The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Maryellen Giger to Female

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Maryellen Giger has written about Female.
Connection Strength

1.108
  1. Multi-institutional development and testing of attention-enhanced deep learning segmentation of thyroid nodules on ultrasound. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2025 Feb; 20(2):259-267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  2. Role of sureness in evaluating AI/CADx: Lesion-based repeatability of machine learning classification performance on breast MRI. Med Phys. 2024 Mar; 51(3):1812-1821.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  3. Past, Present, and Future of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Screening. J Breast Imaging. 2022 Oct 10; 4(5):451-459.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  4. Machine Learning for Early Detection of Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury After Cardiac Arrest. Neurocrit Care. 2022 06; 36(3):974-982.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  5. Clinical Artificial Intelligence Applications: Breast Imaging. Radiol Clin North Am. 2021 Nov; 59(6):1027-1043.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  6. Robustness of radiomic features of benign breast lesions and hormone receptor positive/HER2-negative cancers across DCE-MR magnet strengths. Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 10; 82:111-121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  7. A deep learning methodology for improved breast cancer diagnosis using multiparametric MRI. Sci Rep. 2020 06 29; 10(1):10536.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  8. Independent validation of machine learning in diagnosing breast Cancer on magnetic resonance imaging within a single institution. Cancer Imaging. 2019 Sep 18; 19(1):64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  9. Radiomics robustness assessment and classification evaluation: A two-stage method demonstrated on multivendor FFDM. Med Phys. 2019 May; 46(5):2145-2156.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  10. Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer: Additive Value of Radiomics of Breast Parenchyma. Radiology. 2019 04; 291(1):15-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  11. Transfer Learning From Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Diagnosis: A Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography. Acad Radiol. 2019 06; 26(6):735-743.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  12. Additive Benefit of Radiomics Over Size Alone in the Distinction Between Benign Lesions and Luminal A Cancers on a Large Clinical Breast MRI Dataset. Acad Radiol. 2019 02; 26(2):202-209.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  13. Most-enhancing tumor volume by MRI radiomics predicts recurrence-free survival "early on" in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Cancer Imaging. 2018 Apr 13; 18(1):12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  14. MR Imaging Radiomics Signatures for Predicting the Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence as Given by Research Versions of MammaPrint, Oncotype DX, and PAM50 Gene Assays. Radiology. 2016 Nov; 281(2):382-391.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  15. Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Jun; 206(6):1341-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  16. Using computer-extracted image phenotypes from tumors on breast magnetic resonance imaging to predict breast cancer pathologic stage. Cancer. 2016 Mar 01; 122(5):748-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  17. Using quantitative image analysis to classify axillary lymph nodes on breast MRI: a new application for the Z 0011 Era. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Mar; 84(3):392-397.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  18. Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2 mutation status: a cross-sectional study. Breast Cancer Res. 2014; 16(4):424.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  19. Computerized detection of breast cancer on automated breast ultrasound imaging of women with dense breasts. Med Phys. 2014 Jan; 41(1):012901.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  20. Breast image analysis for risk assessment, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2013; 15:327-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  21. Interreader scoring variability in an observer study using dual-modality imaging for breast cancer detection in women with dense breasts. Acad Radiol. 2013 Jul; 20(7):847-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  22. Repeatability in computer-aided diagnosis: application to breast cancer diagnosis on sonography. Med Phys. 2010 Jun; 37(6):2659-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  23. Radiographic texture analysis of densitometric calcaneal images: relationship to clinical characteristics and to bone fragility. J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Jan; 25(1):56-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  24. Update on the potential of computer-aided diagnosis for breast cancer. Future Oncol. 2010 Jan; 6(1):1-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  25. Automated method for improving system performance of computer-aided diagnosis in breast ultrasound. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009 Jan; 28(1):122-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  26. Breast US computer-aided diagnosis workstation: performance with a large clinical diagnostic population. Radiology. 2008 Aug; 248(2):392-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  27. Reproducibility and sources of variability in radiographic texture analysis of densitometric calcaneal images. J Clin Densitom. 2008 Apr-Jun; 11(2):211-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  28. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography. Acad Radiol. 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  29. Identifying features of prior hemorrhage in cerebral cavernous malformations on quantitative susceptibility maps: a machine learning pilot study. J Neurosurg. 2025 Dec 01; 143(6):1567-1574.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  30. Hybrid artificial intelligence echogenic components-based diagnosis of adnexal masses on ultrasound. Med Phys. 2025 Jul; 52(7):e17983.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  31. Brain Imaging Features in Patients with Gunshot Wounds to the Head. J Neurotrauma. 2025 Apr; 42(7-8):689-699.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  32. Computerized analysis of images in the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2004 Oct; 25(5):411-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  33. Can AI generate diagnostic reports for radiologist approval on CXR images? A multi-reader and multi-case observer performance study. J Xray Sci Technol. 