Maryellen Giger to Databases, Factual
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Maryellen Giger has written about Databases, Factual.
Connection Strength
0.538
-
Opportunities and challenges to utilization of quantitative imaging: Report of the AAPM practical big data workshop. Med Phys. 2018 Oct; 45(10):e820-e828.
Score: 0.421
-
Feature selection with limited datasets. Med Phys. 1999 Oct; 26(10):2176-82.
Score: 0.028
-
Pilot study demonstrating potential association between breast cancer image-based risk phenotypes and genomic biomarkers. Med Phys. 2014 Mar; 41(3):031917.
Score: 0.019
-
Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns on a large clinical dataset of full-field digital mammograms: robustness study with two high-risk datasets. J Digit Imaging. 2012 Oct; 25(5):591-8.
Score: 0.017
-
Computerized detection of mass lesions in digital breast tomosynthesis images using two- and three dimensional radial gradient index segmentation. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2004 Oct; 3(5):437-41.
Score: 0.010
-
Lung cancer: performance of automated lung nodule detection applied to cancers missed in a CT screening program. Radiology. 2002 Dec; 225(3):685-92.
Score: 0.009
-
Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Dec; 20(12):1285-92.
Score: 0.008
-
Computerized classification of benign and malignant masses on digitized mammograms: a study of robustness. Acad Radiol. 2000 Dec; 7(12):1077-84.
Score: 0.008
-
Effect of dominant features on neural network performance in the classification of mammographic lesions. Phys Med Biol. 1999 Oct; 44(10):2579-95.
Score: 0.007
-
An improved shift-invariant artificial neural network for computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Med Phys. 1996 Apr; 23(4):595-601.
Score: 0.006
-
Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms using a shift-invariant artificial neural network. Med Phys. 1994 Apr; 21(4):517-24.
Score: 0.005