The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Marcus R. Kronforst to Genetic Speciation

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Marcus R. Kronforst has written about Genetic Speciation.
Connection Strength

2.268
  1. Genome-wide introgression among distantly related Heliconius butterfly species. Genome Biol. 2016 Feb 27; 17:25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.499
  2. Hybridization reveals the evolving genomic architecture of speciation. Cell Rep. 2013 Nov 14; 5(3):666-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.425
  3. Genome-wide characterization of adaptation and speciation in tiger swallowtail butterflies using de novo transcriptome assemblies. Genome Biol Evol. 2013; 5(6):1233-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.401
  4. Polymorphic butterfly reveals the missing link in ecological speciation. Science. 2009 Nov 06; 326(5954):847-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.322
  5. Gene flow persists millions of years after speciation in Heliconius butterflies. BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Mar 27; 8:98.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.288
  6. Sex chromosome mosaicism and hybrid speciation among tiger swallowtail butterflies. PLoS Genet. 2011 Sep; 7(9):e1002274.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  7. Genetic diversity in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum: population differentiation and cryptic species. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2011 Sep; 60(3):455-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  8. Gene flow and the genealogical history of Heliconius heurippa. BMC Evol Biol. 2008 May 02; 8:132.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  9. Genomic architecture and introgression shape a butterfly radiation. Science. 2019 11 01; 366(6465):594-599.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  10. Comparative Transcriptomics Provides Insights into Reticulate and Adaptive Evolution of a Butterfly Radiation. Genome Biol Evol. 2019 10 01; 11(10):2963-2975.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.