The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Maryellen L. Giger and Kunio Doi.
Maryellen L. Giger
Connection Strength
1.201
Kunio Doi
  1. Effect of pixel size on detectability of low-contrast signals in digital radiography. J Opt Soc Am A. 1987 May; 4(5):966-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  2. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 9. Effect of displayed grey levels on signal detection. Med Phys. 1986 May-Jun; 13(3):312-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  3. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 3. Effect of pixel size on SNR and threshold contrast. Med Phys. 1985 Mar-Apr; 12(2):201-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  4. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. I. Modulation transfer function. Med Phys. 1984 May-Jun; 11(3):287-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  5. Lung cancer: performance of automated lung nodule detection applied to cancers missed in a CT screening program. Radiology. 2002 Dec; 225(3):685-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  6. Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol. 1999 Jan; 6(1):22-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  7. Automated computerized classification of malignant and benign masses on digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol. 1998 Mar; 5(3):155-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  8. Development of an improved CAD scheme for automated detection of lung nodules in digital chest images. Med Phys. 1997 Sep; 24(9):1395-403.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  9. Density correction of peripheral breast tissue on digital mammograms. Radiographics. 1996 Nov; 16(6):1403-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  10. Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification. Radiology. 1996 Mar; 198(3):671-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  11. Detection of lung nodules in digital chest radiographs using artificial neural networks: a pilot study. J Digit Imaging. 1995 May; 8(2):88-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  12. Potential usefulness of digital imaging in clinical diagnostic radiology: computer-aided diagnosis. J Digit Imaging. 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):2-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  13. Automated segmentation of digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol. 1995 Jan; 2(1):1-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  14. Digital image subtraction of temporally sequential chest images for detection of interval change. Med Phys. 1994 Mar; 21(3):453-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  15. Digital radiography. A useful clinical tool for computer-aided diagnosis by quantitative analysis of radiographic images. Acta Radiol. 1993 Sep; 34(5):426-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  16. An "intelligent" workstation for computer-aided diagnosis. Radiographics. 1993 May; 13(3):647-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  17. Simulation studies of data classification by artificial neural networks: potential applications in medical imaging and decision making. J Digit Imaging. 1993 May; 6(2):117-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  18. Computer-aided diagnosis: development of automated schemes for quantitative analysis of radiographic images. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1992 Apr; 13(2):140-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  19. Measurement of the presampling modulation transfer function of film digitizers using a curve fitting technique. Med Phys. 1990 Nov-Dec; 17(6):962-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  20. Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules in digital chest images: use of morphological filters in reducing false-positive detections. Med Phys. 1990 Sep-Oct; 17(5):861-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  21. Pulmonary nodules: computer-aided detection in digital chest images. Radiographics. 1990 Jan; 10(1):41-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  22. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 13. Effect of simple structured noise on the detectability of simulated stenotic lesions. Med Phys. 1989 Jan-Feb; 16(1):14-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  23. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 12. Effect of matrix configuration on spatial resolution. Med Phys. 1988 May-Jun; 15(3):384-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  24. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. 3. Automated detection of nodules in peripheral lung fields. Med Phys. 1988 Mar-Apr; 15(2):158-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  25. Digital radiographic imaging system with multiple-slit scanning x-ray beam: preliminary report. Radiology. 1986 Nov; 161(2):513-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  26. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography 10. Structure mottle of II-TV digital imaging systems. Med Phys. 1986 Nov-Dec; 13(6):843-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  27. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 7. Noise Wiener spectra of II-TV digital imaging systems. Med Phys. 1986 Mar-Apr; 13(2):131-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  28. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 6. MTFs of II-TV digital imaging systems. Med Phys. 1985 Nov-Dec; 12(6):713-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  29. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 2. Noise Wiener spectrum. Med Phys. 1984 Nov-Dec; 11(6):797-805.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  30. Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules on CT scans. Radiographics. 1999 Sep-Oct; 19(5):1303-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  31. An improved computer-assisted diagnostic scheme using wavelet transform for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Acad Radiol. 1996 Aug; 3(8):621-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  32. An improved shift-invariant artificial neural network for computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Med Phys. 1996 Apr; 23(4):595-601.