominant optic nerve colobomas, vesicoureteral reflux, and renal anomalies. Am J Med Genet. 1995 Nov 06; 59(2):204-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  7. Linkage to chromosome 2q36.1 in autosomal dominant Dandy-Walker malformation with occipital cephalocele and evidence for genetic heterogeneity. Hum Genet. 2008 Apr; 123(3):237-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  8. Familial cavernous malformations of the central nervous system and retina. Ann Neurol. 1987 Jun; 21(6):578-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  9. Mutation of the PAX2 gene in a family with optic nerve colobomas, renal anomalies and vesicoureteral reflux. Nat Genet. 1995 Apr; 9(4):358-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  10. Evidence for genetic heterogeneity in tuberous sclerosis: one locus on chromosome 9 and at least one locus elsewhere. Am J Hum Genet. 1992 Oct; 51(4):709-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.