The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Jasmin Tiro to Middle Aged

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jasmin Tiro has written about Middle Aged.
Jasmin Tiro
Connection Strength
1.538
Middle Aged
  1. Process Mapping to Compare and Improve Management of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Results in Two US Healthcare Systems within the PROSPR Consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2025 Nov 03; 34(11):1989-1999.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  2. Barriers to the Equitable Implementation of Risk-Based Cervical Cancer Management Guidelines. J Gen Intern Med. 2026 Feb; 41(3):759-766.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  3. Delivering Guideline-Concordant Care for Patients With High-Risk HPV and Normal Cytologic Findings. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 01 02; 8(1):e2454969.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  4. Unmet Needs and Receipt of Supportive Care Services in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Prior to Oncologic Treatment: A Prospective, Cross-Sectional Pilot Study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2023 Nov; 132(11):1361-1372.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  5. Stepped Behavioral and Biological Screening for Oral Oncogenic HPV DNA in Middle-aged and Elderly Adults: A Feasibility Study. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2023 03 01; 16(3):127-132.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  6. Population-based correlates of COVID-19 infection: An analysis from the DFW COVID-19 prevalence study. PLoS One. 2022; 17(12):e0278335.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  7. The impact of intimate partner violence on breast and cervical cancer survivors in an integrated, safety-net setting. J Cancer Surviv. 2020 12; 14(6):906-914.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  8. Evaluating Screening Participation, Follow-up, and Outcomes for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer in the PROSPR Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 03 01; 112(3):238-246.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  9. Emergency Department Testing Patterns for Sexually Transmitted Diseases in North Texas. Sex Transm Dis. 2019 07; 46(7):434-439.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  10. Understanding Patients' Perspectives and Information Needs Following a Positive Home Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling Kit Result. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 03; 28(3):384-392.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  11. Cervical Cancer Burden and Opportunities for Prevention in a Safety-Net Healthcare System. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 12; 27(12):1398-1406.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  12. Cervical cancer screening among HIV-infected women in an urban, United States safety-net healthcare system. AIDS. 2018 08 24; 32(13):1861-1870.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  13. Effects of program scale-up on time to resolution for patients with abnormal screening mammography results. Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Oct; 29(10):995-1005.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  14. Reducing "I Don't Know" Responses and Missing Survey Data: Implications for Measurement. Med Decis Making. 2018 08; 38(6):673-682.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  15. Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance Among Patients With Cirrhosis in a Population-based Integrated Health Care Delivery System. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug; 51(7):650-655.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  16. County-level outcomes of a rural breast cancer screening outreach strategy: a decentralized hub-and-spoke model (BSPAN2). Transl Behav Med. 2017 06; 7(2):349-357.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  17. Translating self-persuasion into an adolescent HPV vaccine promotion intervention for parents attending safety-net clinics. Patient Educ Couns. 2017 04; 100(4):736-741.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  18. Modification and validation of the Treatment Self Regulation Questionnaire to assess parental motivation for HPV vaccination of adolescents. Vaccine. 2016 09 22; 34(41):4985-4990.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  19. Validity of Single-Item Screening for Limited Health Literacy in English and Spanish Speakers. Am J Public Health. 2016 May; 106(5):889-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  20. Assessing race and ethnicity data quality across cancer registries and EMRs in two hospitals. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 05; 23(3):627-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  21. Validation of self-reported post-treatment mammography surveillance among breast cancer survivors by electronic medical record extraction method. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jun; 151(2):427-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  22. Does language moderate the influence of information scanning and seeking on HPV knowledge and vaccine awareness and initiation among Hispanics? Ethn Dis. 2013; 23(1):95-102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  23. Understanding how mothers of adolescent girls obtain information about the human papillomavirus vaccine: associations between mothers' health beliefs, information seeking, and vaccination intentions in an ethnically diverse sample. J Health Psychol. 2013 Jul; 18(7):926-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  24. Failure rates in the hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance process. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2012 Sep; 5(9):1124-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  25. Human papillomavirus vaccine use among adolescent girls and young adult women: an analysis of the 2007 California Health Interview Survey. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Jun; 21(6):656-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  26. Knowledge and intention to participate in cervical cancer screening after the human papillomavirus vaccine. Vaccine. 2011 Jun 06; 29(25):4238-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  27. What do women in the U.S. know about human papillomavirus and cervical cancer? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Feb; 16(2):288-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  28. Factorial validity and invariance of a survey measuring psychosocial correlates of colorectal cancer screening among African Americans and Caucasians. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Dec; 14(12):2855-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  29. Gaps in care across the cancer screening continuum for cervical, colorectal, and lung cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Dec 01; 117(12):2556-2570.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  30. Validation of scales measuring attitudes and norms related to mammography screening in women veterans. Health Psychol. 2005 Nov; 24(6):555-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  31. Guideline-Concordant Surveillance After Treatment for High-Grade Cervical Dysplasia. Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May 01; 145(5):461-468.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  32. Cervical cancer screening rates in females living with HIV at three healthcare settings in the United States, 2010-2019. Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Mar; 36(3):275-284.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  33. Exploring adolescent contraceptive counseling: A hypothetical daughter scenario. Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Jan; 130:108486.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  34. Association Between Clinician Confidence and Making Guideline-Recommended Decisions in the Management of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Results. J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Dec; 39(16):3217-3224.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  35. Assessing Management of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Results and Concordance with Guideline Recommendations in Three US Healthcare Settings. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Jul 01; 33(7):912-922.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  36. Characteristics of Clinicians Caring for Transgender Men and Nonbinary Individuals and Guideline Concordance of Clinicians' Cervical Cancer Screening Counseling for Cisgender Individuals Versus Transgender Men and Nonbinary Individuals with a Cervix. LGBT Health. 2024 Oct; 11(7):563-569.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  37. Strategies to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening With Mailed Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling Kits: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023 11 28; 330(20):1971-1981.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  38. Economic Evaluation of Mailed Home-Based Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling Kits for Cervical Cancer Screening. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 03 01; 6(3):e234052.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  39. Caregivers of youth in foster care in Texas and their role in contraception decision-making for adolescents in care. Contraception. 2023 06; 122:109993.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  40. Effect of Patient Characteristics on Uptake of Screening Using a Mailed Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling Kit: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 11 01; 5(11):e2244343.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  41. Factors associated with timely colposcopy following an abnormal cervical cancer test result. Prev Med. 2022 11; 164:107307.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  42. Long-term Mammography Adherence among Uninsured Women Enrolled in the Breast Screening and Patient Navigation (BSPAN) Program. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 01; 31(1):77-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  43. Variation in the receipt of human papilloma virus co-testing for cervical screening: Individual, provider, facility and healthcare system characteristics. Prev Med. 2022 01; 154:106871.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  44. Reimbursement Matters: Overcoming Barriers to Clinical Trial Accrual. Med Care. 2021 05 01; 59(5):461-466.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  45. T Cell Receptor Repertoires Acquired via Routine Pap Testing May Help Refine Cervical Cancer and Precancer Risk Estimates. Front Immunol. 2021; 12:624230.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  46. Anal Cancer and Anal Cancer Screening Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceived Risk Among Women Living With HIV. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2021 Jan 01; 25(1):43-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  47. Out of reach? Correlates of cervical cancer underscreening in women with varying levels of healthcare interactions in a United States integrated delivery system. Prev Med. 2021 04; 145:106410.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  48. Sex disparities in presentation and prognosis of 1110 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 08; 52(4):701-709.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  49. Biophysicochemical motifs in T cell receptor sequences as a potential biomarker for high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. PLoS One. 2020; 15(3):e0229569.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  50. Reactions of women underscreened for cervical cancer who received unsolicited human papillomavirus self-sampling kits. J Med Screen. 2020 09; 27(3):146-156.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  51. Evaluating the Validity of the Risk Perception Survey for Developing Diabetes Scale in a Safety-Net Clinic Population of English and Spanish Speakers. Diabetes Educ. 2020 02; 46(1):73-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  52. Effect of Mailed Human Papillomavirus Test Kits vs Usual Care Reminders on Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake, Precancer Detection, and Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 11 01; 2(11):e1914729.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  53. Understanding Underuse of Advance Care Planning Among a Cohort of African American Patients With Advanced Cancer: Formative Research That Examines Gaps in Intent to Discuss Options for Care. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Dec; 36(12):1057-1062.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  54. Cervical cancer screening research in the PROSPR I consortium: Rationale, methods and baseline findings from a US cohort. Int J Cancer. 2019 03 15; 144(6):1460-1473.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  55. Mailed Outreach Invitations Significantly Improve HCC Surveillance Rates in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Hepatology. 2019 01; 69(1):121-130.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  56. Social Disadvantage, Healthcare Utilization, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: Leveraging Longitudinal Patient Address and Health Records Data. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 12; 27(12):1424-1432.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  57. Patterns and predictors of repeat fecal immunochemical and occult blood test screening in four large health care systems in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 05; 113(5):746-754.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  58. Rationale and design of the HOME trial: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of home-based human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling for increasing cervical cancer screening uptake and effectiveness in a U.S. healthcare system. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 01; 64:77-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  59. Effect of Colonoscopy Outreach vs Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 09 05; 318(9):806-815.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  60. Primary care visit use after positive fecal immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening. Cancer. 2017 Oct 01; 123(19):3744-3753.