The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Peter Sand to Reproducibility of Results

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Peter Sand has written about Reproducibility of Results.
Connection Strength

0.269
  1. The reliability and validity of the revised Diabetes Family Conflict Scale questionnaire, in a sample of Swedish children. Acta Paediatr. 2013 Jun; 102(6):650-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  2. The reliability of the Health Related Quality Of Life questionnaire PedsQL 3.0 Diabetes Moduleā„¢ for Swedish children with type 1 diabetes. Acta Paediatr. 2012 Aug; 101(8):e344-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  3. Subjective measures of efficacy and quality of life in overactive bladder syndrome. Curr Urol Rep. 2008 Sep; 9(5):368-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  4. Comparison of microtransducer and fiberoptic catheters for urodynamic studies. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug; 98(2):253-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  5. A new measure of sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders (PFD): the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR). Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Jul; 24(7):1091-103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  6. Executive summary: The International Consultation on Incontinence 2008--Committee on: "Dynamic Testing"; for urinary incontinence and for fecal incontinence. Part 1: Innovations in urodynamic techniques and urodynamic testing for signs and symptoms of urinary incontinence in female patients. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010; 29(1):140-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  7. Executive summary: The International Consultation on Incontinence 2008--Committee on: "Dynamic Testing"; for urinary or fecal incontinence. Part 2: Urodynamic testing in male patients with symptoms of urinary incontinence, in patients with relevant neurological abnormalities, and in children and in frail elderly with symptoms of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010; 29(1):146-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.