2024; 32(6):1465-1480.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  34. Patient-specific fetal radiation dosimetry for pregnant patients undergoing abdominal and pelvic CT imaging. Med Phys. 2023 Jun; 50(6):3801-3815.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  35. Differences in Molecular Subtype Reference Standards Impact AI-based Breast Cancer Classification with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI. Radiology. 2023 04; 307(1):e220984.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  36. Construction of a digital fetus library for radiation dosimetry. Med Phys. 2023 Apr; 50(4):2577-2589.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  37. Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology. Acad Radiol. 2002 Jan; 9(1):1-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  38. Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Dec; 20(12):1205-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  39. Tailoring steroids in the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia assisted by CT scans: three case reports. J Xray Sci Technol. 2020; 28(5):885-892.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  40. Computerized analysis of lesions in US images of the breast. Acad Radiol. 1999 Nov; 6(11):665-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  41. Radiogenomics of breast cancer using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and gene expression profiling. Cancer Imaging. 2019 Jul 15; 19(1):48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  42. Combined Benefit of Quantitative Three-Compartment Breast Image Analysis and Mammography Radiomics in the Classification of Breast Masses in a Clinical Data Set. Radiology. 2019 03; 290(3):621-628.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  43. Relationships Between Human-Extracted MRI Tumor Phenotypes of Breast Cancer and Clinical Prognostic Indicators Including Receptor Status and Molecular Subtype. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2019 Sep - Oct; 48(5):467-472.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  44. [Prevalence of upper abdominal complaints and their effect on the quality of life and utilization of medical resources. Swiss Primary Care Group]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1998 May 30; 128(22):874-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  45. Development of an improved CAD scheme for automated detection of lung nodules in digital chest images. Med Phys. 1997 Sep; 24(9):1395-403.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  46. Fast bilateral breast coverage with high spectral and spatial resolution (HiSS) MRI at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 11; 46(5):1341-1348.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  47. Bcl-2 as a Therapeutic Target in Human Tubulointerstitial Inflammation. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 11; 68(11):2740-2751.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  48. Computer-aided methods help cancer diagnoses. Diagn Imaging (San Franc). 1996 Nov; Suppl Digital X:D17-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  49. Clinical significance of noncalcified lung nodules in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Sep; 159(2):265-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  50. Image processing and computer-aided diagnosis. Radiol Clin North Am. 1996 May; 34(3):565-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  51. Response. Radiology. 2016 Feb; 278(2):633.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  52. Deciphering Genomic Underpinnings of Quantitative MRI-based Radiomic Phenotypes of Invasive Breast Carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 07; 5:17787.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  53. Long-term results of microcoil embolization for colonic haemorrhage: how common is rebleeding? Br J Radiol. 2015 Jul; 88(1051):20150203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  54. Radiologically Guided Placement of Mushroom-retained Gastrostomy Catheters: Long-term Outcomes of Use in 300 Patients at a Single Center. Radiology. 2015 Aug; 276(2):588-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  55. Dual-lumen chest port infection rates in patients with head and neck cancer. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015 Jun; 38(3):651-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  56. Comparison of barbed versus conventional sutures for wound closure of radiologically implanted chest ports. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Sep; 25(9):1433-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  57. Level set segmentation of breast masses in contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT and evaluation of stopping criteria. J Digit Imaging. 2014 Apr; 27(2):237-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  58. Computerized characterization of mammographic masses: analysis of spiculation. Cancer Lett. 1994 Mar 15; 77(2-3):201-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  59. Computer vision and artificial intelligence in mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Mar; 162(3):699-708.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  60. Mammographic quantitative image analysis and biologic image composition for breast lesion characterization and classification. Med Phys. 2014 Mar; 41(3):031915.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  61. Pilot study demonstrating potential association between breast cancer image-based risk phenotypes and genomic biomarkers. Med Phys. 2014 Mar; 41(3):031917.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  62. Potential of computer-aided diagnosis of high spectral and spatial resolution (HiSS) MRI in the classification of breast lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Jan; 39(1):59-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  63. Computers aid diagnosis of breast abnormalities. Diagn Imaging (San Franc). 1993 Jun; 15(6):98-102, 113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  64. Quantitative ultrasound image analysis of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2013 Nov; 8(6):895-903.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  65. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns on a large clinical dataset of full-field digital mammograms: robustness study with two high-risk datasets. J Digit Imaging. 