The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Xiaobing Fan to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Xiaobing Fan has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.426
  1. Population arterial input function measured from low dose breast ultrafast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and fitted with a new mathematic model. Magn Reson Imaging. 2026 07; 130:110671.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  2. Introduction to matrix-based method for analyzing hybrid multidimensional prostate MRI data. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Jan; 26(1):e14544.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  3. Effectiveness of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI with a Split Dose of Gadoterate Meglumine for Detection of Prostate Cancer. Acad Radiol. 2022 06; 29(6):796-803.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  4. Signal intensity form of the Tofts model for quantitative analysis of prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI data. Phys Med Biol. 2021 01 22; 66(2):025002.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  5. A simulation study comparing nine mathematical models of arterial input function for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI to the Parker model. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2018 Jun; 41(2):507-518.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  6. High-resolution MRI of excised human prostate specimens acquired with 9.4T in detection and identification of cancers: validation of a technique. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct; 34(4):956-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  7. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of abdominopelvic abscesses. Emerg Radiol. 2011 Dec; 18(6):515-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  8. A new approach to analysis of the impulse response function (IRF) in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCEMRI): a simulation study. Magn Reson Med. 2009 Jul; 62(1):229-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  9. Fat suppression with spectrally selective inversion vs. high spectral and spatial resolution MRI of breast lesions: qualitative and quantitative comparisons. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Dec; 24(6):1311-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  10. Diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions using an empirical mathematical model for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jun; 25(5):593-603.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  11. Automated Cluster-based Quantitative Analysis of Ultrafast DCE MRI for Differential Breast DCIS Grading. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2026 Mar; 8(2):e250432.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  12. K-means clustering-based analysis of quantitative ultrafast DCE-MRI for predicting breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2026 Jan; 27(1):e70439.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  13. Early-life gut microbiome maturity regulates blood-brain barrier and cognitive development. Gut Microbes. 2025 12; 17(1):2551879.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  14. Decoupling iterative algorithm for rapid calculation of physiological parameters from the standard Tofts model. Med Phys. 2025 Aug; 52(8):e18043.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  15. Standardization of Breast Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI Signal with Application to the Assessment of Background Parenchymal Enhancement Rate Curr Med Imaging. 2024; 20:e060323214364.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  16. A radiomics based method for prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score using enlarged region of interest. BMC Med Imaging. 2023 12 08; 23(1):205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  17. Suppression of Tumor Cell Lactate-generating Signaling Pathways Eradicates Murine PTEN/p53-deficient Aggressive-variant Prostate Cancer via Macrophage Phagocytosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2023 12 01; 29(23):4930-4940.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  18. Four-quadrant vector mapping of hybrid multidimensional MRI data for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Med Phys. 2024 Mar; 51(3):2057-2065.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  19. Bilateral asymmetry of quantitative parenchymal kinetics at ultrafast DCE-MRI predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2+ breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 12; 104:9-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  20. Parametric maps of spatial two-tissue compartment model for prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI - comparison with the standard tofts model in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023 Sep; 46(3):1215-1226.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  21. Reversal of Lactate and PD-1-mediated Macrophage Immunosuppression Controls Growth of PTEN/p53-deficient Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2023 05 15; 29(10):1952-1968.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  22. Limosilactobacillus reuteri normalizes blood-brain barrier dysfunction and neurodevelopment deficits associated with prenatal exposure to lipopolysaccharide. Gut Microbes. 2023 Jan-Dec; 15(1):2178800.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  23. Directional and inter-acquisition variability in diffusion-weighted imaging and editing for restricted diffusion. Magn Reson Med. 2022 11; 88(5):2298-2310.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  24. Physically implausible signals as a quantitative quality assessment metric in prostate diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 07; 47(7):2500-2508.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  25. Can Pre-treatment Quantitative Multi-parametric MRI Predict the Outcome of Radiotherapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer? Acad Radiol. 2022 07; 29(7):977-985.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  26. Differentiation of nonmetastatic and metastatic rodent prostate tumors with high spectral and spatial resolution MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2001 Jun; 45(6):1046-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  27. Quick evaluation of lower leg ischemia in patients with peripheral arterial disease by time maximum intensity projection CT angiography: a pilot study. BMC Med Imaging. 2021 01 06; 21(1):7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  28. Quantitative Analysis of Lower Leg Muscle Enhancement Measured From Dynamic Computed Tomographic Angiography for Diagnosis of Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2020 Jan/Feb; 44(1):20-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  29. A compact solution for estimation of physiological parameters from ultrafast prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Phys Med Biol. 2019 08 07; 64(15):155012.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  30. Revisiting quantitative multi-parametric MRI of benign prostatic hyperplasia and its differentiation from transition zone cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 06; 44(6):2233-2243.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  31. Use of Indicator Dilution Principle to Evaluate Accuracy of Arterial Input Function Measured With Low-Dose Ultrafast Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI. Tomography. 2019 06; 5(2):260-265.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  32. A two-parameter method for the estimation of ultrasound-induced temperature artifacts. Int J Hyperthermia. 1999 May-Jun; 15(3):187-202.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  33. Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer by Use of MRI-Derived Quantitative Risk Maps: A Feasibility Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 08; 213(2):W66-W75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  34. Evaluation of Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer Using High Spectral and Spatial Resolution Imaging: A Pilot Study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 05; 49(5):1374-1380.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  35. Feasibility of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Low-Dose Gadolinium: Comparative Performance With Standard Dose in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. Invest Radiol. 2018 10; 53(10):609-615.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  36. MRI Findings After MRI-Guided Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 09; 211(3):595-604.