The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Jon E. Grant to Psychometrics

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jon E. Grant has written about Psychometrics.
Connection Strength

1.308
  1. Compulsivity is measurable across distinct psychiatric symptom domains and is associated with familial risk and reward-related attentional capture. CNS Spectr. 2020 08; 25(4):519-526.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  2. Minnesota Impulse Disorders Interview (MIDI): Validation of a structured diagnostic clinical interview for impulse control disorders in an enriched community sample. Psychiatry Res. 2018 07; 265:279-283.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  3. Examining the psychometric properties of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale in a sample of compulsive pornography users. Compr Psychiatry. 2015 May; 59:117-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  4. Neurocognitive deficits associated with shoplifting in young adults. Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Nov; 53(8):1049-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  5. Cognitive task performance and frequency of alcohol usage in young adults. J Addict Med. 2012 Jun; 6(2):106-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  6. Strategic vs nonstrategic gambling: characteristics of pathological gamblers based on gambling preference. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2011 May; 23(2):105-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  7. N-acetylcysteine, a glutamate modulator, in the treatment of trichotillomania: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Jul; 66(7):756-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  8. Predicting response to opiate antagonists and placebo in the treatment of pathological gambling. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008 Nov; 200(4):521-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  9. A Structured Clinical Interview for Kleptomania (SCI-K): preliminary validity and reliability testing. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2006 Jun; 15(2):83-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  10. Preliminary validity and reliability testing of a structured clinical interview for pathological gambling. Psychiatry Res. 2004 Aug 30; 128(1):79-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  11. Dissociative symptoms in kleptomania. Psychol Rep. 2004 Feb; 94(1):77-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  12. A cross-national validation of the Internet Severity and Activities Addiction Questionnaire (ISAAQ). Compr Psychiatry. 2023 04; 122:152378.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  13. Internet severity and activities addiction questionnaire (ISAAQ): Psychometrics of item response theory and clustering of online activities. Compr Psychiatry. 2023 04; 122:152366.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  14. Measurement of the problematic usage of the Internet unidimensional quasitrait continuum with item response theory. Psychol Assess. 2021 Jul; 33(7):652-671.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  15. Trans-diagnostic measurement of impulsivity and compulsivity: A review of self-report tools. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 01; 120:455-469.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  16. Problematic use of the Internet is a unidimensional quasi-trait with impulsive and compulsive subtypes. BMC Psychiatry. 2019 11 08; 19(1):348.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  17. Symptom dimensions in OCD: item-level factor analysis and heritability estimates. Behav Genet. 2010 Jul; 40(4):505-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  18. A pilot study of impulsivity and compulsivity in pathological gambling. Psychiatry Res. 2009 May 15; 167(1-2):161-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  19. The Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale (G-SAS): a reliability and validity study. Psychiatry Res. 2009 Mar 31; 166(1):76-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  20. Reliability and validity of the pathological gambling adaptation of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (PG-YBOCS). J Gambl Stud. 2005; 21(4):431-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.