The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Christina Lewicky-Gaupp to Aged

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Christina Lewicky-Gaupp has written about Aged.
Christina Lewicky-Gaupp
Connection Strength
0.438
Aged
  1. Fecal incontinence in older women: are levator ani defects a factor? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 May; 202(5):491.e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  2. Structural position of the posterior vagina and pelvic floor in women with and without posterior vaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 May; 202(5):497.e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  3. Self-perceived natural history of pelvic organ prolapse described by women presenting for treatment. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Aug; 20(8):927-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  4. Anal sphincter structure and function relationships in aging and fecal incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May; 200(5):559.e1-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  5. Successful physical therapy for constipation related to puborectalis dyssynergia improves symptom severity and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Nov; 51(11):1686-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  6. Does a Hysterectomy Hurt? Comparing Narcotic Requirements and Pain Scores in Patients Undergoing Apical Prolapse Repair With or Without Hysterectomy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 06 01; 27(6):356-359.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  7. Rates of Sling Procedures and Revisions-A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database Study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 06 01; 27(6):e559-e562.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  8. The Influence of Patients' Goals on Surgical Satisfaction. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 03 01; 27(3):170-174.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  9. Restricted Convalescence Following Urogynecologic Procedures: 1-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Controlled Study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 02 01; 27(2):e336-e341.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  10. Impact of a Web-Based Decisional Aid on Satisfaction in Women Undergoing Prolapse Surgery. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 02 01; 27(2):e309-e314.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  11. Mind the Gap: Changes in Levator Dimensions After Sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 01 01; 27(1):e184-e186.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  12. The First Injection: Rates of Urinary Retention in Women With Urgency Incontinence Treated With Intravesical OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 01 01; 27(1):e118-e121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  13. Translation and validation of the Polish version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire short form 7. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Dec; 32(12):3177-3181.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  14. Clinical Utility of Routine Preoperative Laboratory Assessment in a Urogynecologic Population. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 09; 26(9):550-553.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  15. Permanent Compared With Absorbable Suture for Vaginal Mesh Fixation During Total Hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 08; 136(2):355-364.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  16. The Promise of PROMIS in Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Nov-Dec; 25(6):426-429.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  17. Minimizing Risks in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Rates of Surgical Site Infection Across Subtypes of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep - Oct; 27(6):1370-1376.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  18. Concomitant Repair of Pelvic Floor Disorders in Women Undergoing Surgery for Gynecologic Malignancies. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Sep-Oct; 25(5):362-364.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  19. Validation of the Polish version of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Jan; 30(1):101-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  20. Recovering sexual satisfaction after prolapse surgery: a secondary analysis of surgical recovery. Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Nov; 29(11):1675-1680.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  21. Changing Referral Patterns to Urogynecology. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jan-Feb; 24(1):48-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  22. Baseline Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients Enrolled in LURN: A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study. J Urol. 2018 04; 199(4):1023-1031.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  23. Activity Restriction Recommendations and Outcomes After Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 04; 129(4):608-614.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  24. Urinary Microbiome and Cytokine Levels in Women With Interstitial Cystitis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 03; 129(3):500-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  25. Characterizing Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Adult Spina Bifida Patients. Urology. 2016 11; 97:273-276.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  26. Postoperative appointments: which ones count? Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Dec; 27(12):1873-1877.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  27. Comparison of the puborectal muscle on MRI in women with POP and levator ani defects with those with normal support and no defect. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Jan; 23(1):73-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  28. Vaginal support as determined by levator ani defect status 6 weeks after primary surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Aug; 114(2):141-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  29. Perineal body anatomy in living women: 3-dimensional analysis using thin-slice magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov; 203(5):494.e15-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  30. Complications requiring reoperation following vaginal mesh kit procedures for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec; 199(6):678.e1-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.