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  37. Comparison of arterial input functions measured from ultra-fast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and dynamic contrast enhanced computed tomography in prostate cancer patients. Phys Med Biol. 2018 01 30; 63(3):03NT01.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  38. Performance of Ultrafast DCE-MRI for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer. Acad Radiol. 2018 03; 25(3):349-358.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  39. A new mathematical model of wrist pulse waveforms characterizes patients with cardiovascular disease - A pilot study. Med Eng Phys. 2017 10; 48:142-149.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  40. MRI ductography of contrast agent distribution and leakage in normal mouse mammary ducts and ducts with in situ cancer. Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 07; 40:48-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  41. Ultrafast Bilateral DCE-MRI of the Breast with Conventional Fourier Sampling: Preliminary Evaluation of Semi-quantitative Analysis. Acad Radiol. 2016 09; 23(9):1137-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  42. A study of various parameters of spherically curved phased arrays for noninvasive ultrasound surgery. Phys Med Biol. 1996 Apr; 41(4):591-608.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  43. Quantitative Multiparametric MRI Features and PTEN Expression of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Mar; 206(3):559-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  44. Ultrasound surgery using multiple sonications--treatment time considerations. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996; 22(4):471-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  45. Arterial input functions (AIFs) measured directly from arteries with low and standard doses of contrast agent, and AIFs derived from reference tissues. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Feb; 34(2):197-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  46. MRI accurately identifies early murine mammary cancers and reliably differentiates between in situ and invasive cancer: correlation of MRI with histology. NMR Biomed. 2015 Sep; 28(9):1078-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  47. B1 and T1 mapping of the breast with a reference tissue method. Magn Reson Med. 2016 Apr; 75(4):1565-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  48. Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters of breast lesions at 1.5 and 3.0?T: a pilot study. Br J Radiol. 2015 May; 88(1049):20150021.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  49. Control of the necrosed tissue volume during noninvasive ultrasound surgery using a 16-element phased array. Med Phys. 1995 Mar; 22(3):297-306.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  50. The effects of curved tissue layers on the power deposition patterns of therapeutic ultrasound beams. Med Phys. 1994 Jan; 21(1):25-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  51. A preclinical evaluation of neural stem cell-based cell carrier for targeted antiglioma oncolytic virotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Jul 03; 105(13):968-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  52. Comparing post-operative human breast specimen radiograph and MRI in lesion margin and volume assessment. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012 Nov 08; 13(6):3802.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  53. Monitoring anti-angiogenic therapy in colorectal cancer murine model using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparing pixel-by-pixel with region of interest analysis. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Feb; 12(1):71-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  54. The effect of wave reflection and refraction at soft tissue interfaces during ultrasound hyperthermia treatments. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Mar; 91(3):1727-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  55. Non-contrast enhanced MRI for evaluation of breast lesions: comparison of non-contrast enhanced high spectral and spatial resolution (HiSS) images versus contrast enhanced fat-suppressed images. Acad Radiol. 2011 Dec; 18(12):1467-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  56. The diverse pathology and kinetics of mass, nonmass, and focus enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Jun; 33(6):1382-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  57. Active Crohn's disease in the small bowel: evaluation by diffusion weighted imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Mar; 33(3):615-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  58. In vivo MRI of early stage mammary cancers and the normal mouse mammary gland. NMR Biomed. 2011 Aug; 24(7):880-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  59. Characterizing early contrast uptake of ductal carcinoma in situ with high temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: a pilot study. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Oct 07; 55(19):N473-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  60. The use of a reference tissue arterial input function with low-temporal-resolution DCE-MRI data. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Aug 21; 55(16):4871-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  61. The influence of temporal resolution in determining pharmacokinetic parameters from DCE-MRI data. Magn Reson Med. 2010 Mar; 63(3):811-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  62. Relating dose of contrast media administered to uptake and washout of malignant lesions on DCEMRI of the breast. Acad Radiol. 2010 Jan; 17(1):24-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  63. Fourier component imaging of water resonance in the human breast provides markers for malignancy. Phys Med Biol. 2009 Oct 07; 54(19):5767-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  64. Kinetic curves of malignant lesions are not consistent across MRI systems: need for improved standardization of breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI acquisition. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Sep; 193(3):832-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  65. Characterization of response to radiation mediated gene therapy by means of multimodality imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2009 Aug; 62(2):348-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  66. Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for assessment of bowel inflammation in Crohn's disease pilot study. Acad Radiol. 2009 Oct; 16(10):1223-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  67. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Apr; 20(2):105-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  68. DCEMRI of breast lesions: is kinetic analysis equally effective for both mass and nonmass-like enhancement? Med Phys. 2008 Jul; 35(7):3102-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  69. Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions detected by bilateral dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a sensitivity and specificity study. Magn Reson Med. 2008 Apr; 59(4):747-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  70. Fourier components of inhomogeneously broadened water resonances in breast: a new source of MRI contrast. Magn Reson Med. 2004 Jul; 52(1):193-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  71. The effect of varying spectral resolution on the quality of high spectral and spatial resolution magnetic resonance images of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Oct; 18(4):442-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  72. Reduction of spectral ghost artifacts in high-resolution echo-planar spectroscopic imaging of water and fat resonances. Magn Reson Med. 2003 Jun; 49(6):1113-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  73. Breast MR imaging with high spectral and spatial resolutions: preliminary experience. Radiology. 2002 Aug; 224(2):577-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  74. Spectrally inhomogeneous effects of contrast agents in breast lesion detected by high spectral and spatial resolution MRI. Acad Radiol. 2002 Aug; 9 Suppl 2:S352-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  75. Ultrasound power deposition model for the chest wall. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999 Oct; 25(8):1275-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  76. An investigation of penetration depth control using parallel opposed ultrasound arrays and a scanning reflector. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Mar; 101(3):1734-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  77. A parametric study of the concentric-ring transducer design for MRI guided ultrasound surgery. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):1220-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.