The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

James J. Dignam to United States

This is a "connection" page, showing publications James J. Dignam has written about United States.
Connection Strength

0.286
  1. Re: Racial disparities in cancer survival among randomized clinical trials of the Southwest Oncology Group. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Feb 24; 102(4):279-80; author reply 280-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  2. Estimating breast cancer-specific and other-cause mortality in clinical trial and population-based cancer registry cohorts. Cancer. 2009 Nov 15; 115(22):5272-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  3. The role of cancer cooperative groups within the spectrum of cancer care. Cancer Control. 2004 Jan-Feb; 11(1):55-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  4. Obesity, tamoxifen use, and outcomes in women with estrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Oct 01; 95(19):1467-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  5. Differences in breast cancer prognosis among African-American and Caucasian women. CA Cancer J Clin. 2000 Jan-Feb; 50(1):50-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  6. Outcomes among African-Americans and Caucasians in colon cancer adjuvant therapy trials: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Nov 17; 91(22):1933-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  7. Association of Black Race With Prostate Cancer-Specific and Other-Cause Mortality. JAMA Oncol. 2019 07 01; 5(7):975-983.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  8. Promoting the Appropriate Use of Advanced Radiation Technologies in Oncology: Summary of a National Cancer Policy Forum Workshop. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 03 01; 97(3):450-461.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  9. Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer: heterogeneous risks by race, weight, and breast density. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Sep 18; 105(18):1365-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  10. NCI-RTOG translational program strategic guidelines for the early-stage development of radiosensitizers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Jan 02; 105(1):11-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  11. Redesigning radiotherapy quality assurance: opportunities to develop an efficient, evidence-based system to support clinical trials--report of the National Cancer Institute Work Group on Radiotherapy Quality Assurance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jul 01; 83(3):782-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  12. Outcomes among black patients with stage II and III colon cancer receiving chemotherapy: an analysis of ACCENT adjuvant trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Oct 19; 103(20):1498-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  13. Glioma-associated oncogene family zinc finger 1 expression and metastasis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiation therapy (RTOG 9003). J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 01; 29(10):1326-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  14. Conditional survival and the choice of conditioning set for patients with colon cancer: an analysis of NSABP trials C-03 through C-07. J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 20; 28(15):2544-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  15. Colorectal cancer model of health disparities: understanding mortality differences in minority populations. J Clin Oncol. 2006 May 10; 24(14):2179-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  16. Colorectal cancer and race: understanding the differences in outcomes between African Americans and whites. Med Clin North Am. 2005 Jul; 89(4):771-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  17. Mammographic density and breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Oct 06; 96(19):1467-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  18. Prognosis and treatment of patients with breast tumors of one centimeter or less and negative axillary lymph nodes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Jan 17; 93(2):112-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.