The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Jasmin Tiro to Papillomavirus Infections

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jasmin Tiro has written about Papillomavirus Infections.
Connection Strength

7.725
  1. Delivering Guideline-Concordant Care for Patients With High-Risk HPV and Normal Cytologic Findings. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 01 02; 8(1):e2454969.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.686
  2. Stepped Behavioral and Biological Screening for Oral Oncogenic HPV DNA in Middle-aged and Elderly Adults: A Feasibility Study. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2023 03 01; 16(3):127-132.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.604
  3. Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 09 01; 5(9):e2234000.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.584
  4. Mechanisms of self-persuasion intervention for HPV vaccination: Testing memory and autonomous motivation. Health Psychol. 2021 Dec; 40(12):887-896.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.537
  5. Understanding Patients' Perspectives and Information Needs Following a Positive Home Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling Kit Result. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 03; 28(3):384-392.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.450
  6. Translating self-persuasion into an adolescent HPV vaccine promotion intervention for parents attending safety-net clinics. Patient Educ Couns. 2017 04; 100(4):736-741.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.391
  7. Characterizing safety-net providers' HPV vaccine recommendations to undecided parents: A pilot study. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 09; 99(9):1452-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.380
  8. Does language moderate the influence of information scanning and seeking on HPV knowledge and vaccine awareness and initiation among Hispanics? Ethn Dis. 2013; 23(1):95-102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.299
  9. Human papillomavirus vaccine use among adolescent girls and young adult women: an analysis of the 2007 California Health Interview Survey. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Jun; 21(6):656-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.283
  10. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer behavioral surveillance in the US. Cancer. 2008 Nov 15; 113(10 Suppl):3013-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  11. What do women in the U.S. know about human papillomavirus and cervical cancer? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Feb; 16(2):288-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.198
  12. Strategies to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening With Mailed Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling Kits: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023 11 28; 330(20):1971-1981.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  13. Timing of Colposcopy and Risk of Cervical Cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2023 11 01; 142(5):1125-1134.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  14. Economic Evaluation of Mailed Home-Based Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling Kits for Cervical Cancer Screening. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 03 01; 6(3):e234052.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  15. Provider beliefs in effectiveness and recommendations for primary HPV testing inĀ 3 health-care systems. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023 01 03; 7(1).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  16. Effect of Patient Characteristics on Uptake of Screening Using a Mailed Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling Kit: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 11 01; 5(11):e2244343.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  17. Design of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of home-based human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling for increasing cervical cancer screening uptake in a U.S. healthcare system: The STEP trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 11; 122:106960.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  18. Gaps in the screening process for women diagnosed with cervical cancer in four diverse US health care settings. Cancer Med. 2023 02; 12(3):3705-3717.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  19. Missed Vaccination Opportunities Among U.S. Adolescents by Area Characteristics. Am J Prev Med. 2022 04; 62(4):538-547.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  20. Variation in the receipt of human papilloma virus co-testing for cervical screening: Individual, provider, facility and healthcare system characteristics. Prev Med. 2022 01; 154:106871.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  21. T Cell Receptor Repertoires Acquired via Routine Pap Testing May Help Refine Cervical Cancer and Precancer Risk Estimates. Front Immunol. 2021; 12:624230.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  22. Blood-based biomarkers of human papillomavirus-associated cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer. 2021 03 15; 127(6):850-864.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  23. Considerations in Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer Screening: A Review. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 07 01; 146(7):656-664.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  24. Authors' response: Cost-effectiveness evidence for HPV self-sampling could be improved by giving greater attention to vulnerable populations. Prev Med. 2020 10; 139:106081.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  25. Cost-effectiveness studies of HPV self-sampling: A systematic review. Prev Med. 2020 03; 132:105953.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  26. Reactions of women underscreened for cervical cancer who received unsolicited human papillomavirus self-sampling kits. J Med Screen. 2020 09; 27(3):146-156.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  27. Effect of Mailed Human Papillomavirus Test Kits vs Usual Care Reminders on Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake, Precancer Detection, and Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 11 01; 2(11):e1914729.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  28. Cervical cancer screening research in the PROSPR I consortium: Rationale, methods and baseline findings from a US cohort. Int J Cancer. 2019 03 15; 144(6):1460-1473.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  29. Advancing Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Delivery: 12 Priority Research Gaps. Acad Pediatr. 2018 03; 18(2S):S14-S16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  30. Rationale and design of the HOME trial: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of home-based human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling for increasing cervical cancer screening uptake and effectiveness in a U.S. healthcare system. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 01; 64:77-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  31. Modification and validation of the Treatment Self Regulation Questionnaire to assess parental motivation for HPV vaccination of adolescents. Vaccine. 2016 09 22; 34(41):4985-4990.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  32. Human papillomavirus vaccine coverage among females aged 11 to 17 in Texas counties: an application of multilevel, small area estimation. Womens Health Issues. 2013 Mar-Apr; 23(2):e131-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  33. Effects of socioeconomic status and health care access on low levels of human papillomavirus vaccination among Spanish-speaking Hispanics in California. Am J Public Health. 2013 Feb; 103(2):270-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  34. Understanding how mothers of adolescent girls obtain information about the human papillomavirus vaccine: associations between mothers' health beliefs, information seeking, and vaccination intentions in an ethnically diverse sample. J Health Psychol. 2013 Jul; 18(7):926-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  35. Evaluating associations between sources of information, knowledge of the human papillomavirus, and human papillomavirus vaccine uptake for adult women in California. Vaccine. 2012 Apr 19; 30(19):3003-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  36. Multilevel correlates for human papillomavirus vaccination of adolescent girls attending safety net clinics. Vaccine. 2012 Mar 16; 30(13):2368-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  37. One in four California adolescent girls have had human papillomavirus vaccination. Policy Brief UCLA Cent Health Policy Res. 2009 Feb; (PB2009-3):1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  38. Assessing Management of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Results and Concordance with Guideline Recommendations in Three US Healthcare Settings. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Jul 01; 33(7):912-922.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.