2012 Oct; 25(5):591-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  66. Automated detection of mass lesions in dedicated breast CT: a preliminary study. Med Phys. 2012 Feb; 39(2):866-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  67. Re: effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Jan 04; 104(1):77; author reply 78-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  68. Computerized three-class classification of MRI-based prognostic markers for breast cancer. Phys Med Biol. 2011 Sep 21; 56(18):5995-6008.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  69. Combined use of T2-weighted MRI and T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the automated analysis of breast lesions. Magn Reson Med. 2011 Aug; 66(2):555-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  70. Normal parenchymal enhancement patterns in women undergoing MR screening of the breast. Eur Radiol. 2011 Jul; 21(7):1374-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  71. Evaluation of clinical breast MR imaging performed with prototype computer-aided diagnosis breast MR imaging workstation: reader study. Radiology. 2011 Mar; 258(3):696-704.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  72. Multimodality computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis with FFDM and DCE-MRI. Acad Radiol. 2010 Sep; 17(9):1158-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  73. Enhancement of breast CADx with unlabeled data. Med Phys. 2010 Aug; 37(8):4155-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  74. Computerized assessment of breast lesion malignancy using DCE-MRI robustness study on two independent clinical datasets from two manufacturers. Acad Radiol. 2010 Jul; 17(7):822-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  75. Cancerous breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: computerized characterization for image-based prognostic markers. Radiology. 2010 Mar; 254(3):680-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  76. Pulmonary nodules: computer-aided detection in digital chest images. Radiographics. 1990 Jan; 10(1):41-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  77. Exploring nonlinear feature space dimension reduction and data representation in breast Cadx with Laplacian eigenmaps and t-SNE. Med Phys. 2010 Jan; 37(1):339-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  78. Breast US computer-aided diagnosis system: robustness across urban populations in South Korea and the United States. Radiology. 2009 Dec; 253(3):661-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  79. A novel hybrid linear/nonlinear classifier for two-class classification: theory, algorithm, and applications. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Feb; 29(2):428-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  80. Correlative feature analysis on FFDM. Med Phys. 2008 Dec; 35(12):5490-500.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  81. Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis on a large clinical full-field digital mammographic dataset. Acad Radiol. 2008 Nov; 15(11):1437-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  82. Prevalence scaling: applications to an intelligent workstation for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Acad Radiol. 2008 Nov; 15(11):1446-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  83. Performance of breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis: dependence on image selection. Acad Radiol. 2008 Oct; 15(10):1234-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  84. DCEMRI of breast lesions: is kinetic analysis equally effective for both mass and nonmass-like enhancement? Med Phys. 2008 Jul; 35(7):3102-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  85. Radiographic texture analysis in the characterization of trabecular patterns in periprosthetic osteolysis. Acad Radiol. 2008 Feb; 15(2):176-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  86. Power spectral analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment. J Digit Imaging. 2008 Jun; 21(2):145-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  87. A dual-stage method for lesion segmentation on digital mammograms. Med Phys. 2007 Nov; 34(11):4180-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  88. Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med. 2007 Sep; 58(3):562-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  89. Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment. Acad Radiol. 2007 May; 14(5):513-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  90. Classification of breast lesions with multimodality computer-aided diagnosis: observer study results on an independent clinical data set. Radiology. 2006 Aug; 240(2):357-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  91. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. Med Phys. 2006 Aug; 33(8):2878-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  92. Radiographic texture analysis of densitometer-generated calcaneus images differentiates postmenopausal women with and without fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006 Oct; 17(10):1472-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  93. Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images. Med Phys. 2006 Feb; 33(2):482-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  94. A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images. Acad Radiol. 2006 Jan; 13(1):63-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  95. Robustness of computerized lesion detection and classification scheme across different breast US platforms. Radiology. 2005 Dec; 237(3):834-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  96. Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol. 2005 Jul; 12(7):863-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  97. Computerized detection of mass lesions in digital breast tomosynthesis images using two- and three dimensional radial gradient index segmentation. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2004 Oct; 3(5):437-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  98. Computerized detection and classification of cancer on breast ultrasound. Acad Radiol. 2004 May; 11(5):526-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  99. Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics. Med Phys. 2004 May; 31(5):1076-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  100. Comparison of radiographic texture analysis from computed radiography and bone densitometry systems. Med Phys. 2004 Apr; 31(4):882-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  101. Performance of computer-aided diagnosis in the interpretation of lesions on breast sonography. Acad Radiol. 2004 Mar; 11(3):272-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  102. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location. Med Phys. 2004 Mar; 31(3):549-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  103. Estimating three-class ideal observer decision variables for computerized detection and classification of mammographic mass lesions. Med Phys. 2004 Jan; 31(1):81-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  104. Computerized analysis of shadowing on breast ultrasound for improved lesion detection. Med Phys. 2003 Jul; 30(7):1833-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  105. Lung cancer: performance of automated lung nodule detection applied to cancers missed in a CT screening program. Radiology. 2002 Dec; 225(3):685-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  106. Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. Radiology. 2002 Nov; 225(2):519-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  107. Breast cancer: effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis observer study with independent database of mammograms. Radiology. 2002 Aug; 224(2):560-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  108. Computerized lesion detection on breast ultrasound. Med Phys. 2002 Jul; 29(7):1438-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  109. Computerized diagnosis of breast lesions on ultrasound. Med Phys. 2002 Feb; 29(2):157-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  110. Automated detection of lung nodules in CT scans: preliminary results. Med Phys. 2001 Aug; 28(8):1552-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  111. Computerized classification of benign and malignant masses on digitized mammograms: a study of robustness. Acad Radiol. 2000 Dec; 7(12):1077-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  112. Automated registration of frontal and lateral radionuclide lung scans with digital chest radiographs. Acad Radiol. 2000 Jul; 7(7):530-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  113. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000 Jul; 38(4):725-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  114. Normalized BMD as a predictor of bone strength. Acad Radiol. 2000 Jan; 7(1):33-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  115. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection. Med Phys. 2000 Jan; 27(1):4-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  116. Effect of dominant features on neural network performance in the classification of mammographic lesions. Phys Med Biol. 1999 Oct; 44(10):2579-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  117. Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol. 1999 Jan; 6(1):22-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  118. Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging. Med Phys. 1998 Sep; 25(9):1647-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  119. Automated computerized classification of malignant and benign masses on digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol. 1998 Mar; 5(3):155-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  120. Automated registration of ventilation-perfusion images with digital chest radiographs. Acad Radiol. 1997 Mar; 4(3):183-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  121. An improved computer-assisted diagnostic scheme using wavelet transform for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Acad Radiol. 1996 Aug; 3(8):621-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  122. An improved shift-invariant artificial neural network for computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Med Phys. 1996 Apr; 23(4):595-601.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  123. Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification. Radiology. 1996 Mar; 198(3):671-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  124. Analysis of spiculation in the computerized classification of mammographic masses. Med Phys. 1995 Oct; 22(10):1569-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  125. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications on digital mammograms. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1995 Mar; 33(2):174-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  126. Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications: evaluation of performance on mammograms from multiple centers. Radiographics. 1995 Mar; 15(2):443-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  127. Automated segmentation of digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol. 1995 Jan; 2(1):1-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  128. Multifractal radiographic analysis of osteoporosis. Med Phys. 1994 Apr; 21(4):503-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  129. Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms using a shift-invariant artificial neural network. Med Phys. 1994 Apr; 21(4):517-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  130. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: automated alignment of breast images and its effect on bilateral-subtraction technique. Med Phys. 1994 Mar; 21(3):445-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  131. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: investigation of feature-analysis techniques. J Digit Imaging. 1994 Feb; 7(1):18-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  132. Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. Med Phys. 1994 Feb; 21(2):265-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  133. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications: an improved method for grouping detected signals. Med Phys. 1993 Nov-Dec; 20(6):1661-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  134. Digital radiography. A useful clinical tool for computer-aided diagnosis by quantitative analysis of radiographic images. Acta Radiol. 1993 Sep; 34(5):426-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  135. Comparison of bilateral-subtraction and single-image processing techniques in the computerized detection of mammographic masses. Invest Radiol. 1993 Jun; 28(6):473-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  136. Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology. 1993 Apr; 187(1):81-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  137. Computerized radiographic analysis of osteoporosis: preliminary evaluation. Radiology. 1993 Feb; 186(2):471-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  138. Application of the EM algorithm to radiographic images. Med Phys. 1992 Sep-Oct; 19(5):1175-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  139. Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms: applications of artificial neural networks. Med Phys. 1992 May-Jun; 19(3):555-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  140. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images. Med Phys. 1991 Sep-Oct; 18(5):955-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  141. Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiology. J Thorac Imaging. 1990 Jan; 5(1):67-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.