Gregory Zagaja to Laparoscopy
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Gregory Zagaja has written about Laparoscopy.
Connection Strength
2.754
-
The impact of days off between cases on perioperative outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2016 Feb; 34(2):269-74.
Score: 0.305
-
Robotic-assisted pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: frequency of nodal metastases and oncological outcomes. World J Urol. 2015 Nov; 33(11):1689-94.
Score: 0.299
-
Early removal of urethral catheter with suprapubic tube drainage versus urethral catheter drainage alone after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2014 Jul; 192(1):89-95.
Score: 0.277
-
Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy: complete intracorporeal--initial case report. Urology. 2008 Nov; 72(5):1144-7; discussion 1147.
Score: 0.192
-
Sural nerve grafting in robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: interim report. J Endourol. 2007 Dec; 21(12):1547-51.
Score: 0.181
-
Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology. 2007 Feb; 69(2):300-5.
Score: 0.171
-
"Robotic fatigue?" - The impact of case order on positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. 2021 06; 39(6):365.e17-365.e23.
Score: 0.111
-
Continence outcomes in patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy. J Urol. 2011 Apr; 185(4):1438-43.
Score: 0.057
-
Management of the ventriculo-peritoneal shunt in pediatric patients during robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic procedures. J Endourol. 2011 Feb; 25(2):225-9.
Score: 0.056
-
Impact of prostate weight on probability of positive surgical margins in patients with low-risk prostate cancer after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2011 Mar; 77(3):677-81.
Score: 0.056
-
Paediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy (RALIMA): feasibility of and initial experience with the University of Chicago technique. BJU Int. 2011 Mar; 107(6):962-9.
Score: 0.055
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic intracorporeal hand-sewn bowel anastomosis during pediatric bladder reconstructive surgery. J Endourol. 2010 Aug; 24(8):1325-8.
Score: 0.054
-
Total laparorobotic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with sac exclusion obliteration and aortobifemoral bypass. Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 Sep-Oct; 23(5):686.e11-6.
Score: 0.051
-
Extrafascial versus interfascial nerve-sparing technique for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparison of functional outcomes and positive surgical margins characteristics. Urology. 2009 Sep; 74(3):611-6.
Score: 0.051
-
Trifecta outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology. 2009 Sep; 74(3):619-23.
Score: 0.051
-
Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes. Urology. 2009 Feb; 73(2):316-22.
Score: 0.048
-
Urinary and sexual quality of life 1 year following robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008 Aug; 180(2):663-7.
Score: 0.047
-
Planned nerve preservation to reduce positive surgical margins during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2008 Jun; 22(6):1303-9.
Score: 0.047
-
Long-term functional and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing sural nerve interposition grafting during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2008 May; 22(5):1005-12.
Score: 0.047
-
Surgeons' perceptions and injuries during and after urologic laparoscopic surgery. Urology. 2008 Mar; 71(3):404-7.
Score: 0.046
-
Bladder neck contracture after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: evaluation of incidence and risk factors and impact on urinary function. J Endourol. 2008 Feb; 22(2):377-83.
Score: 0.046
-
Use of the Endoholder device during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the "poor man's" fourth arm equivalent. J Endourol. 2008 Feb; 22(2):385-8.
Score: 0.046
-
Bladder neck contracture after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: evaluation of incidence and risk factors and impact on urinary function. J Endourol. 2008 Jan; 22(1):97-104.
Score: 0.046
-
Da Vinci robot error and failure rates: single institution experience on a single three-arm robot unit of more than 700 consecutive robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. J Endourol. 2007 Nov; 21(11):1341-4.
Score: 0.045
-
Prostate weight: an independent predictor for positive surgical margins during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Can J Urol. 2007 Oct; 14(5):3697-701.
Score: 0.045
-
Early laparoscopic management of acute postoperative hemorrhage after initial laparoscopic surgery. J Endourol. 2007 Aug; 21(8):872-8.
Score: 0.044
-
Robotic radical prostatectomy learning curve of a fellowship-trained laparoscopic surgeon. J Endourol. 2007 Apr; 21(4):441-7.
Score: 0.043
-
Focus on details. Eliminating knot-tying during the vesico-urethral anastomosis in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2007 Feb; 99(2):483-5.
Score: 0.043
-
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur Urol. 2007 Mar; 51(3):755-62; discussion 763.
Score: 0.042
-
Minimizing knot tying during reconstructive laparoscopic urology. Urology. 2006 Sep; 68(3):508-13.
Score: 0.042
-
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients. Urology. 2006 Apr; 67(4):774-9.
Score: 0.040
-
Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation. Urology. 2005 Aug; 66(2):419-23.
Score: 0.039
-
Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for biopsy Gleason 8 to 10: prediction of favorable pathologic outcome with preoperative parameters. J Endourol. 2008 Jul; 22(7):1477-81.
Score: 0.012
-
Urinary and sexual function outcomes among different age groups after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2008 Mar; 22(3):519-24.
Score: 0.012
-
Predicting the risk of patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 to harbor a higher grade cancer. J Urol. 2007 Nov; 178(5):1925-8.
Score: 0.011