The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Ryan Merkow to Male

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Ryan Merkow has written about Male.
Ryan Merkow
Connection Strength
1.332
Male
  1. Divergent Trends in Postoperative Length of Stay and Postdischarge Complications over Time. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024 Sep; 50(9):630-637.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  2. Association of pathologic factors with postoperative venous thromboembolism after gastrointestinal cancer surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jun; 28(6):813-819.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  3. The Use of Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy for Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. Cancer Treat Res. 2024; 192:265-276.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  4. Safety and feasibility of establishing an adjuvant hepatic artery infusion program. HPB (Oxford). 2024 05; 26(5):656-663.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  5. Necessity of posttreatment surveillance for low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms. J Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec; 124(7):1115-1120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  6. A postdischarge venous thromboembolism risk calculator for inflammatory bowel disease surgery. Surgery. 2021 02; 169(2):240-247.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  7. Short-Term Risk of Performing Concurrent Procedures with Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Placement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec; 27(13):5098-5106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  8. Post Hepatectomy Liver Failure Risk Calculator for Preoperative and Early Postoperative Period Following Major Hepatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug; 27(8):2868-2876.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  9. Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Its Association with Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 02; 24(2):243-252.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  10. Pre-Operative, Intra-Operative, and Post-Operative Factors Associated with Post-Discharge Venous Thromboembolism Following Colorectal Cancer Resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 01; 24(1):144-154.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  11. Failure to administer recommended chemotherapy: acceptable variation or cancer care quality blind spot? BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 02; 29(2):103-112.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  12. Association of preoperative biliary drainage technique with postoperative outcomes among patients with resectable hepatobiliary malignancy. HPB (Oxford). 2020 02; 22(2):249-257.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  13. Utilization and Treatment Patterns of Cytoreduction Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan; 27(1):214-221.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  14. Endoscopic Ultrasound as a Pretreatment Clinical Staging Tool for Gastric Cancer: Association with Pathology and Outcome. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov; 24(12):3658-3666.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  15. Reply to Letter: "Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Colorectal Cancer Resection: A UK Perspective". Ann Surg. 2016 Feb; 263(2):e27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  16. Reply to Letter: "Ability to Prevent Death as a Sequelae of Morbidity May Be an Additional Indicator of Hospital Quality". Ann Surg. 2015 Jun; 261(6):e158-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  17. Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United States. JAMA. 2015 Feb 03; 313(5):483-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  18. Postoperative complications reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use in resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2014 Aug; 260(2):372-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  19. Treatment trends, risk of lymph node metastasis, and outcomes for localized esophageal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Jul; 106(7).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  20. Adherence with postdischarge venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis recommendations after colorectal cancer surgery among elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Ann Surg. 2014 Jul; 260(1):103-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  21. Relationship between cancer center accreditation and performance on publicly reported quality measures. Ann Surg. 2014 Jun; 259(6):1091-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  22. Is there a role for extended venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis in IBD? Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Apr; 57(4):413-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  23. National assessment of margin status as a quality indicator after pancreatic cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Apr; 21(4):1067-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  24. Effect of postoperative complications on adjuvant chemotherapy use for stage III colon cancer. Ann Surg. 2013 Dec; 258(6):847-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  25. Differences in patients, surgical complexity, and outcomes after cancer surgery at National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers compared to other hospitals. Med Care. 2013 Jul; 51(7):606-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  26. Validity and feasibility of the american college of surgeons colectomy composite outcome quality measure. Ann Surg. 2013 Mar; 257(3):483-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  27. Efficiency of colorectal cancer care among veterans: analysis of treatment wait times at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. J Oncol Pract. 2013 Jul; 9(4):e154-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  28. Effect of including cancer-specific variables on risk-adjusted hospital surgical quality comparisons. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun; 20(6):1766-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  29. Effect of including cancer-specific variables on models examining short-term outcomes. Cancer. 2013 Apr 01; 119(7):1412-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  30. Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation. Arch Surg. 2012 Nov; 147(11):1009-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  31. Variation in lymph node examination after esophagectomy for cancer in the United States. Arch Surg. 2012 Jun; 147(6):505-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  32. Relevance of the c-statistic when evaluating risk-adjustment models in surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 May; 214(5):822-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  33. Interpretation of the C-statistic in the context of ACS-NSQIP models. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec; 18 Suppl 3:S295; author reply S296.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  34. Effect of histologic subtype on treatment and outcomes for esophageal cancer in the United States. Cancer. 2012 Jul 01; 118(13):3268-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  35. Use of multimodality neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer in the United States: assessment of 987 hospitals. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Feb; 19(2):357-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  36. Post-discharge venous thromboembolism after cancer surgery: extending the case for extended prophylaxis. Ann Surg. 2011 Jul; 254(1):131-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  37. Variability in reoperation rates at 182 hospitals: a potential target for quality improvement. