The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

James J. Dignam to Proportional Hazards Models

This is a "connection" page, showing publications James J. Dignam has written about Proportional Hazards Models.
Connection Strength

1.280
  1. The use and interpretation of competing risks regression models. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Apr 15; 18(8):2301-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.350
  2. Comments on: Yin W, Di G, Zhou L, Lu J, Liu G, Wu J, Shen K, Han Q, Shen Z, Shao Z. Time-varying pattern of recurrence risk for Chinese breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Jul; 116(1):209-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.273
  3. Joint modelling of longitudinal and multi-state processes: application to clinical progressions in prostate cancer. Stat Med. 2016 09 30; 35(22):3933-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  4. Multiple imputation methods for nonparametric inference on cumulative incidence with missing cause of failure. Stat Med. 2014 Nov 20; 33(26):4605-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  5. Conditional survival and the choice of conditioning set for patients with colon cancer: an analysis of NSABP trials C-03 through C-07. J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 20; 28(15):2544-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  6. Effects of obesity and race on prognosis in lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Jun; 97(3):245-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  7. Semiparametric models for cumulative incidence functions. Biometrics. 2004 Mar; 60(1):182-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  8. Investigating the Effect of Reirradiation or Systemic Therapy in Patients With Glioblastoma After Tumor Progression: A Secondary Analysis of NRG Oncology/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 0525. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 01 01; 100(1):38-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  9. Flexible modeling of the hazard rate and treatment effects in long-term survival studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Oct; 26(5):2455-2480.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  10. Variation over time and interdependence between disease progression and death among patients with glioblastoma on RTOG 0525. Neuro Oncol. 2015 Jul; 17(7):999-1006.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  11. Bayesian approach for flexible modeling of semicompeting risks data. Stat Med. 2014 Dec 20; 33(29):5111-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  12. A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20; 370(8):699-708.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  13. Race and the prognostic influence of p53 in women with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jul; 19(7):2334-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  14. Outcomes among black patients with stage II and III colon cancer receiving chemotherapy: an analysis of ACCENT adjuvant trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Oct 19; 103(20):1498-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  15. Glioma-associated oncogene family zinc finger 1 expression and metastasis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiation therapy (RTOG 9003). J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 01; 29(10):1326-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  16. Mammographic density and breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Oct 06; 96(19):1467-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  17. Is patient travel distance associated with survival on phase II clinical trials in oncology? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Sep 17; 95(18):1370-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  18. Tamoxifen, radiation therapy, or both for prevention of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after lumpectomy in women with invasive breast cancers of one centimeter or less. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Oct 15; 20(20):4141-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  19. Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) eight-year update of Protocol B-17: intraductal carcinoma. Cancer. 1999 Aug 01; 86(3):429-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.