Maryellen L. Giger to Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Maryellen L. Giger has written about Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted.
Connection Strength
4.543
-
A deep learning methodology for improved breast cancer diagnosis using multiparametric MRI. Sci Rep. 2020 06 29; 10(1):10536.
Score: 0.610
-
A deep feature fusion methodology for breast cancer diagnosis demonstrated on three imaging modality datasets. Med Phys. 2017 Oct; 44(10):5162-5171.
Score: 0.499
-
Computerized detection of breast cancer on automated breast ultrasound imaging of women with dense breasts. Med Phys. 2014 Jan; 41(1):012901.
Score: 0.389
-
Update on the potential of computer-aided diagnosis for breast cancer. Future Oncol. 2010 Jan; 6(1):1-4.
Score: 0.295
-
Automated method for improving system performance of computer-aided diagnosis in breast ultrasound. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009 Jan; 28(1):122-8.
Score: 0.275
-
Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM. Med Phys. 2008 Dec; 35(12):5799-820.
Score: 0.273
-
Breast US computer-aided diagnosis workstation: performance with a large clinical diagnostic population. Radiology. 2008 Aug; 248(2):392-7.
Score: 0.265
-
Feature selection with limited datasets. Med Phys. 1999 Oct; 26(10):2176-82.
Score: 0.145
-
Development of an improved CAD scheme for automated detection of lung nodules in digital chest images. Med Phys. 1997 Sep; 24(9):1395-403.
Score: 0.125
-
Computer-aided methods help cancer diagnoses. Diagn Imaging (San Franc). 1996 Nov; Suppl Digital X:D17-20.
Score: 0.118
-
Image processing and computer-aided diagnosis. Radiol Clin North Am. 1996 May; 34(3):565-96.
Score: 0.114
-
Potential of computer-aided diagnosis of high spectral and spatial resolution (HiSS) MRI in the classification of breast lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Jan; 39(1):59-67.
Score: 0.095
-
Quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images: differentiation between prostate cancer and normal tissue and correlation with Gleason score--a computer-aided diagnosis development study. Radiology. 2013 Jun; 267(3):787-96.
Score: 0.091
-
A scaling transformation for classifier output based on likelihood ratio: applications to a CAD workstation for diagnosis of breast cancer. Med Phys. 2012 May; 39(5):2787-804.
Score: 0.087
-
Evaluation of clinical breast MR imaging performed with prototype computer-aided diagnosis breast MR imaging workstation: reader study. Radiology. 2011 Mar; 258(3):696-704.
Score: 0.079
-
Cancerous breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: computerized characterization for image-based prognostic markers. Radiology. 2010 Mar; 254(3):680-90.
Score: 0.074
-
Breast US computer-aided diagnosis system: robustness across urban populations in South Korea and the United States. Radiology. 2009 Dec; 253(3):661-71.
Score: 0.073
-
Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis on a large clinical full-field digital mammographic dataset. Acad Radiol. 2008 Nov; 15(11):1437-45.
Score: 0.068
-
Prevalence scaling: applications to an intelligent workstation for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Acad Radiol. 2008 Nov; 15(11):1446-57.
Score: 0.068
-
Potential effect of different radiologist reporting methods on studies showing benefit of CAD. Acad Radiol. 2008 Feb; 15(2):139-52.
Score: 0.065
-
Classification of breast lesions with multimodality computer-aided diagnosis: observer study results on an independent clinical data set. Radiology. 2006 Aug; 240(2):357-68.
Score: 0.058
-
Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images. Med Phys. 2006 Feb; 33(2):482-91.
Score: 0.056
-
Robustness of computerized lesion detection and classification scheme across different breast US platforms. Radiology. 2005 Dec; 237(3):834-40.
Score: 0.056
-
Computerized detection of mass lesions in digital breast tomosynthesis images using two- and three dimensional radial gradient index segmentation. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2004 Oct; 3(5):437-41.
Score: 0.051
-
Computerized detection and classification of cancer on breast ultrasound. Acad Radiol. 2004 May; 11(5):526-35.
Score: 0.050
-
Lung cancer: performance of automated lung nodule detection applied to cancers missed in a CT screening program. Radiology. 2002 Dec; 225(3):685-92.
Score: 0.045
-
Computerized diagnosis of breast lesions on ultrasound. Med Phys. 2002 Feb; 29(2):157-64.
Score: 0.043
-
Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000 Jul; 38(4):725-40.
Score: 0.038
-
Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol. 1999 Jan; 6(1):22-33.
Score: 0.034
-
Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging. Med Phys. 1998 Sep; 25(9):1647-54.
Score: 0.034
-
Potential usefulness of digital imaging in clinical diagnostic radiology: computer-aided diagnosis. J Digit Imaging. 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):2-7.
Score: 0.026
-
Automated segmentation of digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol. 1995 Jan; 2(1):1-9.
Score: 0.026
-
Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms using a shift-invariant artificial neural network. Med Phys. 1994 Apr; 21(4):517-24.
Score: 0.025
-
Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. Med Phys. 1994 Feb; 21(2):265-9.
Score: 0.024
-
Digital radiography. A useful clinical tool for computer-aided diagnosis by quantitative analysis of radiographic images. Acta Radiol. 1993 Sep; 34(5):426-39.
Score: 0.024
-
Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms: applications of artificial neural networks. Med Phys. 1992 May-Jun; 19(3):555-60.
Score: 0.022
-
Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images. Med Phys. 1991 Sep-Oct; 18(5):955-63.
Score: 0.021
-
Correlative feature analysis on FFDM. Med Phys. 2008 Dec; 35(12):5490-500.
Score: 0.017
-
A dual-stage method for lesion segmentation on digital mammograms. Med Phys. 2007 Nov; 34(11):4180-93.
Score: 0.016
-
Ideal observer approximation using Bayesian classification neural networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Sep; 20(9):886-99.
Score: 0.010
-
Automatic segmentation of breast lesions on ultrasound. Med Phys. 2001 Aug; 28(8):1652-9.
Score: 0.010
-
Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules on CT scans. Radiographics. 1999 Sep-Oct; 19(5):1303-11.
Score: 0.009
-
Computerized analysis of abnormal asymmetry in digital chest radiographs: evaluation of potential utility. J Digit Imaging. 1999 Feb; 12(1):34-42.
Score: 0.009
-
Computerized delineation and analysis of costophrenic angles in digital chest radiographs. Acad Radiol. 1998 May; 5(5):329-35.
Score: 0.008
-
Reduction of false positives in computerized detection of lung nodules in chest radiographs using artificial neural networks, discriminant analysis, and a rule-based scheme. J Digit Imaging. 1994 Nov; 7(4):196-207.
Score: 0.006
-
Multifractal radiographic analysis of osteoporosis. Med Phys. 1994 Apr; 21(4):503-8.
Score: 0.006
-
Computerized radiographic analysis of osteoporosis: preliminary evaluation. Radiology. 1993 Feb; 186(2):471-4.
Score: 0.006
-
Potential usefulness of an artificial neural network for differential diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases: pilot study. Radiology. 1990 Dec; 177(3):857-60.
Score: 0.005