The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Ted Skolarus to Humans

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Ted Skolarus has written about Humans.
Ted Skolarus
Connection Strength
1.974
Humans
  1. Survival by first-line therapy and prognostic group among men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Med. 2024 Jun; 13(12):e7334.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  2. Estimating the Size and Scope of the Urologic Oncology Clinical Trials Enterprise. Urol Pract. 2024 Jul; 11(4):627-629.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  3. Primary Care Physician and Urologist Perspectives on Optimizing Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer. Ann Fam Med. 2024 Jan-Feb; 22(1):5-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  4. National Long-term Survival Estimates After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer. Urology. 2024 02; 184:135-141.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  5. Using Implementation Science to Improve Patient Care. J Urol. 2023 10; 210(4):577-579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  6. Outcomes after definitive radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer in a national health care delivery system. Cancer. 2023 10 15; 129(20):3326-3333.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  7. Exploring implementation outcomes in the clinical trial context: a qualitative study of physician trial stakeholders. Trials. 2023 Apr 27; 24(1):297.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  8. Differential adoption of castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment across facilities in a national healthcare system. Cancer Med. 2023 03; 12(6):6945-6955.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  9. Understanding the Role of Urology Practice Organization and Racial Composition in Prostate Cancer Treatment Disparities. JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 05; 19(5):e763-e772.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  10. Envisioning clinical trials as complex interventions. Cancer. 2022 09 01; 128(17):3145-3151.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  11. Better Understanding the Timing Of Androgen Deprivation Trial Outcomes: Impacts of Prior Androgen Deprivation Therapy. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2022 05 02; 6(3).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  12. Prostate cancer clinical trial completion: The role of geography. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 12; 111:106600.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  13. Considerations in the Analysis of Clinical Trial Failure. J Urol. 2022 01; 207(1):9-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  14. Designing lean, efficient clinical trials is an ethical imperative: the fragility index should not be used in the design of randomized clinical trials. Urol Oncol. 2021 10; 39(10):738-739.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  15. Factors influencing treatment of veterans with advanced prostate cancer. Cancer. 2021 07 01; 127(13):2311-2318.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  16. Making Tumor Boards More Patient-Centered: Let's Start With the Name. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 10; 17(10):591-593.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  17. Reframing Financial Incentives Around Reducing Readmission After Radical Cystectomy. Urology. 2020 08; 142:99-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  18. Dynamic readmission prediction using routine postoperative laboratory results after radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol. 2020 04; 38(4):255-261.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  19. Characterizing the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Literature: A Bibliometric Analysis. Urology. 2020 Feb; 136:202-211.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  20. Catheter management after benign transurethral prostate surgery: RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Criteria. Am J Manag Care. 2019 12 01; 25(12):e366-e372.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  21. Association between PSA values and surveillance quality after prostate cancer surgery. Cancer Med. 2019 12; 8(18):7903-7912.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  22. Inaugural Readmission Penalties for Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty Procedures Under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 11 01; 2(11):e1916008.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  23. Determinants of quality prostate cancer survivorship care across the primary and specialty care interface: Lessons from the Veterans Health Administration. Cancer Med. 2019 05; 8(5):2686-2702.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  24. Self-Management in Long-Term Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019 05 20; 37(15):1326-1335.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  25. De-implementation of low value castration for men with prostate cancer: protocol for a theory-based, mixed methods approach to minimizing low value androgen deprivation therapy (DeADT). Implement Sci. 2018 11 29; 13(1):144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  26. Characterising potential bone scan overuse amongst men treated with radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2019 07; 124(1):55-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  27. Castration remains despite decreasing definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer in the elderly: A case for de-implementation. Cancer. 2018 10 15; 124(20):3971-3974.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  28. Dissecting Surgeon Behavior: Leveraging the Theoretical Domains Framework to Facilitate Evidence-based Surgical Practice. Ann Surg. 2018 03; 267(3):432-434.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  29. Introduction to a Seminar on implementation and de-implementation to improve urologic cancer care. Urol Oncol. 