Xiaobing Fan to Computer Simulation
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Xiaobing Fan has written about Computer Simulation.
Connection Strength
0.854
-
A simulation study comparing nine mathematical models of arterial input function for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI to the Parker model. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2018 Jun; 41(2):507-518.
Score: 0.440
-
Signal intensity form of the Tofts model for quantitative analysis of prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI data. Phys Med Biol. 2021 01 22; 66(2):025002.
Score: 0.134
-
Comparison of region-of-interest-averaged and pixel-averaged analysis of DCE-MRI data based on simulations and pre-clinical experiments. Phys Med Biol. 2017 Sep 05; 62(18):N445-N459.
Score: 0.106
-
A new approach to analysis of the impulse response function (IRF) in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCEMRI): a simulation study. Magn Reson Med. 2009 Jul; 62(1):229-39.
Score: 0.060
-
Arterial input functions (AIFs) measured directly from arteries with low and standard doses of contrast agent, and AIFs derived from reference tissues. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Feb; 34(2):197-203.
Score: 0.023
-
The effects of curved tissue layers on the power deposition patterns of therapeutic ultrasound beams. Med Phys. 1994 Jan; 21(1):25-34.
Score: 0.021
-
Empirical mathematical model for dynamic manganese-enhanced MRI of the murine pancreas for assessment of ß-cell function. Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 May; 31(4):508-14.
Score: 0.019
-
The influence of temporal resolution in determining pharmacokinetic parameters from DCE-MRI data. Magn Reson Med. 2010 Mar; 63(3):811-6.
Score: 0.016
-
Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for assessment of bowel inflammation in Crohn's disease pilot study. Acad Radiol. 2009 Oct; 16(10):1223-30.
Score: 0.015
-
Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions detected by bilateral dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a sensitivity and specificity study. Magn Reson Med. 2008 Apr; 59(4):747-54.
Score: 0.014
-
Ultrasound power deposition model for the chest wall. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999 Oct; 25(8):1275-87.
Score: 0.008