The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Gaurav A Upadhyay to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Gaurav A Upadhyay has written about Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
Gaurav A Upadhyay
Connection Strength
13.136
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
  1. Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing in patients with mid-range ejection fraction. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan; 68(1):111-116.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.870
  2. Physiologic Pacing Targeting the His Bundle and Left Bundle Branch: a Review of the Literature. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 08; 24(8):959-978.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.748
  3. Population-Level Impact of the Guidelines Update on Patient Selection and Outcomes After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 05; 8(5):651-661.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.738
  4. Left Bundle Branch Block: Characterization, Definitions, and Recent Insights into Conduction System Physiology. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2021 12; 13(4):671-684.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.721
  5. Bradyarrhythmias and Physiologic Pacing in the ICU. J Intensive Care Med. 2022 May; 37(5):595-610.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.689
  6. Keeping pace with the competition: His bundle versus biventricular pacing in heart failure. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2020 05; 35(3):295-307.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.646
  7. On-treatment comparison between corrective His bundle pacing and biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization: A secondary analysis of the His-SYNC Pilot Trial. Heart Rhythm. 2019 12; 16(12):1797-1807.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.604
  8. His Corrective Pacing or Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization in Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 07 09; 74(1):157-159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.604
  9. His Bundle Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2018 09; 10(3):511-517.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.571
  10. Pushing and recognizing the limits of nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A valuable "negative" trial. Heart Rhythm. 2018 06; 15(6):877-878.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.553
  11. Right Ventricular Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Devices. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2018 03; 10(1):31-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.547
  12. Does Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Benefit Patients with Non-Left Bundle Branch Block Prolonged QRS Patterns? Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017 10 24; 19(12):125.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.543
  13. Selective versus non-selective his bundle pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Electrocardiol. 2017 Mar - Apr; 50(2):191-194.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.506
  14. Cause of death and CRT device selection: striving for certitude? Eur Heart J. 2015 Nov 01; 36(41):2777-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.469
  15. Assessing mitral regurgitation in the prediction of clinical outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jun; 12(6):1201-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.451
  16. Managing atrial fibrillation in the CRT patient: controversy or consensus? Heart Rhythm. 2012 Aug; 9(8 Suppl):S51-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.370
  17. Making a splash? -Intrathoracic impedance and the prediction of arrhythmic events.-. Circ J. 2011; 75(11):2539-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.356
  18. Multicenter Hemodynamic Assessment of the LOT-CRT Strategy: When Does Combining Left Bundle Branch Pacing and Coronary Venous Pacing Enhance Resynchronization?: Primary Results of the CSPOT Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024 Nov; 17(11):e013059.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.220
  19. Cardiac Conduction System Pacing: A Comprehensive Update. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 11; 9(11):2358-2387.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  20. Left Bundle Branch Block: Characterization, Definitions, and Recent Insights into Conduction System Physiology. Cardiol Clin. 2023 Aug; 41(3):379-391.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.202
  21. 2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure. Heart Rhythm. 2023 09; 20(9):e17-e91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  22. Rescue left bundle branch area pacing in coronary venous lead failure or nonresponse to biventricular pacing: Results from International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group. Heart Rhythm. 2022 08; 19(8):1272-1280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.186
  23. Left ventricle and mitral valve reverse remodeling in response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Echocardiography. 2020 10; 37(10):1557-1565.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  24. The effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular and mitral valve geometry and secondary mitral regurgitation in patients with left bundle branch block. Echocardiography. 2019 08; 36(8):1450-1458.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  25. Intracardiac Delineation of Septal Conduction in Left Bundle-Branch Block Patterns. Circulation. 2019 04 16; 139(16):1876-1888.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.150
  26. Effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy after inferior myocardial infarction on secondary mitral regurgitation and mitral valve geometry. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 02; 41(2):114-121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  27. Arrhythmia care in a value-based environment: Past, present, and future: Developed and endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS). Heart Rhythm. 2018 02; 15(2):e5-e15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  28. Impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy on mitral valve apparatus geometry and clinical outcomes in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation. Echocardiography. 2017 Nov; 34(11):1561-1567.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  29. Renal Response in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Predicts Outcome Following Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Oct; 38(10):1192-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  30. Progressive ventricular dysfunction among nonresponders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: baseline predictors and associated clinical outcomes. Heart Rhythm. 2014 Nov; 11(11):1991-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  31. Does prior valve surgery change outcome in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Nov; 25(11):1206-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  32. Pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dilation predict clinical outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Jun; 2(3):230-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  33. Device-measured physical activity versus six-minute walk test as a predictor of reverse remodeling and outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2014 May 01; 113(9):1523-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  34. Impact of myocardial viability and left ventricular lead location on clinical outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 May; 25(5):507-513.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  35. Usefulness and consequences of cardiac resynchronization therapy in dialysis-dependent patients with heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2013 Nov 15; 112(10):1625-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  36. The anatomic and electrical location of the left ventricular lead predicts ventricular arrhythmia in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2013 May; 10(5):668-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  37. Electrical delay in apically positioned left ventricular leads and clinical outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Feb; 24(2):182-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  38. Usefulness of hemoglobin A(1c) to predict outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus and heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2012 Sep 01; 110(5):683-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  39. Multidisciplinary care of patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Eur Heart J. 2012 Sep; 33(17):2181-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  40. Atrioventricular nodal ablation in atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of biventricular vs. right ventricular pacing mode. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Jun; 14(6):661-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  41. His Bundle Pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 08 21; 72(8):927-947.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.