2018 05; 36(5):244-245.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  30. Editorial Comment. J Urol. 2018 05; 199(5):1172-1173.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  31. The implications of baseline bone-health assessment at initiation of androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2018 04; 121(4):558-564.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  32. Assessing citation networks for dissemination and implementation research frameworks. Implement Sci. 2017 07 28; 12(1):97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  33. Multilingual Self-Management Resources for Prostate Cancer Survivors and Their Partners: Results of a Long-Term Academic-State Health Department Partnership to Promote Survivorship Care. Urology. 2017 Dec; 110:92-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  34. Early National Dissemination of Abiraterone and Enzalutamide for Advanced Prostate Cancer in Medicare Part D. J Oncol Pract. 2017 08; 13(8):e694-e702.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  35. Enhancing prostate cancer survivorship care through self-management. Urol Oncol. 2017 09; 35(9):564-568.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  36. Optimizing veteran-centered prostate cancer survivorship care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 04 18; 18(1):181.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  37. No Differences in Population-based Readmissions After Open and Robotic-assisted Radical Cystectomy: Implications for Post-discharge Care. Urology. 2017 06; 104:77-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  38. Variation in readmission expenditures after high-risk surgery. J Surg Res. 2017 06 01; 213:60-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  39. Implications of Prostate Cancer Treatment in Men With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Urology. 2017 06; 104:131-136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  40. Providing prostate cancer survivorship care in Japan: Implications from the USA care model. Int J Urol. 2016 11; 23(11):906-915.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  41. Treatment of ureteral anastomotic strictures with reimplantation and survival after cystectomy and urinary diversion. Urol Oncol. 2017 01; 35(1):33.e1-33.e9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  42. The Fate of Radical Cystectomy Patients after Hospital Discharge: Understanding the Black Box of the Pre-readmission Interval. Eur Urol Focus. 2018 09; 4(5):711-717.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  43. Using implementation science to improve urologic oncology care. Urol Oncol. 2016 09; 34(9):384-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  44. Re: Neil E. Martin, Laura Massey, Caleb Stowell, et al. Defining a Standard Set of Patient-centered Outcomes for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2015;67:460-7. Eur Urol. 2016 06; 69(6):e125-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  45. Rethinking Patient-Physician Communication of Biopsy Results--The Waiting Game. JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov; 1(8):1025-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  46. Symptom burden and information needs in prostate cancer survivors: a case for tailored long-term survivorship care. BJU Int. 2016 09; 118(3):372-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  47. Editorial comment. Urology. 2015 Mar; 85(3):627-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  48. Minimally important difference for the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form. Urology. 2015 Jan; 85(1):101-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  49. Understanding hospital readmission intensity after radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2015 May; 193(5):1500-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  50. Androgen-deprivation-associated bone disease. Curr Opin Urol. 2014 Nov; 24(6):601-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  51. American Cancer Society prostate cancer survivorship care guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Jul-Aug; 64(4):225-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  52. Sharpening the focus on causes and timing of readmission after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Cancer. 2014 May 01; 120(9):1409-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  53. Quality of prostate cancer care among rural men in the Veterans Health Administration. Cancer. 2013 Oct 15; 119(20):3629-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  54. Editorial comment. Urology. 2013 Apr; 81(4):751.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  55. Evidence of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy specimen and survival after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2013 Feb; 81(2):354-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  56. Monitoring quality of life among prostate cancer survivors: the feasibility of automated telephone assessment. Urology. 2012 Nov; 80(5):1021-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  57. Use of restaging bladder tumor resection for bladder cancer among Medicare beneficiaries. Urology. 2011 Dec; 78(6):1345-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  58. Understanding fragmentation of prostate cancer survivorship care: implications for cost and quality. Cancer. 2012 Jun 01; 118(11):2837-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  59. Primary care perspectives on prostate cancer survivorship: implications for improving quality of care. Urol Oncol. 2013 Aug; 31(6):727-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  60. Primary care perspectives on prostate cancer screening. Nurse Pract. 2011 Jun; 36(6):39-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  61. Understanding early functional recovery after robotic prostatectomy. Surg Innov. 