The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Mark Ratain to Prospective Studies

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Mark Ratain has written about Prospective Studies.
Mark Ratain
Connection Strength
0.903
Prospective Studies
  1. Pharmacokinetic Simulation Analysis of Less Frequent Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab Dosing: Pharmacoeconomic Rationale for Dose Deescalation. J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 04; 62(4):532-540.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  2. The Molecular Profiling Lottery: More Accuracy, Less Precision, and No Cost. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 02 15; 25(4):1136-1138.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  3. Reply to I.F. Tannock, P. Isaacsson Velho et al, M. Tiako Meyo et al, and F.J.S.H. Woei-A-Jin et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018 10 20; 36(30):3064-3065.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  4. Low-Dose Abiraterone With Food: Rebutting an Editorial. J Clin Oncol. 2018 10 20; 36(30):3060-3061.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  5. Prospective International Randomized Phase II Study of Low-Dose Abiraterone With Food Versus Standard Dose Abiraterone In Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018 05 10; 36(14):1389-1395.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  6. Pharmacogenomics-Based Point-of-Care Clinical Decision Support Significantly Alters Drug Prescribing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Nov; 102(5):859-869.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  7. Pharmacogenomic and pharmacokinetic determinants of erlotinib toxicity. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 01; 26(7):1119-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  8. Results of the ACCOuNT Trial: A Multi-Institutional Prospective Pharmacogenomics Implementation Trial for African American Inpatients. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2026 Jan; 119(1):109-119.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  9. Care Team Attributes Predict Likelihood of Utilizing Pharmacogenomic Information During Inpatient Prescribing. Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Apr; 18(4):e70193.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  10. Prospective evaluation of body surface area as a determinant of paclitaxel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in women with solid tumors: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 9763. Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Dec 15; 10(24):8325-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  11. Anesthesia providers as stakeholders to adoption of pharmacogenomic information in perioperative care. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2022 04 01; 32(3):79-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  12. Pilot Findings of Pharmacogenomics in Perioperative Care: Initial Results From the First Phase of the ImPreSS Trial. Anesth Analg. 2022 11 01; 135(5):929-940.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  13. Patient insights on features of an effective pharmacogenomics patient portal. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2020 12; 30(9):191-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  14. Pharmacogenomic-Based Decision Support to Predict Adherence to Medications. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 08; 108(2):368-376.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  15. Clinical evaluation of germline polymorphisms associated with capecitabine toxicity in breast cancer: TBCRC-015. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jun; 181(3):623-633.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  16. Assessment of Patient Knowledge and Perceptions of Pharmacogenomics Before and After Using a Mock Results Patient Web Portal. Clin Transl Sci. 2020 01; 13(1):78-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  17. An initial genetic analysis of gemcitabine-induced high-grade neutropenia in pancreatic cancer patients in CALGB 80303 (Alliance). Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2019 08; 29(6):123-131.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  18. Analyzing the clinical actionability of germline pharmacogenomic findings in oncology. Cancer. 2018 07 15; 124(14):3052-3065.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  19. Disease-drug database for pharmacogenomic-based prescribing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 08; 100(2):179-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  20. Individualized dosing of amonafide based on a pharmacodynamic model incorporating acetylator phenotype and gender. Pharmacogenetics. 1996 Feb; 6(1):93-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  21. Vatalanib population pharmacokinetics in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: CALGB 10105 (Alliance). Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Nov; 78(5):1005-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  22. Sorafenib dose escalation is not uniformly associated with blood pressure elevations in normotensive patients with advanced malignancies. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Jul; 96(1):27-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  23. Germline variants and advanced colorectal adenomas: adenoma prevention with celecoxib trial genome-wide association study. Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Dec 01; 19(23):6430-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  24. Paradoxical relationship between acetylator phenotype and amonafide toxicity. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1991 Nov; 50(5 Pt 1):573-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  25. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging pharmacodynamic biomarker study of sorafenib in metastatic renal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Oct 01; 26(28):4572-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  26. Prospective evaluation of the relationship of patient age and paclitaxel clinical pharmacology: Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 9762). J Clin Oncol. 2006 Apr 20; 24(12):1846-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  27. Genetic variants in the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene predict the risk of severe neutropenia of irinotecan. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Apr 15; 22(8):1382-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  28. Plasma pharmacokinetics of high-dose oral melphalan in patients treated with trialkylator chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow reinfusion. Cancer Res. 1989 Mar 01; 49(5):1318-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  29. Human plasma pharmacokinetics of thiotepa following administration of high-dose thiotepa and cyclophosphamide. J Clin Oncol. 1988 Jul; 6(7):1192-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.