The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Maryellen L. Giger to Retrospective Studies

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Maryellen L. Giger has written about Retrospective Studies.
Connection Strength

0.956
  1. Role of sureness in evaluating AI/CADx: Lesion-based repeatability of machine learning classification performance on breast MRI. Med Phys. 2024 Mar; 51(3):1812-1821.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  2. Machine Learning for Early Detection of Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury After Cardiac Arrest. Neurocrit Care. 2022 06; 36(3):974-982.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  3. Robustness of radiomic features of benign breast lesions and hormone receptor positive/HER2-negative cancers across DCE-MR magnet strengths. Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 10; 82:111-121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  4. A deep learning methodology for improved breast cancer diagnosis using multiparametric MRI. Sci Rep. 2020 06 29; 10(1):10536.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  5. Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer: Additive Value of Radiomics of Breast Parenchyma. Radiology. 2019 04; 291(1):15-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  6. Transfer Learning From Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Diagnosis: A Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography. Acad Radiol. 2019 06; 26(6):735-743.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  7. Additive Benefit of Radiomics Over Size Alone in the Distinction Between Benign Lesions and Luminal A Cancers on a Large Clinical Breast MRI Dataset. Acad Radiol. 2019 02; 26(2):202-209.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  8. A deep feature fusion methodology for breast cancer diagnosis demonstrated on three imaging modality datasets. Med Phys. 2017 Oct; 44(10):5162-5171.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  9. MR Imaging Radiomics Signatures for Predicting the Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence as Given by Research Versions of MammaPrint, Oncotype DX, and PAM50 Gene Assays. Radiology. 2016 Nov; 281(2):382-391.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  10. Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Jun; 206(6):1341-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  11. Interreader scoring variability in an observer study using dual-modality imaging for breast cancer detection in women with dense breasts. Acad Radiol. 2013 Jul; 20(7):847-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  12. Pilot study of machine learning in the task of distinguishing high and low-grade pediatric hydronephrosis on ultrasound. Investig Clin Urol. 2023 11; 64(6):588-596.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  13. Differences in Molecular Subtype Reference Standards Impact AI-based Breast Cancer Classification with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI. Radiology. 2023 04; 307(1):e220984.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  14. Tailoring steroids in the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia assisted by CT scans: three case reports. J Xray Sci Technol. 2020; 28(5):885-892.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  15. Long-term results of microcoil embolization for colonic haemorrhage: how common is rebleeding? Br J Radiol. 2015 Jul; 88(1051):20150203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  16. Radiologically Guided Placement of Mushroom-retained Gastrostomy Catheters: Long-term Outcomes of Use in 300 Patients at a Single Center. Radiology. 2015 Aug; 276(2):588-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  17. Dual-lumen chest port infection rates in patients with head and neck cancer. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015 Jun; 38(3):651-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  18. Comparison of barbed versus conventional sutures for wound closure of radiologically implanted chest ports. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Sep; 25(9):1433-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  19. Validation of quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images for prostate cancer detection and aggressiveness assessment: a cross-imager study. Radiology. 2014 May; 271(2):461-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  20. Quantitative ultrasound image analysis of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2013 Nov; 8(6):895-903.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  21. Quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images: differentiation between prostate cancer and normal tissue and correlation with Gleason score--a computer-aided diagnosis development study. Radiology. 2013 Jun; 267(3):787-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  22. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns on a large clinical dataset of full-field digital mammograms: robustness study with two high-risk datasets. J Digit Imaging. 2012 Oct; 25(5):591-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  23. A scaling transformation for classifier output based on likelihood ratio: applications to a CAD workstation for diagnosis of breast cancer. Med Phys. 2012 May; 39(5):2787-804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  24. Normal parenchymal enhancement patterns in women undergoing MR screening of the breast. Eur Radiol. 2011 Jul; 21(7):1374-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  25. Evaluation of clinical breast MR imaging performed with prototype computer-aided diagnosis breast MR imaging workstation: reader study. Radiology. 2011 Mar; 258(3):696-704.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  26. Cancerous breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: computerized characterization for image-based prognostic markers. Radiology. 2010 Mar; 254(3):680-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  27. Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis on a large clinical full-field digital mammographic dataset. Acad Radiol. 2008 Nov; 15(11):1437-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  28. Prevalence scaling: applications to an intelligent workstation for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Acad Radiol. 2008 Nov; 15(11):1446-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  29. Power spectral analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment. J Digit Imaging. 2008 Jun; 21(2):145-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  30. Classification of breast lesions with multimodality computer-aided diagnosis: observer study results on an independent clinical data set. Radiology. 2006 Aug; 240(2):357-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  31. Robustness of computerized lesion detection and classification scheme across different breast US platforms. Radiology. 2005 Dec; 237(3):834-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  32. Performance of computer-aided diagnosis in the interpretation of lesions on breast sonography. Acad Radiol. 2004 Mar; 11(3):272-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.