2012 Mar; 19(1):5-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  62. The delivery of prostate cancer care in the United States: implications for delivery system reform. J Urol. 2010 Dec; 184(6):2279-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  63. Does robotic technology mitigate the challenges of large prostate size? Urology. 2010 Nov; 76(5):1117-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  64. Robotic surgery in urologic oncology: gathering the evidence. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010 Aug; 10(4):421-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  65. The economic burden of prostate cancer survivorship care. J Urol. 2010 Aug; 184(2):532-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  66. Improving urologic cancer care. Urol Oncol. 2010 Jul-Aug; 28(4):347-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  67. Regional differences in early stage bladder cancer care and outcomes. Urology. 2010 Aug; 76(2):391-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  68. Effect of reclassification on the incidence of benign and malignant renal tumors. J Urol. 2010 Feb; 183(2):455-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  69. Intravesical bacille Calmette-Guérin therapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: effects of concurrent statin therapy. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Aug; 209(2):248-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  70. Measurement of benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment effects on male sexual function. Int J Impot Res. 2009 Sep-Oct; 21(5):267-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  71. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for low-stage testicular cancer. J Endourol. 2008 Jul; 22(7):1485-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  72. The distribution of histological subtypes of renal tumors by decade of life using the 2004 WHO classification. J Urol. 2008 Feb; 179(2):439-43; discussion 443-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  73. The effect of body mass index on PSA levels and the development, screening and treatment of prostate cancer. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007 Nov; 4(11):605-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  74. Urinary Retention Evaluation and Catheterization Algorithm for Adult Inpatients. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 01; 7(7):e2422281.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  75. Attitudes and barriers toward video visits in surgical care: Insights from a nationwide survey among surgeons. Surgery. 2024 Jul; 176(1):115-123.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  76. Hormonal Therapy and Radiation Therapy in Prostate Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes From a Trial Evaluating Combined Androgen Blockade With 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors as an Alternative to Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonists. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024 Aug; 22(4):102103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  77. Utilization and Timing of Cystoscopy for Hematuria Evaluation by Advanced Practice Providers and Urologists. Urology. 2024 Jun; 188:80-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  78. Patient perspectives on factors influencing active surveillance adherence for low-risk prostate cancer: A qualitative study. Cancer Med. 2024 Jan; 13(1):e6847.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  79. Determinants of Bone-Modifying Agent Prescribing for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in a National Health Care Delivery System. JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 01; 20(1):59-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  80. Comparing Patient-reported Functional Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy in Historical and Contemporary Practice. J Urol. 2023 Nov; 210(5):771-777.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  81. Industry Payments to Urologists and Urologic Advanced Practice Providers in 2021. Urology. 2023 10; 180:121-129.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  82. Mental health care utilization among men with castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving abiraterone or enzalutamide. Cancer Med. 2023 08; 12(15):16490-16501.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  83. Outcomes of Hematuria Evaluation by Advanced Practice Providers and Urologists. Urology. 2023 08; 178:67-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  84. Evaluation of emergency department treat-and-release encounters after major gastrointestinal surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug; 128(2):402-408.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  85. Use of a physical activity monitor to track perioperative activity of radical cystectomy patients. Our first glimpse at what our patients are doing before and after surgery. Urol Oncol. 2023 04; 41(4):206.e11-206.e19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  86. Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID-19 pandemic: A national mixed-method survey study. Cancer Med. 2023 04; 12(7):8729-8741.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  87. Mapping European Association of Urology Guideline Practice Across Europe: An Audit of Androgen Deprivation Therapy Use Before Prostate Cancer Surgery in 6598 Cases in 187 Hospitals Across 31 European Countries. Eur Urol. 2023 05; 83(5):393-401.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  88. Guidelines for Sexual Health Care for Prostate Cancer Patients: Recommendations of an International Panel. J Sex Med. 2022 11; 19(11):1655-1669.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  89. Exploring Variation in the Receipt of Recommended Active Surveillance for Men with Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2022 09; 208(3):600-608.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  90. Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures into health care for men with localized prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2022 05; 19(5):263-279.