Jasmin Tiro to Aged
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jasmin Tiro has written about Aged.
Connection Strength
1.142
-
Stepped Behavioral and Biological Screening for Oral Oncogenic HPV DNA in Middle-aged and Elderly Adults: A Feasibility Study. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2023 03 01; 16(3):127-132.
Score: 0.068
-
Population-based correlates of COVID-19 infection: An analysis from the DFW COVID-19 prevalence study. PLoS One. 2022; 17(12):e0278335.
Score: 0.067
-
Evaluating Screening Participation, Follow-up, and Outcomes for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer in the PROSPR Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 03 01; 112(3):238-246.
Score: 0.055
-
Emergency Department Testing Patterns for Sexually Transmitted Diseases in North Texas. Sex Transm Dis. 2019 07; 46(7):434-439.
Score: 0.053
-
Cervical Cancer Burden and Opportunities for Prevention in a Safety-Net Healthcare System. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 12; 27(12):1398-1406.
Score: 0.050
-
Effects of program scale-up on time to resolution for patients with abnormal screening mammography results. Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Oct; 29(10):995-1005.
Score: 0.050
-
Reducing "I Don't Know" Responses and Missing Survey Data: Implications for Measurement. Med Decis Making. 2018 08; 38(6):673-682.
Score: 0.049
-
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance Among Patients With Cirrhosis in a Population-based Integrated Health Care Delivery System. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug; 51(7):650-655.
Score: 0.046
-
County-level outcomes of a rural breast cancer screening outreach strategy: a decentralized hub-and-spoke model (BSPAN2). Transl Behav Med. 2017 06; 7(2):349-357.
Score: 0.046
-
Modification and validation of the Treatment Self Regulation Questionnaire to assess parental motivation for HPV vaccination of adolescents. Vaccine. 2016 09 22; 34(41):4985-4990.
Score: 0.043
-
Validity of Single-Item Screening for Limited Health Literacy in English and Spanish Speakers. Am J Public Health. 2016 May; 106(5):889-92.
Score: 0.042
-
Assessing race and ethnicity data quality across cancer registries and EMRs in two hospitals. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 05; 23(3):627-34.
Score: 0.041
-
Validation of self-reported post-treatment mammography surveillance among breast cancer survivors by electronic medical record extraction method. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jun; 151(2):427-34.
Score: 0.039
-
Understanding how mothers of adolescent girls obtain information about the human papillomavirus vaccine: associations between mothers' health beliefs, information seeking, and vaccination intentions in an ethnically diverse sample. J Health Psychol. 2013 Jul; 18(7):926-38.
Score: 0.033
-
Failure rates in the hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance process. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2012 Sep; 5(9):1124-30.
Score: 0.033
-
Knowledge and intention to participate in cervical cancer screening after the human papillomavirus vaccine. Vaccine. 2011 Jun 06; 29(25):4238-43.
Score: 0.030
-
What do women in the U.S. know about human papillomavirus and cervical cancer? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Feb; 16(2):288-94.
Score: 0.022
-
Factorial validity and invariance of a survey measuring psychosocial correlates of colorectal cancer screening among African Americans and Caucasians. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Dec; 14(12):2855-61.
Score: 0.021
-
Economic Evaluation of Mailed Home-Based Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling Kits for Cervical Cancer Screening. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 03 01; 6(3):e234052.
Score: 0.017
-
Caregivers of youth in foster care in Texas and their role in contraception decision-making for adolescents in care. Contraception. 2023 06; 122:109993.
Score: 0.017
-
Factors associated with timely colposcopy following an abnormal cervical cancer test result. Prev Med. 2022 11; 164:107307.
Score: 0.017
-
Variation in the receipt of human papilloma virus co-testing for cervical screening: Individual, provider, facility and healthcare system characteristics. Prev Med. 2022 01; 154:106871.
Score: 0.016
-
Out of reach? Correlates of cervical cancer underscreening in women with varying levels of healthcare interactions in a United States integrated delivery system. Prev Med. 2021 04; 145:106410.
Score: 0.015
-
Sex disparities in presentation and prognosis of 1110 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 08; 52(4):701-709.
Score: 0.014
-
Understanding Underuse of Advance Care Planning Among a Cohort of African American Patients With Advanced Cancer: Formative Research That Examines Gaps in Intent to Discuss Options for Care. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Dec; 36(12):1057-1062.