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Nov; 209(5):557-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  38. Effect of body mass index on short-term outcomes after colectomy for cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Jan; 208(1):53-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  39. Survival Among Patients With High-Risk Gastrointestinal Cancers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 03 04; 7(3):e240160.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  40. Alterations in Cancer Treatment During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 10 02; 6(10):e2340148.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  41. Venous Thromboembolism Chemoprophylaxis Adherence Rates After Major Cancer Surgery. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 09 05; 6(9):e2335311.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  42. Association of Surgical Resident Wellness With Medical Errors and Patient Outcomes. Ann Surg. 2021 08 01; 274(2):396-402.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  43. National Evaluation of Patient Preferences in Selecting Hospitals and Health Care Providers. Med Care. 2020 10; 58(10):867-873.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  44. Adequate Lymphadenectomy as a Quality Measure in Esophageal Cancer: Is there an Association with Treatment Approach? Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct; 27(11):4443-4456.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  45. Association between surgical approach and survival following resection of abdominopelvic malignancies. J Surg Oncol. 2020 Mar; 121(4):620-629.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  46. Margin Positivity in Resectable Esophageal Cancer: Are there Modifiable Risk Factors? Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 May; 27(5):1496-1507.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  47. National Use of Chemotherapy in Initial Management of Stage I Pancreatic Cancer and Failure to Perform Subsequent Resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Mar; 27(3):909-918.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  48. A comprehensive national survey on thoughts of leaving residency, alternative career paths, and reasons for staying in general surgery training. Am J Surg. 2020 02; 219(2):227-232.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  49. An Empirical National Assessment of the Learning Environment and Factors Associated With Program Culture. Ann Surg. 2019 10; 270(4):585-592.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  50. Post-operative complications and readmissions following outpatient elective Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2020 05; 34(5):2143-2148.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  51. Preoperative risk evaluation for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun; 119(8):1128-1134.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  52. Laparoscopic Liver Resection Difficulty Score-a Validation Study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 03; 23(3):545-555.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  53. National practice patterns of completion lymph node dissection for sentinel node-positive melanoma. J Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep; 118(3):493-500.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  54. Does Second Reader Opinion Affect Patient Management in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma? Acad Radiol. 2018 07; 25(7):825-832.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  55. Evaluation of readmissions due to surgical site infections: A potential target for quality improvement. Am J Surg. 2017 Nov; 214(5):773-779.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  56. Doubling of 30-Day Mortality by 90 Days After Esophagectomy: A Critical Measure of Outcomes for Quality Improvement. Ann Surg. 2016 Feb; 263(2):286-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  57. Effect of post-discharge venous thromboembolism on hospital quality comparisons following hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Sep 03; 96(17):1476-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  58. Comparison of postoperative complication risk prediction approaches based on factors known preoperatively to surgeons versus patients. Surgery. 2014 Jul; 156(1):39-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  59. Impact of hepatectomy surgical complexity on outcomes and hospital quality rankings. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun; 21(6):1773-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  60. An opportunity to ensure high-quality melanoma care through the use of a preoperative treatment algorithm. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Nov; 20(12):3976-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  61. Assessment of advanced gastric cancer management in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jul; 20(7):2124-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  62. Validation of new readmission data in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Mar; 216(3):420-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  63. Is Illinois heeding the call to regionalize pancreatic surgery? J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun; 107(7):685-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  64. Association between postoperative complications and reoperation for patients undergoing geriatric surgery and the effect of reoperation on mortality. Am Surg. 2012 Oct; 78(10):1137-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  65. Cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma and potential opportunities for improvement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Nov; 19(12):3659-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  66. Treatment trends and predictors of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for gastric adenocarcinoma in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Feb; 20(2):362-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  67. Factors affecting selection of operative approach and subsequent short-term outcomes after anatomic resection for lung cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Aug; 215(2):206-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  68. First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg. 2011 Sep; 254(3):410-20; discussion 420-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  69. Incorporation of adjuvant therapy into the multimodality management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan; 19(1):184-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  70. Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes from 121 hospitals. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Nov; 12(11):2001-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  71. Quality of pancreatic cancer care at Veterans Administration compared with non-Veterans Administration hospitals. Am J Surg. 2007 Nov; 194(5):588-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  72. Clinicopathologic features and treatment trends of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: analysis of 9,821 patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Nov; 11(11):1460-7; discussion 1467-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  73. Application of the pancreatic adenocarcinoma staging system to pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Oct; 205(4):558-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  74. Size of sentinel node metastases predicts other nodal disease and survival in malignant melanoma. Am J Surg. 2006 Dec; 192(6):878-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.