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  91. Comparison of the treatment of men with prostate cancer between the US and England: an international population-based study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 06; 26(2):287-292.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  92. Urinary incontinence and use of incontinence surgery after radical prostatectomy: a national study using patient-reported outcomes. BJU Int. 2022 07; 130(1):84-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  93. TrueNTH Sexual Recovery Intervention for couples coping with prostate cancer: Randomized controlled trial results. Cancer. 2022 Apr 01; 128(7):1513-1522.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  94. Developing a Patient-Centered Model of Prostate Cancer Care: Patient Satisfaction With a Survivorship Program Embedded in Urologic-Oncologic Care. Urology. 2022 02; 160:161-167.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  95. Promotional Payments to Medical Oncologists and Urologists and Prescriptions for Abiraterone and Enzalutamide. Urology. 2022 03; 161:50-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  96. Improving Guideline Adherence in Urology. Eur Urol Focus. 2022 09; 8(5):1545-1552.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  97. Using an Automated Electronic Health Record Score To Estimate Life Expectancy In Men Diagnosed With Prostate Cancer In The Veterans Health Administration. Urology. 2021 09; 155:70-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  98. Development and Validation of a Short Version of the Metric for the Observation of Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: MODe-Lite. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov; 28(12):7577-7588.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  99. Understanding Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 11; 17(11):e1678-e1687.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  100. Variations in Persistent Use of Low-Value Breast Cancer Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2021 04 01; 156(4):353-362.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  101. Urology Workforce Changes and Implications for Prostate Cancer Care Among Medicare Enrollees. Urology. 2021 09; 155:77-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  102. Estimating the rate and reasons of clinical trial failure in urologic oncology. Urol Oncol. 2021 03; 39(3):154-160.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  103. Primary Care Providers' Perceptions About Participating in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Treatment Decisions. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 02; 36(2):447-454.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  104. Aligning Urology Residency Training With Real-World Workforce Needs. J Surg Educ. 2021 May-Jun; 78(3):820-827.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  105. Demand for Surgical Procedures Following COVID-19: The Need for Operational Strategies That Optimize Resource Utilization and Value. Ann Surg. 2020 10; 272(4):e272-e274.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  106. Reconsidering the Trade-offs of Prostate Cancer Screening. N Engl J Med. 2020 09 24; 383(13):1289-1290.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  107. Adherence and out-of-pocket costs among Medicare beneficiaries who are prescribed oral targeted therapies for advanced prostate cancer. Cancer. 2020 12 01; 126(23):5050-5059.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  108. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Genitourinary Cancer Care: Re-envisioning the Future. Eur Urol. 2020 11; 78(5):731-742.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  109. Scope and Characteristics of Choosing Wisely in Cancer Care Recommendations by Professional Societies. JAMA Oncol. 2020 09 01; 6(9):1463-1465.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  110. The Feasibility and Impact of a Presurgical Exercise Intervention Program (Prehabilitation) for Patients Undergoing Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer. Urology. 2020 11; 145:106-112.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  111. Life expectancy estimates for patients diagnosed with prostate cancer in the Veterans Health Administration. Urol Oncol. 2020 09; 38(9):734.e1-734.e10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  112. Assessing Genitourinary Cancer Clinical Trial Accrual Sufficiency Using Archived Trial Data. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020 07; 4:614-622.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  113. Too Much Surgery: Overcoming Barriers to Deimplementation of Low-value Surgery. Ann Surg. 2020 06; 271(6):1020-1022.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  114. A measure of case complexity for streamlining workflow in multidisciplinary tumor boards: Mixed methods development and early validation of the MeDiC tool. Cancer Med. 2020 07; 9(14):5143-5154.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  115. Resurrecting immortal-time bias in the study of readmissions. Health Serv Res. 2020 04; 55(2):273-276.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  116. Comparison of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 06; 18(3):201-209.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  117. Reply by Authors. J Urol. 2020 02; 203(2):421.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  118. Practice-Level Adoption of Conservative Management for Prostate Cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2019 10; 15(10):e863-e869.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  119. Implications of Cystectomy Travel Distance for Hospital Readmission and Survival. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 12; 17(6):e1171-e1180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  120. Characterising 'bounce-back' readmissions after radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2019 12; 124(6):955-961.