Gaurav Upadhyay to Heart Failure
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Gaurav Upadhyay has written about Heart Failure.
Connection Strength
4.852
-
Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing in patients with mid-range ejection fraction. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan; 68(1):111-116.
Score: 0.432
-
Physiologic Pacing Targeting the His Bundle and Left Bundle Branch: a Review of the Literature. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 08; 24(8):959-978.
Score: 0.371
-
Population-Level Impact of the Guidelines Update on Patient Selection and Outcomes After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 05; 8(5):651-661.
Score: 0.366
-
Left Bundle Branch Block: Characterization, Definitions, and Recent Insights into Conduction System Physiology. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2021 12; 13(4):671-684.
Score: 0.358
-
Bradyarrhythmias and Physiologic Pacing in the ICU. J Intensive Care Med. 2022 May; 37(5):595-610.
Score: 0.342
-
Keeping pace with the competition: His bundle versus biventricular pacing in heart failure. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2020 05; 35(3):295-307.
Score: 0.321
-
On-treatment comparison between corrective His bundle pacing and biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization: A secondary analysis of the His-SYNC Pilot Trial. Heart Rhythm. 2019 12; 16(12):1797-1807.
Score: 0.300
-
His Corrective Pacing or Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization in Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 07 09; 74(1):157-159.
Score: 0.300
-
Right Ventricular Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Devices. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2018 03; 10(1):31-42.
Score: 0.271
-
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Heart Failure in the DEFEAT-HF Study: Lost Battle or Lasting Opportunities? JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Feb; 4(2):137-139.
Score: 0.238
-
Managing atrial fibrillation in the CRT patient: controversy or consensus? Heart Rhythm. 2012 Aug; 9(8 Suppl):S51-9.
Score: 0.184
-
Making a splash? -Intrathoracic impedance and the prediction of arrhythmic events.-. Circ J. 2011; 75(11):2539-40.
Score: 0.177
-
Conduction system pacing compared with biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: Results from International Collaborative LBBAP Study (I-CLAS) Group. Heart Rhythm. 2025 Jun; 22(6):1512-1522.
Score: 0.109
-
Left Bundle Branch Block: Characterization, Definitions, and Recent Insights into Conduction System Physiology. Cardiol Clin. 2023 Aug; 41(3):379-391.
Score: 0.100
-
2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure. Heart Rhythm. 2023 09; 20(9):e17-e91.
Score: 0.099
-
Rescue left bundle branch area pacing in coronary venous lead failure or nonresponse to biventricular pacing: Results from International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group. Heart Rhythm. 2022 08; 19(8):1272-1280.
Score: 0.092
-
Left ventricle and mitral valve reverse remodeling in response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Echocardiography. 2020 10; 37(10):1557-1565.
Score: 0.082
-
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Systems. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 04 03; 71(13):1483-1493.
Score: 0.069
-
Pushing and recognizing the limits of nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A valuable "negative" trial. Heart Rhythm. 2018 06; 15(6):877-878.
Score: 0.069
-
Characterization of Ventricular Tachycardia After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation as Destination Therapy: A Single-Center Ablation Experience. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 12 11; 3(12):1412-1424.
Score: 0.066
-
Cause of death and CRT device selection: striving for certitude? Eur Heart J. 2015 Nov 01; 36(41):2777-9.
Score: 0.058
-
Renal Response in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Predicts Outcome Following Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Oct; 38(10):1192-200.
Score: 0.058
-
Pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dilation predict clinical outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Jun; 2(3):230-7.
Score: 0.053
-
Device-measured physical activity versus six-minute walk test as a predictor of reverse remodeling and outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2014 May 01; 113(9):1523-8.
Score: 0.052
-
Impact of myocardial viability and left ventricular lead location on clinical outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 May; 25(5):507-513.
Score: 0.052
-
Usefulness and consequences of cardiac resynchronization therapy in dialysis-dependent patients with heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2013 Nov 15; 112(10):1625-31.
Score: 0.051
-
Right ventricular lead adjustment in cardiac resynchronization therapy and acute hemodynamic response: a pilot study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013 Apr; 36(3):223-31.
Score: 0.048
-
Electrical delay in apically positioned left ventricular leads and clinical outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Feb; 24(2):182-7.
Score: 0.047
-
Multidisciplinary care of patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Eur Heart J. 2012 Sep; 33(17):2181-8.
Score: 0.046
-
Multicenter Hemodynamic Assessment of the LOT-CRT Strategy: When Does Combining Left Bundle Branch Pacing and Coronary Venous Pacing Enhance Resynchronization?: Primary Results of the CSPOT Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024 Nov; 17(11):e013059.
Score: 0.027
-
QRS morphology, left ventricular lead location, and clinical outcome in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2013 Aug; 34(29):2252-62.
Score: 0.012