Peter Sand to Pelvic Organ Prolapse
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Peter Sand has written about Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Connection Strength
2.376
-
A Comparison of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Augmented With Polypropylene Mesh Versus Human Dermis at 12-Month Follow-up: An Ambidirectional Study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 10; 26(10):607-611.
Score: 0.651
-
Counseling in urogynecology: A difficult task, or simply good surgeon-patient communication? Int Urogynecol J. 2018 07; 29(7):943-948.
Score: 0.554
-
A review of the impact of pregnancy and childbirth on pelvic floor function as assessed by objective measurement techniques. Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar; 29(3):327-338.
Score: 0.540
-
Transvaginal Mesh Compared With Native Tissue Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2022 06 01; 139(6):975-985.
Score: 0.182
-
Anterior Colporrhaphy With and Without Dermal Allograft: A Randomized Control Trial With Long-Term Follow-Up. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 May-Jun; 25(3):206-212.
Score: 0.148
-
A new measure of sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders (PFD): the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR). Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Jul; 24(7):1091-103.
Score: 0.097
-
The PISQ-IR: considerations in scale scoring and development. Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Jul; 24(7):1105-22.
Score: 0.097
-
Transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: more FDA concerns--positive reactions are possible. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Jan; 23(1):11-3.
Score: 0.088
-
An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010; 29(1):4-20.
Score: 0.019