The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Michael Vannier to Reproducibility of Results

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Vannier has written about Reproducibility of Results.
Connection Strength

0.485
  1. Analytic modeling of breast elastography. Med Phys. 2003 Sep; 30(9):2340-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  2. Blind deblurring of spiral CT images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003 Jul; 22(7):837-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  3. Validation of medical image processing in image-guided therapy. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002 Dec; 21(12):1445-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  4. Quantitative analysis of spiral computed tomography for craniofacial clinical applications. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998 Nov; 27(6):344-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  5. Low-contrast resolution in volumetric x-ray CT--analytical comparison between conventional and spiral CT. Med Phys. 1997 Mar; 24(3):373-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  6. Subtraction radiography. J Periodontol. 1996 Sep; 67(9):949-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  7. Hippocampal MR imaging morphometry by means of general pattern matching. Radiology. 1996 Jun; 199(3):787-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  8. Precision of surface measurements for below-knee residua. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 May; 77(5):477-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  9. Validation of spiral CT and optical surface scanning for lower limb stump volumetry. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1995 Aug; 19(2):97-107.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  10. Anthropometric optical surface imaging system repeatability, precision, and validation. Ann Plast Surg. 1995 Apr; 34(4):362-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  11. Bitewing-based alveolar bone densitometry: digital imaging resolution requirements. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1994 Aug; 23(3):129-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  12. Effects of region of interest outline variations on gray-scale frequency distributions for alveolar bone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993 May; 75(5):638-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  13. Alignment errors in bitewing radiographs using uncoupled positioning devices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1993 Feb; 22(1):33-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  14. Rapid PROPELLER-MRI: a combination of iterative reconstruction and under-sampling. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov; 36(5):1241-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  15. Human cortical asymmetries determined with 3D MR technology. J Neurosci Methods. 1991 Sep; 39(2):185-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  16. Brain surface cortical sulcal lengths: quantification with three-dimensional MR imaging. Radiology. 1991 Aug; 180(2):479-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  17. CT-based analysis of malignant tumor volume and localization. A preliminary study. Braz Oral Res. 2004 Oct-Dec; 18(4):338-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  18. Three-dimensional localization of cochlear implant electrodes using epipolar stereophotogrammetry. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 May; 51(5):838-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  19. 3D volume rendering using multislice CT for dental implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002 Jul; 31(4):218-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  20. The validation of 3D spiral CT-based measurements of simulated maxillofacial neoplasms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 Jun; 89(6):753-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  21. Accuracy and precision of spiral CT in the assessment of neoplastic lesions associated with the mandible. Acad Radiol. 2000 Feb; 7(2):94-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  22. Three-dimensional computed tomography landmark measurement in craniofacial surgical planning: experimental validation in vitro. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Jun; 57(6):690-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  23. Accurate linear measurements in the anterior maxilla using orthoradially reformatted spiral computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999 May; 28(3):137-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  24. Reliability of linear alveolar bone loss measurements of mandibular posterior teeth from digitized bitewing radiographs. J Clin Periodontol. 1998 Nov; 25(11 Pt 1):850-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  25. Validation of spiral computed tomography for dental implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998 Nov; 27(6):329-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  26. Comparison of reliability of manual and computer-intensive methods for radiodensity measures of alveolar bone loss. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998 Jul; 27(4):245-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  27. Spiral CT image deblurring for cochlear implantation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998 Apr; 17(2):251-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  28. Diagnostic performance of CT, MPR and 3DCT imaging in maxillofacial trauma. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1995 Sep-Oct; 19(5):385-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  29. Interactive segmentation of cerebral gray matter, white matter, and CSF: photographic and MR images. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1994 Nov-Dec; 18(6):449-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  30. Craniofacial computer-assisted surgical planning and simulation. Clin Plast Surg. 1994 Oct; 21(4):501-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  31. Determination of the position of nucleus cochlear implant electrodes in the inner ear. Am J Otol. 1994 Sep; 15(5):644-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  32. Periodontal disease morbidity quantification. I. Optimal selection of teeth for periodontal bone loss surveys. J Periodontol. 1990 Oct; 61(10):618-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  33. Periodontal disease morbidity quantification. II. Validation of alveolar bone loss measurements and vertical defect diagnosis from digital bite-wing images. J Periodontol. 1990 Oct; 61(10):623-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  34. Validation study of skull three-dimensional computerized tomography measurements. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1990 Jul; 82(3):283-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.