Mark J. Ratain to Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Mark J. Ratain has written about Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic.
Connection Strength
4.152
-
Reply to T.A. Yap et al. J Clin Oncol. 2016 07 10; 34(20):2432-3.
Score: 0.502
-
Casting doubt on the scientific utility of post-treatment biopsies in phase 1 trials. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2016 Feb; 14(2):78-9.
Score: 0.494
-
Analysis of Impact of Post-Treatment Biopsies in Phase I Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 01; 34(4):369-74.
Score: 0.489
-
Harmonization of Renal Function Assessment Is Needed During Early Clinical Development of Oncology Drugs. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 10; 34(2):103-4.
Score: 0.488
-
Targeted therapies: redefining the primary objective of phase I oncology trials. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep; 11(9):503-4.
Score: 0.445
-
Biomarkers in phase I oncology trials: signal, noise, or expensive distraction? Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Nov 15; 13(22 Pt 1):6545-8.
Score: 0.279
-
Do Patients With Advanced Cancer Have the Ability to Make Informed Decisions for Participation in Phase I Clinical Trials? J Clin Oncol. 2018 08 20; 36(24):2483-2491.
Score: 0.146
-
New phase I trial methodology. Semin Oncol. 1997 Apr; 24(2):253-61.
Score: 0.134
-
Taking a Measured Approach to Toxicity Data in Phase I Oncology Clinical Trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Feb 01; 22(3):527-9.
Score: 0.121
-
Prognostic factors for survival in patients treated in phase I clinical trials. Cancer. 1994 Oct 01; 74(7):1965-73.
Score: 0.112
-
Statistical and ethical issues in the design and conduct of phase I and II clinical trials of new anticancer agents. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Oct 20; 85(20):1637-43.
Score: 0.105
-
Model-guided determination of maximum tolerated dose in phase I clinical trials: evidence for increased precision. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Feb 03; 85(3):217-23.
Score: 0.100
-
Dose-escalation models for combination phase I trials in oncology. Eur J Cancer. 2010 Nov; 46(16):2870-8.
Score: 0.084
-
Complementary and alternative medicine among advanced cancer patients enrolled on phase I trials: a study of prognosis, quality of life, and preferences for decision making. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 10; 25(5):548-54.
Score: 0.066
-
Phase II oncology trials: let's be positive. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Aug 15; 11(16):5661-2.
Score: 0.060
-
Inside information: Financial conflicts of interest for research subjects in early phase clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 May 05; 96(9):656-61.
Score: 0.055
-
Estimation of the glomerular filtration rate in cancer patients: a new formula for new drugs. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 15; 21(14):2633-5.
Score: 0.052
-
Oncology phase I trial design and conduct: time for a change - MDICT Guidelines 2022. Ann Oncol. 2023 01; 34(1):48-60.
Score: 0.049
-
Endostatin: are the 2 years up yet? J Clin Oncol. 2002 Sep 15; 20(18):3758-60.
Score: 0.049
-
Rationale for phase I study of UFT plus leucovorin and oral JM-216. Oncology (Williston Park). 1997 Sep; 11(9 Suppl 10):26-9.
Score: 0.034
-
Learning from our patients: one participant's impact on clinical trial research and informed consent. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jun 01; 126(11):892-7.
Score: 0.034
-
Phase I study of suramin administered by intermittent infusion without adaptive control to cancer patients: update of two expanded dose levels near the maximally tolerated dose. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Sep; 14(9):2622-3.
Score: 0.032
-
Data modifications to phase I study of suramin. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Sep; 14(9):2623-4.
Score: 0.032
-
Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. J Clin Oncol. 1995 May; 13(5):1062-72.
Score: 0.029
-
Pushing the envelope: informed consent in phase I trials. Ann Oncol. 1995 Apr; 6(4):321-3.
Score: 0.029
-
Physician-determined patient risk of toxic effects: impact on enrollment and decision making in phase I cancer trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Nov 16; 86(22):1685-93.
Score: 0.028
-
A pharmacogenetic study of aldehyde oxidase I in patients treated with XK469. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2014 Feb; 24(2):129-32.
Score: 0.027
-
Evaluation of utility of pharmacokinetic studies in phase I trials of two oncology drugs. Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Nov 01; 19(21):6039-43.
Score: 0.026
-
Ethical issues in phase I oncology research: a comparison of investigators and institutional review board chairpersons. J Clin Oncol. 1992 Nov; 10(11):1810-6.
Score: 0.025
-
Anticancer agents targeting signaling molecules and cancer cell environment: challenges for drug development? J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Aug 04; 91(15):1281-7.
Score: 0.010
-
Study of cohort-specific consent and patient control in phase I cancer trials. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jul; 16(7):2305-12.
Score: 0.009
-
Phase I clinical and pharmacology study of 502U83 given as a 24-h continuous intravenous infusion. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1993; 31(4):283-8.
Score: 0.006