The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

David Moskowitz to Humans

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications David Moskowitz has written about Humans.
David Moskowitz
Connection Strength
0.470
Humans
  1. What Chicago community organizations needed to implement COVID-19 interventions: lessons learned in 2021. Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1221170.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  2. 'Oh, I don't really want to bother with that:' gay and bisexual young men's perceptions of barriers to PrEP information and uptake. Cult Health Sex. 2022 11; 24(11):1548-1562.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  3. Top, Bottom, and Versatile Orientations among Adolescent Sexual Minority Men. J Sex Res. 2022 May-Jun; 59(5):643-651.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  4. The PrEP Cascade in a National Cohort of Adolescent Men Who Have Sex With Men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021 04 15; 86(5):536-543.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  5. What If My Dad Finds Out!?: Assessing Adolescent Men Who Have Sex with Men's Perceptions About Parents as Barriers to PrEP Uptake. AIDS Behav. 2020 Sep; 24(9):2703-2719.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  6. PrEP Awareness, Uptake, Barriers, and Correlates Among Adolescents Assigned Male at Birth Who Have Sex with Males in the U.S. Arch Sex Behav. 2020 01; 49(1):113-124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  7. Top, Bottom, and Versatile Anal Sex Roles in Same-Sex Male Relationships: Implications for Relationship and Sexual Satisfaction. Arch Sex Behav. 2019 05; 48(4):1217-1225.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  8. Comparing the Healthcare Utilization and Engagement in a Sample of Transgender and Cisgender Bisexual+ Persons. Arch Sex Behav. 2019 01; 48(1):255-260.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  9. Recognition and Construction of Top, Bottom, and Versatile Orientations in Gay/Bisexual Men. Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Jan; 46(1):273-285.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  10. Physical, behavioral, and psychological traits of gay men identifying as bears. Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Jul; 42(5):775-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  11. The eroticism of Internet cruising as a self-contained behaviour: a multivariate analysis of men seeking men demographics and getting off online. Cult Health Sex. 2013; 15(5):555-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  12. The influence of physical body traits and masculinity on anal sex roles in gay and bisexual men. Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Aug; 40(4):835-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  13. HIV in the leather community: rates and risk-related behaviors. AIDS Behav. 2011 Apr; 15(3):557-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  14. Self-esteem in HIV-positive and HIV-negative gay and bisexual men: implications for risk-taking behaviors with casual sex partners. AIDS Behav. 2011 Apr; 15(3):621-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  15. Revisiting obesity and condom use in men who have sex with men. Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Jun; 39(3):761-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  16. PowerON: the use of instant message counseling and the Internet to facilitate HIV/STD education and prevention. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Oct; 77(1):20-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  17. Moderators of sexual behavior in gay men. Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Aug; 39(4):950-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  18. Vengeance, HIV disclosure, and perceived HIV transmission to others. AIDS Behav. 2008 Sep; 12(5):721-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  19. The existence of a bug chasing subculture. Cult Health Sex. 2007 Jul-Aug; 9(4):347-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  20. Delivering COVID-19 Vaccine via Trusted Social Services: Program Evaluation Results from the Chicagoland CEAL Program. J Community Health. 2024 Feb; 49(1):61-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  21. "I don't see myself represented:" Strategies and considerations for engaging gay male Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander teens in research and HIV prevention services. AIDS Behav. 2023 Apr; 27(4):1055-1067.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  22. Effectiveness of the SMART Sex Ed program among 13-18 year old English and Spanish speaking adolescent men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2023 Feb; 27(2):733-744.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  23. Perspectives on Cigarette Use, Vaping, and Antitobacco Campaigns Among Adolescent Sexual Minority Males and Gender Diverse Youth. LGBT Health. 2022 Oct; 9(7):479-488.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  24. Identifying leaks in the STEM recruitment pipeline among sexual and gender minority US secondary students. PLoS One. 2022; 17(6):e0268769.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  25. Cigarette Use and Vaping Among Sexual and Gender Minority (SGM) Adolescents Assigned Male at Birth: Patterns of Use and Associations with Demographic and Psychosocial Factors. Int J Behav Med. 2022 Oct; 29(5):685-690.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  26. "Safe Behind My Screen": Adolescent Sexual Minority Males' Perceptions of Safety and Trustworthiness on Geosocial and Social Networking Apps. Arch Sex Behav. 2021 10; 50(7):2965-2980.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  27. "It's Very Inconvenient for Me": A Mixed-Method Study Assessing Barriers and Facilitators of Adolescent Sexual Minority Males Attending PrEP Follow-Up Appointments. AIDS Behav. 2022 Jan; 26(1):21-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  28. Patterns of Online and Offline Partnering, Partnership Characteristics, and Condomless Sex Among Adolescent Sexual Minority Males in the USA. AIDS Behav. 2021 Jul; 25(7):2033-2045.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  29. Using Intervention Mapping to Developmentally Adapt an Online HIV Risk Reduction Program for Adolescent Men Who Have Sex with Men. Prev Sci. 2020 10; 21(7):885-897.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  30. Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Influences on Sexual Satisfaction in Young Male Couples: Analyses of Actor-Partner Interdependence Models. J Sex Res. 2021 02; 58(2):183-194.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  31. Factors Associated With HIV Testing in Teenage Men Who Have Sex With Men. Pediatrics. 2020 03; 145(3).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  32. Geosocial Networking Application Use, Characteristics of App-Met Sexual Partners, and Sexual Behavior Among Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents Assigned Male at Birth. J Sex Res. 2020 10; 57(8):1078-1087.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  33. Measuring Acceptability and Engagement of The Keep It Up! Internet-Based HIV Prevention Randomized Controlled Trial for Young Men Who Have Sex With Men. AIDS Educ Prev. 2019 08; 31(4):287-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  34. Exploring anal self-examination as a screening tool for women at risk for anal cancer: awareness, interest, and barriers to behavioral uptake. Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Jun; 30(6):559-568.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  35. Hookup App Use, Sexual Behavior, and Sexual Health Among Adolescent Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States. J Adolesc Health. 2018 06; 62(6):708-715.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  36. Scenes as Micro-Cultures: Examining Heterogeneity of HIV Risk Behavior Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men in Toronto, Canada. Arch Sex Behav. 2018 01; 47(1):309-321.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  37. The role of media and the Internet on vaccine adverse event reporting: a case study of human papillomavirus vaccination. J Adolesc Health. 2014 Mar; 54(3):289-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  38. Relationship factors associated with gay male couples' concordance on aspects of their sexual agreements: establishment, type, and adherence. AIDS Behav. 2012 Aug; 16(6):1560-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  39. The cumulative effects of medication use, drug use, and smoking on erectile dysfunction among men who have sex with men. J Sex Med. 2012 Apr; 9(4):1106-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  40. Sex typicality and attractiveness in childhood and adulthood: assessing their relationships from videos. Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Feb; 40(1):143-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.