Xiaobing Fan to Reproducibility of Results
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Xiaobing Fan has written about Reproducibility of Results.
Connection Strength
0.664
-
Effectiveness of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI with a Split Dose of Gadoterate Meglumine for Detection of Prostate Cancer. Acad Radiol. 2022 06; 29(6):796-803.
Score: 0.113
-
Signal intensity form of the Tofts model for quantitative analysis of prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI data. Phys Med Biol. 2021 01 22; 66(2):025002.
Score: 0.108
-
Correlation of In Vivo and Ex Vivo ADC and T2 of In Situ and Invasive Murine Mammary Cancers. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0129212.
Score: 0.074
-
A new approach to analysis of the impulse response function (IRF) in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCEMRI): a simulation study. Magn Reson Med. 2009 Jul; 62(1):229-39.
Score: 0.048
-
Fat suppression with spectrally selective inversion vs. high spectral and spatial resolution MRI of breast lesions: qualitative and quantitative comparisons. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Dec; 24(6):1311-5.
Score: 0.040
-
Multi-slice DCE-MRI data using P760 distinguishes between metastatic and non-metastatic rodent prostate tumors. MAGMA. 2006 Feb; 19(1):15-21.
Score: 0.038
-
A compact solution for estimation of physiological parameters from ultrafast prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Phys Med Biol. 2019 08 07; 64(15):155012.
Score: 0.024
-
Use of Indicator Dilution Principle to Evaluate Accuracy of Arterial Input Function Measured With Low-Dose Ultrafast Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI. Tomography. 2019 06; 5(2):260-265.
Score: 0.024
-
Ultrafast Bilateral DCE-MRI of the Breast with Conventional Fourier Sampling: Preliminary Evaluation of Semi-quantitative Analysis. Acad Radiol. 2016 09; 23(9):1137-44.
Score: 0.020
-
Arterial input functions (AIFs) measured directly from arteries with low and standard doses of contrast agent, and AIFs derived from reference tissues. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Feb; 34(2):197-203.
Score: 0.019
-
Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters of breast lesions at 1.5 and 3.0?T: a pilot study. Br J Radiol. 2015 May; 88(1049):20150021.
Score: 0.018
-
Quantitative evaluation of internal marks made using MRgFUS as seen on MRI, CT, US, and digital color images - a pilot study. Phys Med. 2014 Dec; 30(8):941-6.
Score: 0.017
-
The diverse pathology and kinetics of mass, nonmass, and focus enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Jun; 33(6):1382-9.
Score: 0.014
-
HiSStology: high spectral and spatial resolution magnetic resonance imaging detection of vasculature validated by histology and micro-computed tomography. Mol Imaging. 2011 Jun; 10(3):187-96.
Score: 0.014
-
The use of a reference tissue arterial input function with low-temporal-resolution DCE-MRI data. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Aug 21; 55(16):4871-83.
Score: 0.013
-
The influence of temporal resolution in determining pharmacokinetic parameters from DCE-MRI data. Magn Reson Med. 2010 Mar; 63(3):811-6.
Score: 0.013
-
Relating dose of contrast media administered to uptake and washout of malignant lesions on DCEMRI of the breast. Acad Radiol. 2010 Jan; 17(1):24-30.
Score: 0.013
-
Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for assessment of bowel inflammation in Crohn's disease pilot study. Acad Radiol. 2009 Oct; 16(10):1223-30.
Score: 0.012
-
Sensitivity to tumor microvasculature without contrast agents in high spectral and spatial resolution MR images. Magn Reson Med. 2009 Feb; 61(2):291-8.
Score: 0.012
-
DCEMRI of breast lesions: is kinetic analysis equally effective for both mass and nonmass-like enhancement? Med Phys. 2008 Jul; 35(7):3102-9.
Score: 0.011
-
Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions detected by bilateral dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a sensitivity and specificity study. Magn Reson Med. 2008 Apr; 59(4):747-54.
Score: 0.011
-
Comparison of high-resolution echo-planar spectroscopic imaging with conventional MR imaging of prostate tumors in mice. NMR Biomed. 2005 Aug; 18(5):285-92.
Score: 0.009