The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Christina Lewicky-Gaupp and Margaret Mueller.
Christina Lewicky-Gaupp
Connection Strength
3.727
Margaret Mueller
  1. Sex Differences in Commercial Patient Reviews of Women and Men Urogynecologic Surgeons. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022 03 01; 28(3):173-176.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.215
  2. Bare Versus Hair: Do Pubic Hair Grooming Preferences Dictate the Urogenital Microbiome? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 09 01; 27(9):532-537.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.208
  3. Does a Hysterectomy Hurt? Comparing Narcotic Requirements and Pain Scores in Patients Undergoing Apical Prolapse Repair With or Without Hysterectomy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 06 01; 27(6):356-359.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.204
  4. Postpartum contraceptive uptake and fertility desires following obstetric anal sphincter injury. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 07; 32(7):1833-1838.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.202
  5. Restricted Convalescence Following Urogynecologic Procedures: 1-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Controlled Study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 02 01; 27(2):e336-e341.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  6. Early Secondary Repair of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Breakdown: Contemporary Surgical Techniques and Experiences From a Peripartum Subspecialty Clinic. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 02 01; 27(2):e333-e335.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  7. The Promise of PROMIS in Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Nov-Dec; 25(6):426-429.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  8. Minimizing Risks in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Rates of Surgical Site Infection Across Subtypes of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep - Oct; 27(6):1370-1376.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  9. Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Women With Female Genital Mutilation. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar-Apr; 25(2):157-160.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  10. Recovering sexual satisfaction after prolapse surgery: a secondary analysis of surgical recovery. Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Nov; 29(11):1675-1680.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  11. Anal Penetrative Intercourse as a Risk Factor for Fecal Incontinence. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 May-Jun; 24(3):252-255.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  12. Activity Restriction Recommendations and Outcomes After Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 04; 129(4):608-614.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  13. Postoperative appointments: which ones count? Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Dec; 27(12):1873-1877.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  14. Use of a Computerized Decisional Analysis Tool in Patients With Urgency Urinary Incontinence. Urogynecology (Phila). 2023 09 01; 29(9):757-762.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  15. Patient Satisfaction With Telehealth Visits for New Patient Appointments for Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Randomized Trial of Telehealth Versus Standard In-Person Office Visits. Urogynecology (Phila). 2023 02 01; 29(2):273-280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  16. Mesh complications after total vs supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy at time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 09; 33(9):2507-2514.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  17. Vaginal Electrical Stimulation for Postpartum Neuromuscular Recovery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 11 01; 27(11):659-666.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  18. Adding Insult to Injury: Levator Ani Avulsion in Women With Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 07 01; 27(7):462-467.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  19. Rates of Sling Procedures and Revisions-A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database Study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 06 01; 27(6):e559-e562.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  20. The Influence of Patients' Goals on Surgical Satisfaction. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 03 01; 27(3):170-174.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  21. Treat or Wait? Natural Perioperative Course of Overactive Bladder Symptoms at the Time of Midurethral Sling Placement. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 02 01; 27(2):e348-e351.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  22. Impact of a Web-Based Decisional Aid on Satisfaction in Women Undergoing Prolapse Surgery. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 02 01; 27(2):e309-e314.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  23. Fibroids and Urinary Symptoms Study (FUSS). Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 02 01; 27(2):e481-e483.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  24. Prevalence of childhood trauma and its association with lower urinary tract symptoms in women and men in the LURN study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021 02; 40(2):632-641.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  25. Concurrent Retropubic Midurethral Sling and OnabotulinumtoxinA for Mixed Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 01 01; 137(1):12-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  26. Mind the Gap: Changes in Levator Dimensions After Sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 01 01; 27(1):e184-e186.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  27. The First Injection: Rates of Urinary Retention in Women With Urgency Incontinence Treated With Intravesical OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 01 01; 27(1):e118-e121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  28. Translation and validation of the Polish version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire short form 7. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Dec; 32(12):3177-3181.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  29. Clinical Utility of Routine Preoperative Laboratory Assessment in a Urogynecologic Population. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 09; 26(9):550-553.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  30. Patients' Perceptions on Surgical Care Suspension for Pelvic Floor Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 08; 26(8):477-482.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  31. Permanent Compared With Absorbable Suture for Vaginal Mesh Fixation During Total Hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 08; 136(2):355-364.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  32. Truth or Myth: Intra-abdominal Pressure Increases in the Lithotomy Position. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 01; 28(1):26-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  33. Duration of Catheterization After Retropubic Midurethral Sling. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Sep-Oct; 25(5):369-371.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  34. Concomitant Repair of Pelvic Floor Disorders in Women Undergoing Surgery for Gynecologic Malignancies. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Sep-Oct; 25(5):362-364.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  35. Validation of the Polish version of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Jan; 30(1):101-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  36. Operating Room Efficiency: Examining the Impact of Personnel Handoffs. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Mar-Apr; 24(2):87-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  37. Changing Referral Patterns to Urogynecology. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jan-Feb; 24(1):48-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  38. Urinary Microbiome and Cytokine Levels in Women With Interstitial Cystitis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 03; 129(3):500-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  39. Factors Associated With Timing of Return to Intercourse After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries. J Sex Med. 2016 10; 13(10):1523-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  40. Anal Sphincter Injuries After Operative Vaginal Versus Spontaneous Delivery-Is There a Difference in Postpartum Symptoms? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jul-Aug; 22(4):194-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  41. Effect of anesthesia type on perioperative outcomes with a midurethral sling. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Sep; 27(9):1327-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.