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  33. Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications: evaluation of performance on mammograms from multiple centers. Radiographics. 1995 Mar; 15(2):443-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  34. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications on digital mammograms. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1995 Mar; 33(2):174-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  35. Reduction of false positives in computerized detection of lung nodules in chest radiographs using artificial neural networks, discriminant analysis, and a rule-based scheme. J Digit Imaging. 1994 Nov; 7(4):196-207.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  36. Development of a digital duplication system for portable chest radiographs. J Digit Imaging. 1994 Aug; 7(3):146-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  37. Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms using a shift-invariant artificial neural network. Med Phys. 1994 Apr; 21(4):517-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  38. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: automated alignment of breast images and its effect on bilateral-subtraction technique. Med Phys. 1994 Mar; 21(3):445-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  39. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: investigation of feature-analysis techniques. J Digit Imaging. 1994 Feb; 7(1):18-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  40. Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. Med Phys. 1994 Feb; 21(2):265-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  41. Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiography. Preliminary experience. Invest Radiol. 1993 Nov; 28(11):987-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  42. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications: an improved method for grouping detected signals. Med Phys. 1993 Nov-Dec; 20(6):1661-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  43. Comparison of bilateral-subtraction and single-image processing techniques in the computerized detection of mammographic masses. Invest Radiol. 1993 Jun; 28(6):473-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  44. Clinical experience with an advanced laser digitizer for cost-effective digital radiography. Radiographics. 1993 May; 13(3):635-45; discussion 645-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  45. Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology. 1993 Apr; 187(1):81-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  46. Computerized radiographic analysis of osteoporosis: preliminary evaluation. Radiology. 1993 Feb; 186(2):471-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  47. Development of a high quality film duplication system using a laser digitizer: comparison with computed radiography. Med Phys. 1993 Jan-Feb; 20(1):51-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  48. Image feature analysis of false-positive diagnoses produced by automated detection of lung nodules. Invest Radiol. 1992 Aug; 27(8):587-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  49. Potential usefulness of computerized nodule detection in screening programs for lung cancer. Invest Radiol. 1992 Jun; 27(6):471-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  50. Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms: applications of artificial neural networks. Med Phys. 1992 May-Jun; 19(3):555-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  51. Computerized scheme for the detection of pulmonary nodules. A nonlinear filtering technique. Invest Radiol. 1992 Feb; 27(2):124-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  52. Evaluation of imaging properties of a laser film digitizer. Phys Med Biol. 1992 Jan; 37(1):273-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  53. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images. Med Phys. 1991 Sep-Oct; 18(5):955-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  54. Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems. Med Phys. 1991 May-Jun; 18(3):414-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  55. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique. Radiographics. 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  56. Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography. Radiology. 1991 Jan; 178(1):175-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  57. Potential usefulness of an artificial neural network for differential diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases: pilot study. Radiology. 1990 Dec; 177(3):857-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  58. Evaluation of radiographs developed by a new ultrarapid film processing system. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 May; 154(5):1107-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  59. Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiology. J Thorac Imaging. 1990 Jan; 5(1):67-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  60. Digital imaging of the chest. Radiology. 1989 May; 171(2):297-307.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  61. Digital chest radiography: effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy, conventional video, and reversed gray scale video display formats. Radiology. 1988 Sep; 168(3):669-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  62. Basic imaging properties of a large image intensifier-TV digital chest radiographic system. Invest Radiol. 1987 Apr; 22(4):328-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  63. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 8. Detection of simulated low-contrast objects in digital subtraction angiographic images. Med Phys. 1986 May-Jun; 13(3):304-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  64. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 5. Characteristic curves of II-TV digital systems. Med Phys. 1986 Jan-Feb; 13(1):13-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  65. Dynamic and static phantoms for evaluation of digital subtraction angiographic systems. Radiology. 1985 Jun; 155(3):799-803.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.