The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Mark J. Ratain to Risk Assessment

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Mark J. Ratain has written about Risk Assessment.
Mark J. Ratain
Connection Strength
0.440
Risk Assessment
  1. The Outlier in All of Us: Why Implementing Pharmacogenomics Could Matter for Everyone. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Apr; 99(4):401-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  2. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of erlotinib for solid tumors in patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction: CALGB 60101. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 20; 25(21):3055-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  3. Estimation of the glomerular filtration rate in cancer patients: a new formula for new drugs. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 15; 21(14):2633-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  4. Appraisal and development of evidence-based clinical decision support to enable perioperative pharmacogenomic application. Pharmacogenomics J. 2021 12; 21(6):691-711.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  5. Weight-Based Dosing of Pembrolizumab Every 6 Weeks in the Time of COVID-19. JAMA Oncol. 2020 11 01; 6(11):1694-1695.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  6. Genomic Analysis of Germline Variation Associated with Survival of Patients with Colorectal Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy Plus Biologics in CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance). Clin Cancer Res. 2021 01 01; 27(1):267-275.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  7. Genomewide Meta-Analysis Validates a Role for S1PR1 in Microtubule Targeting Agent-Induced Sensory Peripheral Neuropathy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 09; 108(3):625-634.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  8. Pharmacogenomic-Based Decision Support to Predict Adherence to Medications. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 08; 108(2):368-376.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  9. Quantitative analysis of ethical issues in phase I trials: a survey interview of 144 advanced cancer patients. IRB. 2000 May-Jun; 22(3):6-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  10. Drug combinations: dangerous liaisons or great expectations? Ann Oncol. 1999 Apr; 10(4):375-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  11. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for UGT1A1 and Atazanavir Prescribing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 04; 99(4):363-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  12. Pushing the envelope: informed consent in phase I trials. Ann Oncol. 1995 Apr; 6(4):321-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  13. Statistical and ethical issues in the design and conduct of phase I and II clinical trials of new anticancer agents. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Oct 20; 85(20):1637-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  14. Ethical issues in phase I oncology research: a comparison of investigators and institutional review board chairpersons. J Clin Oncol. 1992 Nov; 10(11):1810-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  15. Comprehensive pharmacogenetic analysis of irinotecan neutropenia and pharmacokinetics. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 01; 27(16):2604-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  16. Dose-ranging pharmacodynamic study of tipifarnib (R115777) in patients with relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Dec 01; 22(23):4816-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  17. Study of cohort-specific consent and patient control in phase I cancer trials. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jul; 16(7):2305-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  18. Learning from our patients: one participant's impact on clinical trial research and informed consent. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jun 01; 126(11):892-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  19. Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. J Clin Oncol. 1995 May; 13(5):1062-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.