The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Gaurav Upadhyay to Heart Failure

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Gaurav Upadhyay has written about Heart Failure.
Gaurav Upadhyay
Connection Strength
5.188
Heart Failure
  1. The evolution of conduction system pacing and gaps in understanding. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2025 Jul-Aug; 91:113-120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.420
  2. Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing in patients with mid-range ejection fraction. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan; 68(1):111-116.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.396
  3. Physiologic Pacing Targeting the His Bundle and Left Bundle Branch: a Review of the Literature. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 08; 24(8):959-978.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.340
  4. Population-Level Impact of the Guidelines Update on Patient Selection and Outcomes After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 05; 8(5):651-661.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.335
  5. Left Bundle Branch Block: Characterization, Definitions, and Recent Insights into Conduction System Physiology. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2021 12; 13(4):671-684.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.328
  6. Bradyarrhythmias and Physiologic Pacing in the ICU. J Intensive Care Med. 2022 May; 37(5):595-610.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.313
  7. Keeping pace with the competition: His bundle versus biventricular pacing in heart failure. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2020 05; 35(3):295-307.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.294
  8. On-treatment comparison between corrective His bundle pacing and biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization: A secondary analysis of the His-SYNC Pilot Trial. Heart Rhythm. 2019 12; 16(12):1797-1807.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.275
  9. His Corrective Pacing or Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization in Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 07 09; 74(1):157-159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.275
  10. Right Ventricular Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Devices. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2018 03; 10(1):31-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.249
  11. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Heart Failure in the DEFEAT-HF Study: Lost Battle or Lasting Opportunities? JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Feb; 4(2):137-139.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.218
  12. Managing atrial fibrillation in the CRT patient: controversy or consensus? Heart Rhythm. 2012 Aug; 9(8 Suppl):S51-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  13. Making a splash? -Intrathoracic impedance and the prediction of arrhythmic events.-. Circ J. 2011; 75(11):2539-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  14. Optimal pace timing for left bundle branch area pacing with or without an additional LV lead: results from the CSPOT study. Europace. 2026 May 06; 28(5).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  15. Frailty and risk of death without device therapy among patients with primary prophylaxis implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: The CERTITUDE Registry. Heart Rhythm. 2026 06; 23(6):e930-e939.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  16. Left bundle branch area pacing compared with biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction =50%: Results from the International Collaborative LBBAP Study (I-CLAS). Heart Rhythm. 2025 08; 22(8):2028-2037.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  17. Conduction system pacing compared with biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: Results from International Collaborative LBBAP Study (I-CLAS) Group. Heart Rhythm. 2025 06; 22(6):1512-1522.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  18. Left Bundle Branch Block: Characterization, Definitions, and Recent Insights into Conduction System Physiology. Cardiol Clin. 2023 Aug; 41(3):379-391.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  19. 2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure. Heart Rhythm. 2023 09; 20(9):e17-e91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  20. Rescue left bundle branch area pacing in coronary venous lead failure or nonresponse to biventricular pacing: Results from International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group. Heart Rhythm. 2022 08; 19(8):1272-1280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  21. Left ventricle and mitral valve reverse remodeling in response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Echocardiography. 2020 10; 37(10):1557-1565.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  22. Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Systems. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 04 03; 71(13):1483-1493.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  23. Pushing and recognizing the limits of nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A valuable "negative" trial. Heart Rhythm. 2018 06; 15(6):877-878.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  24. Characterization of Ventricular Tachycardia After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation as Destination Therapy: A Single-Center Ablation Experience. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 12 11; 3(12):1412-1424.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  25. Cause of death and CRT device selection: striving for certitude? Eur Heart J. 2015 Nov 01; 36(41):2777-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  26. Renal Response in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Predicts Outcome Following Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Oct; 38(10):1192-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  27. Pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dilation predict clinical outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Jun; 2(3):230-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  28. Device-measured physical activity versus six-minute walk test as a predictor of reverse remodeling and outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2014 May 01; 113(9):1523-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  29. Impact of myocardial viability and left ventricular lead location on clinical outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 May; 25(5):507-513.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  30. Usefulness and consequences of cardiac resynchronization therapy in dialysis-dependent patients with heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2013 Nov 15; 112(10):1625-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  31. Right ventricular lead adjustment in cardiac resynchronization therapy and acute hemodynamic response: a pilot study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013 Apr; 36(3):223-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  32. Electrical delay in apically positioned left ventricular leads and clinical outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Feb; 24(2):182-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  33. Multidisciplinary care of patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Eur Heart J. 2012 Sep; 33(17):2181-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  34. Multicenter Hemodynamic Assessment of the LOT-CRT Strategy: When Does Combining Left Bundle Branch Pacing and Coronary Venous Pacing Enhance Resynchronization?: Primary Results of the CSPOT Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024 Nov; 17(11):e013059.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  35. QRS morphology, left ventricular lead location, and clinical outcome in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2013 Aug; 34(29):2252-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.