The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Abhinav Sidana to Middle Aged

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Abhinav Sidana has written about Middle Aged.
Connection Strength

0.556
  1. Prostate ablation for the management of localized prostate cancer. Urol Oncol. 2025 Mar; 43(3):194.e9-194.e17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  2. How does a prebiopsy mri approach for prostate cancer diagnosis affect prostatectomy upgrade rates? Urol Oncol. 2021 11; 39(11):784.e11-784.e16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  3. Racial disparity in the utilization of multiparametric MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 12; 23(4):567-572.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  4. Fusion prostate biopsy outperforms 12-core systematic prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative systematic biopsy: A multi-institutional analysis. Urol Oncol. 2018 Jul; 36(7):341.e1-341.e7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  5. Determinants and prognostic implications of malignant ascites in metastatic papillary renal cancer. Urol Oncol. 2017 03; 35(3):114.e9-114.e14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  6. Postoperative elevation in creatine kinase and its impact on renal function in patients undergoing complex partial nephrectomy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Jul; 48(7):1047-1053.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  7. Surgeons' preferences and practice patterns regarding intraoperative frozen section during partial nephrectomy. Urol Oncol. 2014 Aug; 32(6):864-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  8. Determinants of outcomes after resection of renal cell carcinoma with venous involvement. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Dec; 44(6):1671-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  9. Nephrogenic adenoma in a urethral diverticulum. Urology. 2012 Aug; 80(2):e21-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  10. Treatment decision-making for localized prostate cancer: what younger men choose and why. Prostate. 2012 Jan; 72(1):58-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  11. Quality of life and autonomy preferences in stable asthmatics: a developing country scenario. Respirology. 2009 Jan; 14(1):83-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  12. Utilization of focal therapy for patients discontinuing active surveillance of prostate cancer: Recommendations of an international Delphi consensus. Urol Oncol. 2021 11; 39(11):781.e17-781.e24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  13. Hypogonadism and prostate cancer detection on multiparametric MRI and mpMRI-TRUS fusion biopsy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2020 Apr; 52(4):633-638.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  14. Index tumor volume on MRI as a predictor of clinical and pathologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Aug; 51(8):1349-1355.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  15. Analyzing the current practice patterns and views among urologists regarding focal therapy for prostate cancer. Urol Oncol. 2019 03; 37(3):182.e1-182.e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  16. Prospective comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and qualitative in-house categorization system in detection of prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 11; 48(5):1326-1335.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  17. Risk of Upgrading from Prostate Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy Pathology-Does Saturation Biopsy of Index Lesion during Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Help? J Urol. 2018 04; 199(4):976-982.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  18. Lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy following prior radiation therapy: results from the SEER database. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Feb; 50(2):257-262.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  19. Ruling out clinically significant prostate cancer with negative multi-parametric MRI. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Jan; 50(1):7-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  20. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer. Balkan Med J. 2017 09 29; 34(5):388-396.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  21. Genitourinary paraganglioma: Demographic, pathologic, and clinical characteristics in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database (2000-2012). Urol Oncol. 2017 07; 35(7):457.e9-457.e14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  22. Repeat Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Characteristics, Complications, and Renal Functional Outcomes. J Endourol. 2016 Nov; 30(11):1219-1226.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  23. Current beliefs and practice patterns among urologists regarding prostate magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-targeted biopsy. Urol Oncol. 2017 01; 35(1):32.e1-32.e7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  24. Missing the Mark: Prostate Cancer Upgrading by Systematic Biopsy over Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy. J Urol. 2017 02; 197(2):327-334.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  25. Tumor contact with prostate capsule on magnetic resonance imaging: A potential biomarker for staging and prognosis. Urol Oncol. 2017 01; 35(1):30.e1-30.e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  26. Midline lesions of the prostate: role of MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy and implications in Gleason risk stratification. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Sep; 48(9):1445-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  27. The significance of anterior prostate lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in African-American men. Urol Oncol. 2016 06; 34(6):254.e15-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  28. Prostate Cancer Diagnosis on Repeat Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy of Benign Lesions: Recommendations for Repeat Sampling. J Urol. 2016 07; 196(1):62-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  29. Single-center comparative oncologic outcomes of surgical and percutaneous cryoablation for treatment of renal tumors. J Endourol. 2012 Nov; 26(11):1413-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  30. Large renal metastasis from rare pulmonary neoplasm. Urology. 2011 May; 77(5):1097-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.