The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Mark J. Ratain to Administration, Oral

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Mark J. Ratain has written about Administration, Oral.
Connection Strength

1.495
  1. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Oral Oncology Drugs: Another Example of Maslow's Hammer. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Sep; 116(3):508-510.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.208
  2. Drug-Drug Interactions With Oral Antineoplastic Agents. JAMA Oncol. 2017 06 01; 3(6):736-738.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  3. Importance of food effects for oral oncology drugs. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2012 Jun; 10(6):397-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  4. Inconsistent labeling of food effect for oral agents across therapeutic areas: differences between oncology and non-oncology products. Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Sep 01; 16(17):4446-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  5. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of sorafenib in patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction: CALGB 60301. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 10; 27(11):1800-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  6. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of erlotinib for solid tumors in patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction: CALGB 60101. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 20; 25(21):3055-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  7. The value meal: how to save $1,700 per month or more on lapatinib. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 10; 25(23):3397-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  8. Prescribing oral chemotherapy. BMJ. 2007 Feb 24; 334(7590):376.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  9. Pharmacokinetic modulation of oral etoposide by ketoconazole in patients with advanced cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2007 Nov; 60(6):811-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  10. Phase II placebo-controlled randomized discontinuation trial of sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 01; 24(16):2505-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  11. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and adherence to oral topotecan in myelodysplastic syndromes: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2006 Jan; 57(2):199-206.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  12. Phase I trial of orally administered CEP-701, a novel neurotrophin receptor-linked tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Invest New Drugs. 2005 Jan; 23(1):31-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  13. A phase I study of the oral combination of CI-994, a putative histone deacetylase inhibitor, and capecitabine. Ann Oncol. 2004 Nov; 15(11):1705-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  14. Dose-escalating study of capecitabine plus gemcitabine combination therapy in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jan 15; 20(2):582-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  15. The Right Dose: From Phase I to Clinical Practice. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2021 Mar; 41:92-106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  16. 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics: causes for variability and strategies for modulation in cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Invest. 1999; 17(7):494-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  17. Body-surface area as a basis for dosing of anticancer agents: science, myth, or habit? J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jul; 16(7):2297-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  18. Oral chemotherapy: rationale and future directions. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jul; 16(7):2557-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  19. Rationale for phase I study of UFT plus leucovorin and oral JM-216. Oncology (Williston Park). 1997 Sep; 11(9 Suppl 10):26-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  20. Phase I study of treatment with oral 13-cis-retinoic acid, subcutaneous interferon alfa-2a, cisplatin, and 24-hour infusion 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1997; 39(3):227-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  21. Five-day infusional fluorodeoxyuridine with oral leucovorin and escalating doses of interferon alpha-2b: a phase I study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1993; 32(5):347-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  22. Activity of XL184 (Cabozantinib), an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with medullary thyroid cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jul 01; 29(19):2660-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  23. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 28; 363(18):1693-703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  24. Clinical pharmacokinetics of high-dose leucovorin calcium after intravenous and oral administration. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990 Sep 05; 82(17):1411-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  25. The UGT1A1*28 polymorphism correlates with erlotinib's effect on SN-38 glucuronidation. Eur J Cancer. 2010 Jul; 46(11):2097-103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  26. Dose-ranging pharmacodynamic study of tipifarnib (R115777) in patients with relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Dec 01; 22(23):4816-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  27. Dose-ranging study of the safety and pharmacokinetics of atrasentan in patients with refractory malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Jul 01; 10(13):4406-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  28. Phase I study of an oral formulation of ZD9331 administered daily for 28 days. J Clin Oncol. 2003 May 01; 21(9):1859-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  29. A phase I study of oral uracil/ftorafur (UFT) plus leucovorin and bis-acetato-ammine-dichloro-cyclohexylamine-platinum IV (JM-216) each given over 14 days every 28 days. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1999; 43(5):385-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  30. Pharmacology of 21-day oral etoposide given in combination with i.v. cisplatin in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a cancer and leukemia group B study (CALGB 9062). Clin Cancer Res. 1997 May; 3(5):719-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  31. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oltipraz as a chemopreventive agent. Clin Cancer Res. 1995 Oct; 1(10):1133-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  32. Plasma pharmacokinetics of high-dose oral melphalan in patients treated with trialkylator chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow reinfusion. Cancer Res. 1989 Mar 01; 49(5):1318-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.