The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Mitchell C. Posner to Prognosis

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Mitchell C. Posner has written about Prognosis.
Mitchell C. Posner
Connection Strength
0.711
Prognosis
  1. For Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers, Does an "Esophageal" or "Gastric" Surgical Approach Offer Better Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes? Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Feb; 27(2):511-517.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  2. Adjuvant Therapy Improves Survival for T2N0 Gastric Cancer Patients with Sub-optimal Lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 06; 23(6):1956-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  3. Defining the Benefit of Adjuvant Therapy Following Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul; 22(7):2209-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  4. Controversies and role of HPV16 in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell cancers of the head and neck. Ann Oncol. 2014 Aug; 25(8):1667-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  5. Modern treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec 14; 18(46):6720-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  6. The staging of gastric cancer: nothing novel but perhaps better. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003 Nov; 10(9):1005-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  7. Surgical treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the imatinib (STI-571) era. Surgery. 2003 Oct; 134(4):656-65; discussion 665-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  8. Utility of Perioperative Measurement of Cell-Free DNA and Circulating Tumor DNA in Informing the Prognosis of GI Cancers: A Systematic Review. JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 02; 6:e2100337.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  9. Complete 5-year follow-up of a prospective phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Surgery. 2001 Oct; 130(4):620-6; discussion 626-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  10. Hepatic resection: effective treatment for primary and secondary tumors. Surgery. 2000 Oct; 128(4):686-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  11. Comparative Age-Based Prospective Multi-Institutional Observations of 12,367 Patients Enrolled to the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z901101 Trials (Alliance). Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec; 26(13):4213-4221.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  12. p53 sequence analysis predicts treatment response and outcome of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer. 1998 Jul 01; 83(1):7-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  13. Basal Tumor Cell Isolation and Patient-Derived Xenograft Engraftment Identify High-Risk Clinical Bladder Cancers. Sci Rep. 2016 10 24; 6:35854.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  14. Geriatric assessment improves prediction of surgical outcomes in older adults undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg. 2014 May; 259(5):960-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  15. Cancer recurrence: an important but missing variable in national cancer registries. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 May; 21(5):1520-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  16. National assessment of margin status as a quality indicator after pancreatic cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Apr; 21(4):1067-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  17. Predictors of unsuccessful laparoscopic resection of gastric submucosal neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Feb; 17(2):244-55; discussion 255-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  18. A RAND/UCLA appropriateness study of the management of familial gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Feb; 20(2):533-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  19. Should internal mammary nodes be sampled in the sentinel lymph node era? Ann Surg Oncol. 2000 Apr; 7(3):188-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  20. Combined modality therapy for stage IIIA non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. Eur J Cancer. 1993; 29A(4):511-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  21. Parotid enlargement in children seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus: imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Sep; 157(3):553-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.