The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Maryellen L. Giger to Radiographic Image Enhancement

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Maryellen L. Giger has written about Radiographic Image Enhancement.
  1. Radiomics robustness assessment and classification evaluation: A two-stage method demonstrated on multivendor FFDM. Med Phys. 2019 May; 46(5):2145-2156.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.571
  2. Region-of-interest reconstruction of motion-contaminated data using a weighted backprojection filtration algorithm. Med Phys. 2006 May; 33(5):1222-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  3. Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998 Aug; 17(4):510-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  4. Development of an improved CAD scheme for automated detection of lung nodules in digital chest images. Med Phys. 1997 Sep; 24(9):1395-403.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  5. Detection of lung nodules in digital chest radiographs using artificial neural networks: a pilot study. J Digit Imaging. 1995 May; 8(2):88-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  6. Digital image subtraction of temporally sequential chest images for detection of interval change. Med Phys. 1994 Mar; 21(3):453-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  7. Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules in digital chest images: use of morphological filters in reducing false-positive detections. Med Phys. 1990 Sep-Oct; 17(5):861-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  8. Multimodality computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis with FFDM and DCE-MRI. Acad Radiol. 2010 Sep; 17(9):1158-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  9. Pulmonary nodules: computer-aided detection in digital chest images. Radiographics. 1990 Jan; 10(1):41-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  10. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 13. Effect of simple structured noise on the detectability of simulated stenotic lesions. Med Phys. 1989 Jan-Feb; 16(1):14-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  11. Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis on a large clinical full-field digital mammographic dataset. Acad Radiol. 2008 Nov; 15(11):1437-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  12. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. 3. Automated detection of nodules in peripheral lung fields. Med Phys. 1988 Mar-Apr; 15(2):158-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  13. A dual-stage method for lesion segmentation on digital mammograms. Med Phys. 2007 Nov; 34(11):4180-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  14. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography 10. Structure mottle of II-TV digital imaging systems. Med Phys. 1986 Nov-Dec; 13(6):843-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  15. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 9. Effect of displayed grey levels on signal detection. Med Phys. 1986 May-Jun; 13(3):312-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  16. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 7. Noise Wiener spectra of II-TV digital imaging systems. Med Phys. 1986 Mar-Apr; 13(2):131-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  17. Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images. Med Phys. 2006 Feb; 33(2):482-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  18. Investigation of physical image quality indices of a bone densitometry system. Med Phys. 2004 Apr; 31(4):873-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  19. Comparison of radiographic texture analysis from computed radiography and bone densitometry systems. Med Phys. 2004 Apr; 31(4):882-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  20. Computerized classification of benign and malignant masses on digitized mammograms: a study of robustness. Acad Radiol. 2000 Dec; 7(12):1077-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  21. Automated registration of frontal and lateral radionuclide lung scans with digital chest radiographs. Acad Radiol. 2000 Jul; 7(7):530-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  22. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection. Med Phys. 2000 Jan; 27(1):4-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  23. Computerized analysis of radiographic bone patterns: effect of imaging conditions on performance. Med Phys. 2000 Jan; 27(1):75-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  24. Computerized radiographic texture measures for characterizing bone strength: a simulated clinical setup using femoral neck specimens. Med Phys. 1999 Nov; 26(11):2295-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  25. Computerized analysis of abnormal asymmetry in digital chest radiographs: evaluation of potential utility. J Digit Imaging. 1999 Feb; 12(1):34-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  26. Computerized delineation and analysis of costophrenic angles in digital chest radiographs. Acad Radiol. 1998 May; 5(5):329-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  27. Automated lung segmentation in digitized posteroanterior chest radiographs. Acad Radiol. 1998 Apr; 5(4):245-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  28. Automated computerized classification of malignant and benign masses on digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol. 1998 Mar; 5(3):155-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  29. Automated registration of ventilation-perfusion images with digital chest radiographs. Acad Radiol. 1997 Mar; 4(3):183-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  30. Density correction of peripheral breast tissue on digital mammograms. Radiographics. 1996 Nov; 16(6):1403-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  31. An improved computer-assisted diagnostic scheme using wavelet transform for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Acad Radiol. 1996 Aug; 3(8):621-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  32. Image processing and computer-aided diagnosis. Radiol Clin North Am. 1996 May; 34(3):565-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  33. An improved shift-invariant artificial neural network for computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Med Phys. 1996 Apr; 23(4):595-601.