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  121. External Validation of the Prostate Cancer Specific Comorbidity Index: A Claims Based Tool for the Prediction of Life Expectancy in Men with Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2019 09; 202(3):518-524.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  122. Adoption of Abiraterone and Enzalutamide by Urologists. Urology. 2019 09; 131:176-183.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  123. Association Between Hospital Participation in Medicare Shared Savings Program Accountable Care Organizations and Readmission Following Major Surgery. Ann Surg. 2019 05; 269(5):873-878.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  124. Trends and appropriateness of perioperative chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. 2019 07; 37(7):462-469.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  125. Urologist Practice Structure and Spending for Prostate Cancer Care. Urology. 2019 Aug; 130:65-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  126. Role of Post-Acute Care on Hospital Readmission After High-Risk Surgery. J Surg Res. 2019 02; 234:116-122.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  127. Population Analysis of Male Urethral Stricture Management and Urethroplasty Success in the United States. Urology. 2019 01; 123:258-264.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  128. Michigan Appropriate Perioperative (MAP) criteria for urinary catheter use in common general and orthopaedic surgeries: results obtained using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 01; 28(1):56-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  129. Variation in prostate cancer treatment and spending among Medicare shared savings program accountable care organizations. Cancer. 2018 08; 124(16):3364-3371.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  130. Predictors and Cost of Readmission in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 09; 33(9):2759-2763.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  131. Impact of Accountable Care Organizations on Diagnostic Testing for Prostate Cancer. Urology. 2018 06; 116:68-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  132. The Research Implications of Prostate Specific Antigen Registry Errors: Data from the Veterans Health Administration. J Urol. 2018 09; 200(3):541-548.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  133. Association of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program With Surgical Readmissions. JAMA Surg. 2018 03 01; 153(3):243-250.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  134. Patient-Reported Sexual Aid Utilization and Efficacy After Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 06 01; 101(2):376-386.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  135. Early effect of Medicare Shared Savings Program accountable care organization participation on prostate cancer care. Cancer. 2018 02 01; 124(3):563-570.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  136. TrueNTH sexual recovery study protocol: a multi-institutional collaborative approach to developing and testing a web-based intervention for couples coping with the side-effects of prostate cancer treatment in a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2017 Oct 02; 17(1):664.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  137. The State of Men's Health Services in the Veterans Health Administration. Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Sep 18; 18(11):88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  138. Urologist Practice Affiliation and Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer in the Elderly. Eur Urol. 2018 04; 73(4):491-498.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  139. Functional Outcomes Following Nerve Sparing Prostatectomy Augmented with Seminal Vesicle Sparing Compared to Standard Nerve Sparing Prostatectomy: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Urol. 2017 09; 198(3):600-607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  140. Sharp Decline In Prostate Cancer Treatment Among Men In The General Population, But Not Among Diagnosed Men. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 01 01; 36(1):108-115.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  141. Potential Implications of Shortening Length of Stay Following Radical Cystectomy in a Pre-ERAS Population. Urology. 2017 04; 102:92-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  142. Accuracy of Prostate-Specific Antigen Values in Prostate Cancer Registries. J Clin Oncol. 2016 10 10; 34(29):3586-3587.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  143. Using Implementation Science to Examine the Impact of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans. J Clin Oncol. 2016 11 10; 34(32):3834-3837.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  144. Implications of evolving delivery system reforms for prostate cancer care. Am J Manag Care. 2016 Sep; 22(9):569-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  145. Health Care Integration and Quality among Men with Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2017 01; 197(1):55-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  146. Negative information-seeking experiences of long-term prostate cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2016 12; 10(6):1089-1095.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  147. Standardizing the definition of adverse pathology for lower risk men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. 2016 09; 34(9):415.e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  148. Limitations of Prostate-specific Antigen Testing After a Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. Eur Urol. 2016 08; 70(2):209-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  149. Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2016. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 01; 14(1):19-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  150. A Model to Optimize Followup Care and Reduce Hospital Readmissions after Radical Cystectomy. J Urol. 2016 May; 195(5):1362-1367.