Ted Skolarus to United States
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Ted Skolarus has written about United States.
Connection Strength
1.798
-
Understanding the Role of Urology Practice Organization and Racial Composition in Prostate Cancer Treatment Disparities. JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 05; 19(5):e763-e772.
Score: 0.087
-
Reframing Financial Incentives Around Reducing Readmission After Radical Cystectomy. Urology. 2020 08; 142:99-105.
Score: 0.073
-
Inaugural Readmission Penalties for Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty Procedures Under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 11 01; 2(11):e1916008.
Score: 0.070
-
Determinants of quality prostate cancer survivorship care across the primary and specialty care interface: Lessons from the Veterans Health Administration. Cancer Med. 2019 05; 8(5):2686-2702.
Score: 0.067
-
De-implementation of low value castration for men with prostate cancer: protocol for a theory-based, mixed methods approach to minimizing low value androgen deprivation therapy (DeADT). Implement Sci. 2018 11 29; 13(1):144.
Score: 0.066
-
Early National Dissemination of Abiraterone and Enzalutamide for Advanced Prostate Cancer in Medicare Part D. J Oncol Pract. 2017 08; 13(8):e694-e702.
Score: 0.059
-
Optimizing veteran-centered prostate cancer survivorship care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 04 18; 18(1):181.
Score: 0.059
-
No Differences in Population-based Readmissions After Open and Robotic-assisted Radical Cystectomy: Implications for Post-discharge Care. Urology. 2017 06; 104:77-83.
Score: 0.058
-
Variation in readmission expenditures after high-risk surgery. J Surg Res. 2017 06 01; 213:60-68.
Score: 0.058
-
Implications of Prostate Cancer Treatment in Men With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Urology. 2017 06; 104:131-136.
Score: 0.058
-
American Cancer Society prostate cancer survivorship care guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Jul-Aug; 64(4):225-49.
Score: 0.048
-
Sharpening the focus on causes and timing of readmission after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Cancer. 2014 May 01; 120(9):1409-16.
Score: 0.047
-
Quality of prostate cancer care among rural men in the Veterans Health Administration. Cancer. 2013 Oct 15; 119(20):3629-35.
Score: 0.045
-
Monitoring quality of life among prostate cancer survivors: the feasibility of automated telephone assessment. Urology. 2012 Nov; 80(5):1021-6.
Score: 0.043
-
Use of restaging bladder tumor resection for bladder cancer among Medicare beneficiaries. Urology. 2011 Dec; 78(6):1345-9.
Score: 0.040
-
Understanding fragmentation of prostate cancer survivorship care: implications for cost and quality. Cancer. 2012 Jun 01; 118(11):2837-45.
Score: 0.040
-
Primary care perspectives on prostate cancer screening. Nurse Pract. 2011 Jun; 36(6):39-44.
Score: 0.039
-
The delivery of prostate cancer care in the United States: implications for delivery system reform. J Urol. 2010 Dec; 184(6):2279-84.
Score: 0.037
-
Improving urologic cancer care. Urol Oncol. 2010 Jul-Aug; 28(4):347-9.
Score: 0.036
-
Regional differences in early stage bladder cancer care and outcomes. Urology. 2010 Aug; 76(2):391-6.
Score: 0.036
-
Attitudes and barriers toward video visits in surgical care: Insights from a nationwide survey among surgeons. Surgery. 2024 Jul; 176(1):115-123.
Score: 0.024
-
Industry Payments to Urologists and Urologic Advanced Practice Providers in 2021. Urology. 2023 10; 180:121-129.
Score: 0.023
-
Evaluation of emergency department treat-and-release encounters after major gastrointestinal surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug; 128(2):402-408.
Score: 0.022
-
Comparison of the treatment of men with prostate cancer between the US and England: an international population-based study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 06; 26(2):287-292.
Score: 0.020
-
Promotional Payments to Medical Oncologists and Urologists and Prescriptions for Abiraterone and Enzalutamide. Urology. 2022 03; 161:50-58.
Score: 0.020
-
Using an Automated Electronic Health Record Score To Estimate Life Expectancy In Men Diagnosed With Prostate Cancer In The Veterans Health Administration. Urology. 2021 09; 155:70-76.
Score: 0.020
-
Understanding Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 11; 17(11):e1678-e1687.
Score: 0.019
-
Variations in Persistent Use of Low-Value Breast Cancer Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2021 04 01; 156(4):353-362.
Score: 0.019
-
Urology Workforce Changes and Implications for Prostate Cancer Care Among Medicare Enrollees. Urology. 2021 09; 155:77-82.
Score: 0.019
-
Aligning Urology Residency Training With Real-World Workforce Needs. J Surg Educ. 2021 May-Jun; 78(3):820-827.
Score: 0.019
-
Demand for Surgical Procedures Following COVID-19: The Need for Operational Strategies That Optimize Resource Utilization and Value. Ann Surg. 2020 10; 272(4):e272-e274.
Score: 0.019
-
Adherence and out-of-pocket costs among Medicare beneficiaries who are prescribed oral targeted therapies for advanced prostate cancer. Cancer. 2020 12 01; 126(23):5050-5059.
