The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Peter Sand to Urethra

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Peter Sand has written about Urethra.
Connection Strength

2.598
  1. The female urethra: urethral function throughout a woman's lifetime. Int Urogynecol J. 2023 06; 34(6):1175-1186.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.836
  2. Factors influencing the long-term success of periurethral collagen therapy in the office. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Jun; 17(4):346-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.252
  3. The development of pelvic organ prolapse following isolated Burch retropubic urethropexy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003 Nov; 14(5):321-5; discussion 325.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.218
  4. Comparison of microtransducer and fiberoptic catheters for urodynamic studies. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug; 98(2):253-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  5. A prospective randomized study comparing modified Burch retropubic urethropexy and suburethral sling for treatment of genuine stress incontinence with low-pressure urethra. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jan; 182(1 Pt 1):30-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  6. Pelvic floor stimulation in the treatment of mixed incontinence complicated by a low-pressure urethra. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Nov; 88(5):757-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  7. Vesico-ureteral reflux in women with idiopathic high-pressure detrusor overactivity: prevalence, bladder function, and effect on the upper urinary tract. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Oct; 25(10):1405-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  8. The prognostic significance of augmentation of urethral closure pressure and functional length. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1990 Oct; 33(2):135-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  9. The effect of retropubic urethropexy on detrusor stability. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jun; 71(6 Pt 1):818-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  10. Hysterectomy and prior incontinence surgery as risk factors for failed retropubic cystourethropexy. J Reprod Med. 1988 Feb; 33(2):171-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  11. The low pressure urethra as a factor in failed retropubic urethropexy. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):399-402.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  12. Uninhibited urethral relaxation: an unusual cause of incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Nov; 68(5):645-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  13. Is transobturator tape as effective as tension-free vaginal tape in patients with borderline maximum urethral closure pressure? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec; 195(6):1799-804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  14. Detrusor overactivity and urge urinary incontinence [corrected] following midurethral versus bladder sling procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Dec; 193(6):2144-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  15. Pathophysiology of the overactive bladder. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar; 45(1):182-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  16. Transvaginal bladder neck suspension to Cooper's ligament. Curr Urol Rep. 2001 Oct; 2(5):344-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  17. Cystometry, urethrocystometry, and videocystourethrography. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jun; 33(2):315-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  18. Cryosurgery versus dilation and massage for the treatment of recurrent urethral syndrome. J Reprod Med. 1989 Aug; 34(8):499-504.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  19. Unsuccessful Burch retropubic urethropexy: a case-controlled urodynamic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Feb; 160(2):452-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  20. Supine urethroscopic and standing cystometry as screening methods for the detection of detrusor instability. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jul; 70(1):57-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  21. A urodynamic appraisal of success and failure after retropubic urethropexy. J Reprod Med. 1987 Sep; 32(9):693-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.