The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Folker Meyer to Computational Biology

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Folker Meyer has written about Computational Biology.
Folker Meyer
Connection Strength
1.775
Computational Biology
  1. A metagenomics portal for a democratized sequencing world. Methods Enzymol. 2013; 531:487-523.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.349
  2. From genomics to metagenomics. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2012 Feb; 23(1):72-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.326
  3. Using the metagenomics RAST server (MG-RAST) for analyzing shotgun metagenomes. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2010 Jan; 2010(1):pdb.prot5368.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.283
  4. MG-RAST version 4-lessons learned from a decade of low-budget ultra-high-throughput metagenome analysis. Brief Bioinform. 2019 07 19; 20(4):1151-1159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  5. KBase: The United States Department of Energy Systems Biology Knowledgebase. Nat Biotechnol. 2018 07 06; 36(7):566-569.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  6. MG-RAST, a Metagenomics Service for Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function. Methods Mol Biol. 2016; 1399:207-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  7. The M5nr: a novel non-redundant database containing protein sequences and annotations from multiple sources and associated tools. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 Jun 21; 13:141.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  8. A platform-independent method for detecting errors in metagenomic sequencing data: DRISEE. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012; 8(6):e1002541.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  9. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008 Feb 08; 9:75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  10. GenDB--an open source genome annotation system for prokaryote genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Apr 15; 31(8):2187-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  11. Federation in genomics pipelines: techniques and challenges. Brief Bioinform. 2019 01 18; 20(1):235-244.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  12. Unlocking the potential of metagenomics through replicated experimental design. Nat Biotechnol. 2012 Jun 07; 30(6):513-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  13. Functional analysis of metagenomes and metatranscriptomes using SEED and KEGG. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Feb 15; 12 Suppl 1:S21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  14. The future of microbial metagenomics (or is ignorance bliss?). ISME J. 2011 May; 5(5):777-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  15. The Sequence Analysis and Management System -- SAMS-2.0: data management and sequence analysis adapted to changing requirements from traditional sanger sequencing to ultrafast sequencing technologies. J Biotechnol. 2009 Mar 10; 140(1-2):3-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  16. Genome of the epsilonproteobacterial chemolithoautotroph Sulfurimonas denitrificans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Feb; 74(4):1145-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  17. The subsystems approach to genome annotation and its use in the project to annotate 1000 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33(17):5691-702.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  18. A predator unmasked: life cycle of Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus from a genomic perspective. Science. 2004 Jan 30; 303(5658):689-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  19. Whole genome shotgun sequencing guided by bioinformatics pipelines--an optimized approach for an established technique. J Biotechnol. 2003 Dec 19; 106(2-3):121-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  20. PathFinder: reconstruction and dynamic visualization of metabolic pathways. Bioinformatics. 2002 Jan; 18(1):124-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.