The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Ted Skolarus to Aged, 80 and over

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Ted Skolarus has written about Aged, 80 and over.
Ted Skolarus
Connection Strength
1.066
Aged, 80 and over
  1. Reframing Financial Incentives Around Reducing Readmission After Radical Cystectomy. Urology. 2020 08; 142:99-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  2. Optimizing veteran-centered prostate cancer survivorship care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 04 18; 18(1):181.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  3. Variation in readmission expenditures after high-risk surgery. J Surg Res. 2017 06 01; 213:60-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  4. Understanding hospital readmission intensity after radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2015 May; 193(5):1500-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  5. Sharpening the focus on causes and timing of readmission after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Cancer. 2014 May 01; 120(9):1409-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  6. Use of restaging bladder tumor resection for bladder cancer among Medicare beneficiaries. Urology. 2011 Dec; 78(6):1345-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  7. Understanding fragmentation of prostate cancer survivorship care: implications for cost and quality. Cancer. 2012 Jun 01; 118(11):2837-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  8. Primary care perspectives on prostate cancer survivorship: implications for improving quality of care. Urol Oncol. 2013 Aug; 31(6):727-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  9. The delivery of prostate cancer care in the United States: implications for delivery system reform. J Urol. 2010 Dec; 184(6):2279-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  10. The economic burden of prostate cancer survivorship care. J Urol. 2010 Aug; 184(2):532-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  11. Regional differences in early stage bladder cancer care and outcomes. Urology. 2010 Aug; 76(2):391-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  12. Effect of reclassification on the incidence of benign and malignant renal tumors. J Urol. 2010 Feb; 183(2):455-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  13. The distribution of histological subtypes of renal tumors by decade of life using the 2004 WHO classification. J Urol. 2008 Feb; 179(2):439-43; discussion 443-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  14. Adherence and out-of-pocket costs among Medicare beneficiaries who are prescribed oral targeted therapies for advanced prostate cancer. Cancer. 2020 12 01; 126(23):5050-5059.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  15. Resurrecting immortal-time bias in the study of readmissions. Health Serv Res. 2020 04; 55(2):273-276.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  16. Implications of Cystectomy Travel Distance for Hospital Readmission and Survival. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 12; 17(6):e1171-e1180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  17. Trends and appropriateness of perioperative chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. 2019 07; 37(7):462-469.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  18. Urologist Practice Structure and Spending for Prostate Cancer Care. Urology. 2019 Aug; 130:65-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  19. Variation in prostate cancer treatment and spending among Medicare shared savings program accountable care organizations. Cancer. 2018 08; 124(16):3364-3371.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  20. Predictors and Cost of Readmission in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 09; 33(9):2759-2763.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  21. Impact of Accountable Care Organizations on Diagnostic Testing for Prostate Cancer. Urology. 2018 06; 116:68-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  22. Association of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program With Surgical Readmissions. JAMA Surg. 2018 03 01; 153(3):243-250.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  23. Early effect of Medicare Shared Savings Program accountable care organization participation on prostate cancer care. Cancer. 2018 02 01; 124(3):563-570.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  24. Potential Implications of Shortening Length of Stay Following Radical Cystectomy in a Pre-ERAS Population. Urology. 2017 04; 102:92-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  25. Health Care Integration and Quality among Men with Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2017 01; 197(1):55-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  26. Veterans Affairs Telemedicine: Bringing Urologic Care to Remote Clinics. Urology. 2015 Aug; 86(2):255-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  27. Reducing PSA-Based Prostate Cancer Screening in Men Aged?75 Years and Older with the Use of Highly Specific Computerized Clinical Decision Support. J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug; 30(8):1133-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  28. Validating electronic cancer quality measures at Veterans Health Administration. Am J Manag Care. 2014; 20(12):1041-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  29. Use of advanced treatment technologies among men at low risk of dying from prostate cancer. JAMA. 2013 Jun 26; 309(24):2587-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  30. Comparative effectiveness of external-beam radiation approaches for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014 Jan; 65(1):162-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  31. Growth of high-cost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer raises concerns about overuse. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Apr; 31(4):750-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  32. Identifying better practices for early-stage bladder cancer. Med Care. 2011 Dec; 49(12):1112-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  33. Understanding prostate cancer spending growth among Medicare beneficiaries. Urology. 2011 Feb; 77(2):326-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  34. Variation in use of lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Urology. 2011 Feb; 77(2):385-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  35. Delays in diagnosis and bladder cancer mortality. Cancer. 2010 Nov 15; 116(22):5235-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.