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  34. Portable chest radiography techniques and teleradiology. Radiol Clin North Am. 1996 Jan; 34(1):1-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  35. Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications: evaluation of performance on mammograms from multiple centers. Radiographics. 1995 Mar; 15(2):443-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  36. Potential usefulness of digital imaging in clinical diagnostic radiology: computer-aided diagnosis. J Digit Imaging. 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):2-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  37. Reduction of false positives in computerized detection of lung nodules in chest radiographs using artificial neural networks, discriminant analysis, and a rule-based scheme. J Digit Imaging. 1994 Nov; 7(4):196-207.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  38. Computerized detection of abnormal asymmetry in digital chest radiographs. Med Phys. 1994 Nov; 21(11):1761-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  39. Development of a digital duplication system for portable chest radiographs. J Digit Imaging. 1994 Aug; 7(3):146-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  40. Computer vision and artificial intelligence in mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Mar; 162(3):699-708.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  41. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: investigation of feature-analysis techniques. J Digit Imaging. 1994 Feb; 7(1):18-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  42. Digital radiography. A useful clinical tool for computer-aided diagnosis by quantitative analysis of radiographic images. Acta Radiol. 1993 Sep; 34(5):426-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  43. Clinical experience with an advanced laser digitizer for cost-effective digital radiography. Radiographics. 1993 May; 13(3):635-45; discussion 645-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  44. An "intelligent" workstation for computer-aided diagnosis. Radiographics. 1993 May; 13(3):647-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  45. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns on a large clinical dataset of full-field digital mammograms: robustness study with two high-risk datasets. J Digit Imaging. 2012 Oct; 25(5):591-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  46. Automated detection of mass lesions in dedicated breast CT: a preliminary study. Med Phys. 2012 Feb; 39(2):866-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  47. Computerized scheme for the detection of pulmonary nodules. A nonlinear filtering technique. Invest Radiol. 1992 Feb; 27(2):124-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  48. Evaluation of imaging properties of a laser film digitizer. Phys Med Biol. 1992 Jan; 37(1):273-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  49. Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems. Med Phys. 1991 May-Jun; 18(3):414-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  50. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique. Radiographics. 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  51. Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography. Radiology. 1991 Jan; 178(1):175-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  52. Measurement of the presampling modulation transfer function of film digitizers using a curve fitting technique. Med Phys. 1990 Nov-Dec; 17(6):962-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  53. Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiology. J Thorac Imaging. 1990 Jan; 5(1):67-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  54. Digitized film radiography. Invest Radiol. 1989 Nov; 24(11):910-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  55. Digital imaging of the chest. Radiology. 1989 May; 171(2):297-307.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  56. Digital chest radiography: effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy, conventional video, and reversed gray scale video display formats. Radiology. 1988 Sep; 168(3):669-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  57. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 12. Effect of matrix configuration on spatial resolution. Med Phys. 1988 May-Jun; 15(3):384-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  58. Basic imaging properties of a large image intensifier-TV digital chest radiographic system. Invest Radiol. 1987 Apr; 22(4):328-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  59. Digital radiographic imaging system with multiple-slit scanning x-ray beam: preliminary report. Radiology. 1986 Nov; 161(2):513-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  60. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 8. Detection of simulated low-contrast objects in digital subtraction angiographic images. Med Phys. 1986 May-Jun; 13(3):304-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  61. Characterization of bone quality using computer-extracted radiographic features. Med Phys. 1999 Jun; 26(6):872-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  62. Automated segmentation of digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol. 1995 Jan; 2(1):1-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  63. Multifractal radiographic analysis of osteoporosis. Med Phys. 1994 Apr; 21(4):503-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  64. Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms using a shift-invariant artificial neural network. Med Phys. 1994 Apr; 21(4):517-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  65. Comparison of bilateral-subtraction and single-image processing techniques in the computerized detection of mammographic masses. Invest Radiol. 1993 Jun; 28(6):473-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  66. Development of a high quality film duplication system using a laser digitizer: comparison with computed radiography. Med Phys. 1993 Jan-Feb; 20(1):51-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  67. Image feature analysis of false-positive diagnoses produced by automated detection of lung nodules. Invest Radiol. 1992 Aug; 27(8):587-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  68. Potential usefulness of computerized nodule detection in screening programs for lung cancer. Invest Radiol. 1992 Jun; 27(6):471-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.