Maryellen Giger to Radiography, Thoracic
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Maryellen Giger has written about Radiography, Thoracic.
Connection Strength
1.152
-
Can AI generate diagnostic reports for radiologist approval on CXR images? A multi-reader and multi-case observer performance study. J Xray Sci Technol. 2024; 32(6):1465-1480.
Score: 0.179
-
Anatomic Point-Based Lung Region with Zone Identification for Radiologist Annotation and Machine Learning for Chest Radiographs. J Digit Imaging. 2021 08; 34(4):922-931.
Score: 0.151
-
Development of an improved CAD scheme for automated detection of lung nodules in digital chest images. Med Phys. 1997 Sep; 24(9):1395-403.
Score: 0.115
-
Portable chest radiography techniques and teleradiology. Radiol Clin North Am. 1996 Jan; 34(1):1-20.
Score: 0.103
-
Detection of lung nodules in digital chest radiographs using artificial neural networks: a pilot study. J Digit Imaging. 1995 May; 8(2):88-94.
Score: 0.098
-
Digital image subtraction of temporally sequential chest images for detection of interval change. Med Phys. 1994 Mar; 21(3):453-61.
Score: 0.090
-
Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules in digital chest images: use of morphological filters in reducing false-positive detections. Med Phys. 1990 Sep-Oct; 17(5):861-5.
Score: 0.071
-
Automated detection of lung nodules in CT scans: preliminary results. Med Phys. 2001 Aug; 28(8):1552-61.
Score: 0.038
-
Automated lung segmentation in digital lateral chest radiographs. Med Phys. 1998 Aug; 25(8):1507-20.
Score: 0.031
-
Image processing and computer-aided diagnosis. Radiol Clin North Am. 1996 May; 34(3):565-96.
Score: 0.026
-
Reduction of false positives in computerized detection of lung nodules in chest radiographs using artificial neural networks, discriminant analysis, and a rule-based scheme. J Digit Imaging. 1994 Nov; 7(4):196-207.
Score: 0.024
-
Computerized detection of abnormal asymmetry in digital chest radiographs. Med Phys. 1994 Nov; 21(11):1761-8.
Score: 0.024
-
Development of a digital duplication system for portable chest radiographs. J Digit Imaging. 1994 Aug; 7(3):146-53.
Score: 0.023
-
Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiography. Preliminary experience. Invest Radiol. 1993 Nov; 28(11):987-93.
Score: 0.022
-
An "intelligent" workstation for computer-aided diagnosis. Radiographics. 1993 May; 13(3):647-56.
Score: 0.021
-
Computer-aided diagnosis: development of automated schemes for quantitative analysis of radiographic images. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1992 Apr; 13(2):140-52.
Score: 0.020
-
Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography. Radiology. 1991 Jan; 178(1):175-9.
Score: 0.018
-
Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiology. J Thorac Imaging. 1990 Jan; 5(1):67-76.
Score: 0.017
-
Digital imaging of the chest. Radiology. 1989 May; 171(2):297-307.
Score: 0.016
-
Digital chest radiography: effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy, conventional video, and reversed gray scale video display formats. Radiology. 1988 Sep; 168(3):669-73.
Score: 0.015
-
Basic imaging properties of a large image intensifier-TV digital chest radiographic system. Invest Radiol. 1987 Apr; 22(4):328-35.
Score: 0.014
-
Computerized analysis of abnormal asymmetry in digital chest radiographs: evaluation of potential utility. J Digit Imaging. 1999 Feb; 12(1):34-42.
Score: 0.008
-
Computerized delineation and analysis of costophrenic angles in digital chest radiographs. Acad Radiol. 1998 May; 5(5):329-35.
Score: 0.008
-
Potential usefulness of digital imaging in clinical diagnostic radiology: computer-aided diagnosis. J Digit Imaging. 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):2-7.
Score: 0.006
-
Clinical experience with an advanced laser digitizer for cost-effective digital radiography. Radiographics. 1993 May; 13(3):635-45; discussion 645-6.
Score: 0.005
-
Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems. Med Phys. 1991 May-Jun; 18(3):414-20.
Score: 0.005
-
Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique. Radiographics. 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68.
Score: 0.005