Score: 0.019
-
Life expectancy estimates for patients diagnosed with prostate cancer in the Veterans Health Administration. Urol Oncol. 2020 09; 38(9):734.e1-734.e10.
Score: 0.018
-
Resurrecting immortal-time bias in the study of readmissions. Health Serv Res. 2020 04; 55(2):273-276.
Score: 0.018
-
Comparison of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 06; 18(3):201-209.e2.
Score: 0.018
-
Implications of Cystectomy Travel Distance for Hospital Readmission and Survival. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 12; 17(6):e1171-e1180.
Score: 0.017
-
External Validation of the Prostate Cancer Specific Comorbidity Index: A Claims Based Tool for the Prediction of Life Expectancy in Men with Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2019 09; 202(3):518-524.
Score: 0.017
-
Adoption of Abiraterone and Enzalutamide by Urologists. Urology. 2019 09; 131:176-183.
Score: 0.017
-
Association Between Hospital Participation in Medicare Shared Savings Program Accountable Care Organizations and Readmission Following Major Surgery. Ann Surg. 2019 05; 269(5):873-878.
Score: 0.017
-
Trends and appropriateness of perioperative chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. 2019 07; 37(7):462-469.
Score: 0.017
-
Urologist Practice Structure and Spending for Prostate Cancer Care. Urology. 2019 Aug; 130:65-71.
Score: 0.017
-
Population Analysis of Male Urethral Stricture Management and Urethroplasty Success in the United States. Urology. 2019 01; 123:258-264.
Score: 0.016
-
Variation in prostate cancer treatment and spending among Medicare shared savings program accountable care organizations. Cancer. 2018 08; 124(16):3364-3371.
Score: 0.016
-
Predictors and Cost of Readmission in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 09; 33(9):2759-2763.
Score: 0.016
-
Impact of Accountable Care Organizations on Diagnostic Testing for Prostate Cancer. Urology. 2018 06; 116:68-75.
Score: 0.016
-
The Research Implications of Prostate Specific Antigen Registry Errors: Data from the Veterans Health Administration. J Urol. 2018 09; 200(3):541-548.
Score: 0.016
-
Association of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program With Surgical Readmissions. JAMA Surg. 2018 03 01; 153(3):243-250.
Score: 0.016
-
Early effect of Medicare Shared Savings Program accountable care organization participation on prostate cancer care. Cancer. 2018 02 01; 124(3):563-570.
Score: 0.015
-
The State of Men's Health Services in the Veterans Health Administration. Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Sep 18; 18(11):88.
Score: 0.015
-
Urologist Practice Affiliation and Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer in the Elderly. Eur Urol. 2018 04; 73(4):491-498.
Score: 0.015
-
Sharp Decline In Prostate Cancer Treatment Among Men In The General Population, But Not Among Diagnosed Men. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 01 01; 36(1):108-115.
Score: 0.014
-
Accuracy of Prostate-Specific Antigen Values in Prostate Cancer Registries. J Clin Oncol. 2016 10 10; 34(29):3586-3587.
Score: 0.014
-
Implications of evolving delivery system reforms for prostate cancer care. Am J Manag Care. 2016 Sep; 22(9):569-75.
Score: 0.014
-
Health Care Integration and Quality among Men with Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2017 01; 197(1):55-60.
Score: 0.014
-
A Model to Optimize Followup Care and Reduce Hospital Readmissions after Radical Cystectomy. J Urol. 2016 May; 195(5):1362-1367.
Score: 0.013
-
Expectant management of veterans with early-stage prostate cancer. Cancer. 2016 Feb 15; 122(4):626-33.
Score: 0.013
-
Veterans Affairs Telemedicine: Bringing Urologic Care to Remote Clinics. Urology. 2015 Aug; 86(2):255-60.
Score: 0.013
-
Technology diffusion and prostate cancer quality of care. Urology. 2014 Nov; 84(5):1066-72.
Score: 0.012
-
Validating electronic cancer quality measures at Veterans Health Administration. Am J Manag Care. 2014; 20(12):1041-7.
Score: 0.012
-
Regional variation in quality of prostate cancer care. J Urol. 2014 Apr; 191(4):957-62.
Score: 0.012
-
Use of advanced treatment technologies among men at low risk of dying from prostate cancer. JAMA. 2013 Jun 26; 309(24):2587-95.
Score: 0.011
-
Managed care and the diffusion of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Urology. 2012 Dec; 80(6):1236-42.
Score: 0.011
-
Certificate of need regulations and the diffusion of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Urology. 2012 Nov; 80(5):1015-20.
Score: 0.011
-
Growth of high-cost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer raises concerns about overuse. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Apr; 31(4):750-9.
Score: 0.010
-
Understanding prostate cancer spending growth among Medicare beneficiaries. Urology. 2011 Feb; 77(2):326-31.
Score: 0.009
-
Health care reform in 2010: transforming the delivery system to improve quality of care. World J Urol. 2011 Feb; 29(1):85-90.
Score: 0.009