The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Gregory Zagaja and Arieh Shalhav.
Gregory Zagaja
Connection Strength
3.533
Arieh Shalhav
  1. Robotic-assisted pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: frequency of nodal metastases and oncological outcomes. World J Urol. 2015 Nov; 33(11):1689-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  2. Early removal of urethral catheter with suprapubic tube drainage versus urethral catheter drainage alone after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2014 Jul; 192(1):89-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  3. How accurate is our clinical prediction of "minimal prostate cancer"? Isr Med Assoc J. 2013 Jul; 15(7):359-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  4. Functional outcomes in African-Americans after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2012 Aug; 26(8):1013-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  5. Short (= 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  6. Impact of prostate weight on probability of positive surgical margins in patients with low-risk prostate cancer after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2011 Mar; 77(3):677-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  7. Paediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy (RALIMA): feasibility of and initial experience with the University of Chicago technique. BJU Int. 2011 Mar; 107(6):962-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  8. Robot-assisted laparoscopic intracorporeal hand-sewn bowel anastomosis during pediatric bladder reconstructive surgery. J Endourol. 2010 Aug; 24(8):1325-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  9. Robotic radical prostatectomy for elderly patients: probability of achieving continence and potency 1 year after surgery. J Urol. 2010 May; 183(5):1803-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  10. Impact of posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: retrospective analysis of time to continence. J Endourol. 2009 Dec; 23(12):1995-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  11. Continued improvement of perioperative, pathological and continence outcomes during 700 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies. Can J Urol. 2009 Aug; 16(4):4742-9; discussion 4749.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  12. Trifecta outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology. 2009 Sep; 74(3):619-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  13. Pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Assessing nodal yield, perioperative outcomes, and complications. Urology. 2009 Aug; 74(2):296-302.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  14. Is seminal vesiculectomy necessary in all patients with biopsy Gleason score 6? J Endourol. 2009 Apr; 23(4):709-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  15. The dimensions and symmetry of the seminal vesicles. J Robot Surg. 2009 Mar; 3(1):29-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  16. Serum creatinine can be used as a surrogate for glomerular filtration rate in single renal unit models. Can J Urol. 2009 Feb; 16(1):4452-7; discussion 4457.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  17. Planned nerve preservation to reduce positive surgical margins during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2008 Jun; 22(6):1303-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  18. Long-term functional and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing sural nerve interposition grafting during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2008 May; 22(5):1005-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  19. Surgeons' perceptions and injuries during and after urologic laparoscopic surgery. Urology. 2008 Mar; 71(3):404-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  20. Urinary and sexual function outcomes among different age groups after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2008 Mar; 22(3):519-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  21. Use of the Endoholder device during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the "poor man's" fourth arm equivalent. J Endourol. 2008 Feb; 22(2):385-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  22. Sural nerve grafting in robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: interim report. J Endourol. 2007 Dec; 21(12):1547-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  23. The Will Rogers phenomenon in urological oncology. J Urol. 2008 Jan; 179(1):28-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  24. Da Vinci robot error and failure rates: single institution experience on a single three-arm robot unit of more than 700 consecutive robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. J Endourol. 2007 Nov; 21(11):1341-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  25. Predicting the risk of patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 to harbor a higher grade cancer. J Urol. 2007 Nov; 178(5):1925-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  26. Early laparoscopic management of acute postoperative hemorrhage after initial laparoscopic surgery. J Endourol. 2007 Aug; 21(8):872-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  27. Robotic radical prostatectomy learning curve of a fellowship-trained laparoscopic surgeon. J Endourol. 2007 Apr; 21(4):441-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  28. Focus on details. Eliminating knot-tying during the vesico-urethral anastomosis in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2007 Feb; 99(2):483-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  29. Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology. 2007 Feb; 69(2):300-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  30. Age-stratified outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg. 2007; 1(2):125-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  31. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 100 patients with one year of follow-up. Urology. 2006 Dec; 68(6):1275-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  32. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur Urol. 2007 Mar; 51(3):755-62; discussion 763.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  33. Minimizing knot tying during reconstructive laparoscopic urology. Urology. 2006 Sep; 68(3):508-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  34. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients. Urology. 2006 Apr; 67(4):774-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  35. Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation. Urology. 2005 Aug; 66(2):419-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  36. Setting up a pediatric robotic urology program: A USA institution experience. Int J Urol. 2018 02; 25(2):86-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  37. Extraprostatic Extension Is Extremely Rare for Contemporary Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2017 09; 72(3):455-460.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  38. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 10; 40(10):1400-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  39. Positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. J Urol. 2011 Aug; 186(2):511-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  40. Continence outcomes in patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy. J Urol. 2011 Apr; 185(4):1438-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  41. Robotic radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk disease: a review of short-term outcomes from a high-volume center. J Endourol. 2011 Mar; 25(3):455-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  42. Gleason 6 prostate cancer in one or two biopsy cores can harbor more aggressive disease. J Endourol. 2011 Apr; 25(4):699-703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  43. Intraoperative frozen section assessment of pelvic lymph nodes during radical prostatectomy is of limited value. BJU Int. 2010 Nov; 106(10):1463-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  44. Evolution of open radical retropubic prostatectomy--how have open surgeons responded to the challenge of minimally invasive surgery? J Endourol. 2009 Nov; 23(11):1893-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  45. Analysis of continence rates following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: strict leak-free and pad-free continence. Urology. 2010 Feb; 75(2):431-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  46. Total laparorobotic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with sac exclusion obliteration and aortobifemoral bypass. Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 Sep-Oct; 23(5):686.e11-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  47. Extrafascial versus interfascial nerve-sparing technique for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparison of functional outcomes and positive surgical margins characteristics. Urology. 2009 Sep; 74(3):611-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  48. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence. J Urol. 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  49. Wolffian duct derivative anomalies: technical considerations when encountered during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Can J Urol. 2009 Apr; 16(2):4601-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  50. Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes. Urology. 2009 Feb; 73(2):316-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  51. A single microfocus (5% or less) of Gleason 6 prostate cancer at biopsy--can we predict adverse pathological outcomes? J Urol. 2008 Dec; 180(6):2436-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  52. Multi-institutional external validation of seminal vesicle invasion nomograms: head-to-head comparison of Gallina nomogram versus 2007 Partin tables. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Apr 01; 73(5):1461-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  53. Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for biopsy Gleason 8 to 10: prediction of favorable pathologic outcome with preoperative parameters. J Endourol. 2008 Jul; 22(7):1477-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  54. Urinary and sexual quality of life 1 year following robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008 Aug; 180(2):663-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  55. Adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node positive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. 2009 Mar-Apr; 27(2):160-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  56. The predictive value of multi-targeted fluorescent in-situ hybridization in patients with history of bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. 2008 May-Jun; 26(3):246-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  57. Bladder neck contracture after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: evaluation of incidence and risk factors and impact on urinary function. J Endourol. 2008 Feb; 22(2):377-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  58. Bladder neck contracture after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: evaluation of incidence and risk factors and impact on urinary function. J Endourol. 2008 Jan; 22(1):97-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  59. External validation of a nomogram for prediction of side-specific extracapsular extension at robotic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2007 Nov; 21(11):1345-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  60. Prostate weight: an independent predictor for positive surgical margins during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Can J Urol. 2007 Oct; 14(5):3697-701.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  61. Impact of surgical margin status on long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2006 Dec; 98(6):1199-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.