The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Gladell P. Paner and Scott E. Eggener.
Gladell P. Paner
Connection Strength
2.832
Scott E. Eggener
  1. The influence of the "cancer" label on perceptions and management decisions for low-grade prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 11 08; 115(11):1364-1373.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  2. Physician Perception of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Focus. 2023 11; 9(6):966-973.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  3. Renaming Grade Group 1 Prostate "Cancer" From a Pathology Perspective: A Call for Multidisciplinary Discussion. Adv Anat Pathol. 2023 Apr 17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  4. Reply to X. Farré et al. JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 Apr; 9:e2300015.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.223
  5. Reply to M. Baboudjian et al. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Mar 01; 41(7):1493-1494.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.218
  6. Blood Prostate-specific Antigen by Volume of Benign, Gleason Pattern 3 and 4 Prostate Tissue. Urology. 2022 12; 170:154-160.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.214
  7. Low-Grade Prostate Cancer: Time to Stop Calling It Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2022 09 20; 40(27):3110-3114.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.209
  8. Should Grade Group 1 (GG1) be called cancer? World J Urol. 2022 Jan; 40(1):15-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  9. Predominantly cystic clear cell renal cell carcinoma and multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential form a low-grade spectrum. Virchows Arch. 2018 Jul; 473(1):85-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  10. Prostate cancer detection following diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation. Can J Urol. 2017 Apr; 24(2):8714-8720.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  11. Influence of pathologist experience on positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. 2017 07; 35(7):461.e1-461.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  12. Extraprostatic Extension Is Extremely Rare for Contemporary Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2017 09; 72(3):455-460.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  13. Risk of lymph node metastases in pathological gleason score=6 prostate adenocarcinoma: Analysis of institutional and population-based databases. Urol Oncol. 2017 01; 35(1):31.e1-31.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  14. Clinically localized type 1 and 2 papillary renal cell carcinomas have similar survival outcomes following surgery. World J Urol. 2016 May; 34(5):687-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  15. Contemporary Population-Based Comparison of Localized Ductal Adenocarcinoma and High-Risk Acinar Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate. Urology. 2015 Oct; 86(4):777-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  16. Ex-vivo microscopic oncotesticular sperm extraction: step-by-step surgical technique at time of radical orchiectomy. Fertil Steril. 2024 Jun; 121(6):1069-1071.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  17. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 10; 40(10):1400-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.