Score: 0.013
-
Cervical cancer screening research in the PROSPR I consortium: Rationale, methods and baseline findings from a US cohort. Int J Cancer. 2019 03 15; 144(6):1460-1473.
Score: 0.013
-
Mailed Outreach Invitations Significantly Improve HCC Surveillance Rates in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Hepatology. 2019 01; 69(1):121-130.
Score: 0.013
-
Patterns and predictors of repeat fecal immunochemical and occult blood test screening in four large health care systems in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 05; 113(5):746-754.
Score: 0.012
-
Primary care visit use after positive fecal immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening. Cancer. 2017 Oct 01; 123(19):3744-3753.
Score: 0.011
-
Deconstructing Decisions to Initiate, Maintain, or Discontinue Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Mixed-Methods Study. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 05 01; 44(3):E101-E110.
Score: 0.011
-
Hispanic and Immigrant Paradoxes in U.S. Breast Cancer Mortality: Impact of Neighborhood Poverty and Hispanic Density. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 12 14; 13(12).
Score: 0.011
-
Mailed Outreach Program Increases Ultrasound Screening of Patients With Cirrhosis for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2017 02; 152(3):608-615.e4.
Score: 0.011
-
Variation in Screening Abnormality Rates and Follow-Up of Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening within the PROSPR Consortium. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Apr; 31(4):372-9.
Score: 0.011
-
The Desires of Their Hearts: The Multidisciplinary Perspectives of African Americans on End-of-Life Care in the African American Community. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jul; 34(6):510-517.
Score: 0.010
-
Outreach invitations for FIT and colonoscopy improve colorectal cancer screening rates: A randomized controlled trial in a safety-net health system. Cancer. 2016 Feb 01; 122(3):456-63.
Score: 0.010
-
Residential racial segregation and mortality among black, white, and Hispanic urban breast cancer patients in Texas, 1995 to 2009. Cancer. 2015 Jun 01; 121(11):1845-55.
Score: 0.010
-
Role functioning is associated with survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Qual Life Res. 2015 Jul; 24(7):1669-75.
Score: 0.010
-
Racial, social, and clinical determinants of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance. Am J Med. 2015 Jan; 128(1):90.e1-7.
Score: 0.009
-
Therapeutic delays lead to worse survival among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013 Sep 01; 11(9):1101-8.
Score: 0.009
-
Validity of self-reported genetic counseling and genetic testing use among breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Dec; 7(4):624-9.
Score: 0.009
-
Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at advanced stages among patients in the HALT-C trial: where did surveillance fail? Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar; 108(3):425-32.
Score: 0.008
-
Are cancer registries a viable tool for cancer survivor outreach? A feasibility study. J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Mar; 7(1):155-63.
Score: 0.008
-
Evaluating associations between sources of information, knowledge of the human papillomavirus, and human papillomavirus vaccine uptake for adult women in California. Vaccine. 2012 Apr 19; 30(19):3003-8.
Score: 0.008
-
Understanding impediments and enablers to physical activity among African American adults: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Health Educ Res. 2011 Dec; 26(6):1010-24.
Score: 0.008
-
Community events as viable sites for recruiting minority volunteers who agree to be contacted for future research. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 May; 32(3):369-71.
Score: 0.007
-
Too much of a good thing? Physician practices and patient willingness for less frequent pap test screening intervals. Med Care. 2010 Mar; 48(3):249-59.
Score: 0.007
-
Mediating factors in the relationship between income and mammography use in low-income insured women. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 Oct; 17(8):1371-8.
Score: 0.006
-
Does patient health and hysterectomy status influence cervical cancer screening in older women? J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Nov; 23(11):1822-8.
Score: 0.006
-
Reliability and validity of a questionnaire to measure colorectal cancer screening behaviors: does mode of survey administration matter? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Apr; 17(4):758-67.
Score: 0.006
-
Promoting regular mammography screening I. A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Mar 05; 100(5):333-46.
Score: 0.006
-
Promoting regular mammography screening II. Results from a randomized controlled trial in US women veterans. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Mar 05; 100(5):347-58.
Score: 0.006
-
Reported drop in mammography : is this cause for concern? Cancer. 2007 Jun 15; 109(12):2405-9.
Score: 0.006
-
Test-retest reliability of self-reported mammography in women veterans. Prev Med. 2006 Apr; 42(4):320-6.
Score: 0.005