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  61. Deconstructing Decisions to Initiate, Maintain, or Discontinue Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Mixed-Methods Study. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 05 01; 44(3):E101-E110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  62. An assessment of benefits and harms of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2017 04; 65(4):1196-1205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  63. Hispanic and Immigrant Paradoxes in U.S. Breast Cancer Mortality: Impact of Neighborhood Poverty and Hispanic Density. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 12 14; 13(12).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  64. Mailed Outreach Program Increases Ultrasound Screening of Patients With Cirrhosis for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2017 02; 152(3):608-615.e4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  65. Patient-reported barriers are associated with lower hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance rates in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2017 03; 65(3):875-884.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  66. Reasons for Lack of Diagnostic Colonoscopy After Positive Result on Fecal Immunochemical Test in a Safety-Net Health System. Am J Med. 2017 Jan; 130(1):93.e1-93.e7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  67. Variation in Screening Abnormality Rates and Follow-Up of Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening within the PROSPR Consortium. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Apr; 31(4):372-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  68. The Desires of Their Hearts: The Multidisciplinary Perspectives of African Americans on End-of-Life Care in the African American Community. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jul; 34(6):510-517.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  69. Outreach invitations for FIT and colonoscopy improve colorectal cancer screening rates: A randomized controlled trial in a safety-net health system. Cancer. 2016 Feb 01; 122(3):456-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  70. Role functioning is associated with survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Qual Life Res. 2015 Jul; 24(7):1669-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  71. Racial, social, and clinical determinants of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance. Am J Med. 2015 Jan; 128(1):90.e1-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  72. Practice patterns and attitudes of primary care providers and barriers to surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Apr; 13(4):791-8.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  73. Impediments and facilitators to physical activity and perceptions of sedentary behavior among urban community residents: the Fair Park Study. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Oct 31; 10:E177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  74. Therapeutic delays lead to worse survival among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013 Sep 01; 11(9):1101-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  75. Validity of self-reported genetic counseling and genetic testing use among breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Dec; 7(4):624-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  76. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at advanced stages among patients in the HALT-C trial: where did surveillance fail? Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar; 108(3):425-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  77. Are cancer registries a viable tool for cancer survivor outreach? A feasibility study. J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Mar; 7(1):155-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  78. Effects of socioeconomic status and health care access on low levels of human papillomavirus vaccination among Spanish-speaking Hispanics in California. Am J Public Health. 2013 Feb; 103(2):270-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  79. Evaluating associations between sources of information, knowledge of the human papillomavirus, and human papillomavirus vaccine uptake for adult women in California. Vaccine. 2012 Apr 19; 30(19):3003-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  80. Understanding impediments and enablers to physical activity among African American adults: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Health Educ Res. 2011 Dec; 26(6):1010-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  81. Was the drop in mammography rates in 2005 associated with the drop in hormone therapy use? Cancer. 2011 Dec 15; 117(24):5450-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  82. Community events as viable sites for recruiting minority volunteers who agree to be contacted for future research. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 May; 32(3):369-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  83. Too much of a good thing? Physician practices and patient willingness for less frequent pap test screening intervals. Med Care. 2010 Mar; 48(3):249-59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  84. Construct validity of a mammography processes of change scale and invariance by stage of change. J Health Psychol. 2010 Jan; 15(1):64-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  85. Mediating factors in the relationship between income and mammography use in low-income insured women. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 Oct; 17(8):1371-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  86. Does patient health and hysterectomy status influence cervical cancer screening in older women? J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Nov; 23(11):1822-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  87. Construct validity and invariance of four factors associated with colorectal cancer screening across gender, race, and prior screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Sep; 17(9):2231-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  88. Reliability and validity of a questionnaire to measure colorectal cancer screening behaviors: does mode of survey administration matter? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Apr; 17(4):758-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  89. Promoting regular mammography screening I. A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Mar 05; 100(5):333-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  90. Promoting regular mammography screening II. Results from a randomized controlled trial in US women veterans. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Mar 05; 100(5):347-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  91. Reported drop in mammography : is this cause for concern? Cancer. 2007 Jun 15; 109(12):2405-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  92. Test-retest reliability of self-reported mammography in women veterans. Prev Med. 2006 Apr; 42(4):320-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  93. Additive impact of childhood emotional, physical, and sexual abuse on suicide attempts among low-income African American women. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2002; 32(2):131-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.