The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

David Freedman to Photic Stimulation

This is a "connection" page, showing publications David Freedman has written about Photic Stimulation.
Connection Strength

2.586
  1. High-performance execution of psychophysical tasks with complex visual stimuli in MATLAB. J Neurophysiol. 2013 Jan; 109(1):249-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.369
  2. Posterior Parietal Cortex Plays a Causal Role in Abstract Memory-Based Visual Categorical Decisions. J Neurosci. 2023 06 07; 43(23):4315-4328.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  3. Low-dimensional encoding of decisions in parietal cortex reflects long-term training history. Nat Commun. 2023 02 23; 14(1):1010.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.190
  4. Abstract Encoding of Categorical Decisions in Medial Superior Temporal and Lateral Intraparietal Cortices. J Neurosci. 2022 11 30; 42(48):9069-9081.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  5. Interaction between neuronal encoding and population dynamics during categorization task switching in parietal cortex. Neuron. 2021 02 17; 109(4):700-712.e4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  6. Mice Preferentially Use Increases in Cerebral Cortex Spiking to Detect Changes in Visual Stimuli. J Neurosci. 2020 10 07; 40(41):7902-7920.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  7. Interaction between Spatial and Feature Attention in Posterior Parietal Cortex. Neuron. 2016 Aug 17; 91(4):931-943.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  8. Neuronal Mechanisms of Visual Categorization: An Abstract View on Decision Making. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2016 07 08; 39:129-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  9. Task dependence of visual and category representations in prefrontal and inferior temporal cortices. J Neurosci. 2014 Nov 26; 34(48):16065-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  10. A hierarchy of intrinsic timescales across primate cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2014 Dec; 17(12):1661-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  11. Dynamic integration of task-relevant visual features in posterior parietal cortex. Neuron. 2014 Sep 17; 83(6):1468-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  12. A comparison of lateral and medial intraparietal areas during a visual categorization task. J Neurosci. 2013 Aug 07; 33(32):13157-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  13. Independent category and spatial encoding in parietal cortex. Neuron. 2013 Mar 06; 77(5):969-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  14. Biased associative representations in parietal cortex. Neuron. 2013 Jan 09; 77(1):180-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  15. Preferential encoding of visual categories in parietal cortex compared with prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2012 Jan 15; 15(2):315-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  16. Distinct encoding of spatial and nonspatial visual information in parietal cortex. J Neurosci. 2009 Apr 29; 29(17):5671-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  17. Neural mechanisms of visual categorization: insights from neurophysiology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008; 32(2):311-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  18. Experience-dependent representation of visual categories in parietal cortex. Nature. 2006 Sep 07; 443(7107):85-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  19. Experience-dependent sharpening of visual shape selectivity in inferior temporal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2006 Nov; 16(11):1631-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  20. Posterior parietal cortex: Space--and beyond. Neuron. 2004 Jun 24; 42(6):881-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  21. A comparison of primate prefrontal and inferior temporal cortices during visual categorization. J Neurosci. 2003 Jun 15; 23(12):5235-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  22. Generalized associative representations in parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2011 Jul 17; 14(8):1075-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  23. Dynamic population coding of category information in inferior temporal and prefrontal cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2008 Sep; 100(3):1407-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.