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  151. Expectant management of veterans with early-stage prostate cancer. Cancer. 2016 Feb 15; 122(4):626-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  152. Preparing Patients and Partners for Recovery From the Side Effects of Prostate Cancer Surgery: A Group Approach. Urology. 2016 Feb; 88:36-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  153. Patient-reported quality of life after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2015 Aug; 116(2):179-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  154. Veterans Affairs Telemedicine: Bringing Urologic Care to Remote Clinics. Urology. 2015 Aug; 86(2):255-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  155. Reply: To PMID 26168998. Urology. 2015 Aug; 86(2):260-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  156. Are we targeting the right outcome for sexual health after prostate cancer treatment? Eur Urol. 2015 Oct; 68(4):550-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  157. Survivorship and improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015 Sep; 68(3):374-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  158. Reducing PSA-Based Prostate Cancer Screening in Men Aged?75 Years and Older with the Use of Highly Specific Computerized Clinical Decision Support. J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug; 30(8):1133-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  159. What couples say about their recovery of sexual intimacy after prostatectomy: toward the development of a conceptual model of couples' sexual recovery after surgery for prostate cancer. J Sex Med. 2015 Feb; 12(2):494-504.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  160. Technology diffusion and prostate cancer quality of care. Urology. 2014 Nov; 84(5):1066-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  161. Understanding the relationship between tumor size, gland size, and disease aggressiveness in men with prostate cancer. Urology. 2014 Aug; 84(2):373-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  162. Exploring the role of the partner in couples' sexual recovery after surgery for prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2014 Sep; 22(9):2509-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  163. Adherence to performance measures and outcomes among men treated for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2014 Sep; 192(3):743-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  164. Validating electronic cancer quality measures at Veterans Health Administration. Am J Manag Care. 2014; 20(12):1041-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  165. Regional variation in quality of prostate cancer care. J Urol. 2014 Apr; 191(4):957-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  166. Use of advanced treatment technologies among men at low risk of dying from prostate cancer. JAMA. 2013 Jun 26; 309(24):2587-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  167. Technology diffusion and diagnostic testing for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2013 Nov; 190(5):1715-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  168. Managed care and the diffusion of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Urology. 2012 Dec; 80(6):1236-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  169. Certificate of need legislation and the dissemination of robotic surgery for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2013 Jan; 189(1):80-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  170. Hospitalization trends after prostate and bladder surgery: implications of potential payment reforms. J Urol. 2013 Jan; 189(1):59-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  171. Certificate of need regulations and the diffusion of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Urology. 2012 Nov; 80(5):1015-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  172. Comparative effectiveness of external-beam radiation approaches for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014 Jan; 65(1):162-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  173. Growth of high-cost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer raises concerns about overuse. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Apr; 31(4):750-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  174. Identifying better practices for early-stage bladder cancer. Med Care. 2011 Dec; 49(12):1112-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  175. Disparities in bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. 2012 Jan-Feb; 30(1):81-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  176. Editorial comment. Urology. 2011 Feb; 77(2):279.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  177. Understanding prostate cancer spending growth among Medicare beneficiaries. Urology. 2011 Feb; 77(2):326-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  178. Variation in use of lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Urology. 2011 Feb; 77(2):385-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  179. Delays in diagnosis and bladder cancer mortality. Cancer. 2010 Nov 15; 116(22):5235-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  180. Health care reform in 2010: transforming the delivery system to improve quality of care. World J Urol. 2011 Feb; 29(1):85-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  181. Percent microscopic tumor necrosis and survival after curative surgery for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2010 Mar; 183(3):909-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  182. The role of lymphovascular space invasion in renal cell carcinoma as a prognostic marker of survival after curative resection. Urol Oncol. 2011 Nov-Dec; 29(6):738-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  183. Transobturator sling with intraoperative cough test is effective for patients with low valsalva leak point pressure. Can J Urol. 2008 Aug; 15(4):4153-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.