The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Matthew Stephens to Models, Statistical

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Matthew Stephens has written about Models, Statistical.
Connection Strength

1.874
  1. Empirical Bayes shrinkage and false discovery rate estimation, allowing for unwanted variation. Biostatistics. 2020 01 01; 21(1):15-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.552
  2. False discovery rates: a new deal. Biostatistics. 2017 04 01; 18(2):275-294.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.456
  3. A unified framework for association analysis with multiple related phenotypes. PLoS One. 2013; 8(7):e65245.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.352
  4. A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Am J Hum Genet. 2006 Apr; 78(4):629-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.211
  5. A Simple Model-Based Approach to Inferring and Visualizing Cancer Mutation Signatures. PLoS Genet. 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1005657.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  6. Practical issues in imputation-based association mapping. PLoS Genet. 2008 Dec; 4(12):e1000279.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  7. Imputation-based analysis of association studies: candidate regions and quantitative traits. PLoS Genet. 2007 Jul; 3(7):e114.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  8. Mendelian randomization accounting for correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects using genome-wide summary statistics. Nat Genet. 2020 07; 52(7):740-747.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  9. Accurate genomic prediction of Coffea canephora in multiple environments using whole-genome statistical models. Heredity (Edinb). 2019 03; 122(3):261-275.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  10. Probabilistic segmentation and intensity estimation for microarray images. Biostatistics. 2006 Jan; 7(1):85-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.