The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Ross Milner to Risk Assessment

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Ross Milner has written about Risk Assessment.
Connection Strength

0.807
  1. Five-year outcomes for bell bottom, iliac branch endoprosthesis, and coil and cover approaches from the GREAT registry. J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun; 79(6):1369-1378.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  2. Right-sided Upper Extremity Access for Patients Undergoing Parallel Graft Placement during Endovascular Aortic Repair is Not Associated with Increased Neurologic Events When Compared with Left Upper Extremity Access. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 May; 73:37-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  3. Proposed classification of endoleaks after endovascular treatment of Stanford type-B aortic dissections. Vascular. 2019 Dec; 27(6):585-594.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  4. Interhospital Transfer of Ruptured AAA's for EVAR: Preposterous or Prudent? Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016 Aug; 50(6):455-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  5. Current debate on the role of embolic protection devices. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2012 Aug; 46(6):441-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  6. Comments regarding 'Best medical therapy or wishful thinking in carotid disease? a single centre audit in Germany'. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Apr; 41(4):507-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  7. Endovascular management of ruptured, mycotic abdominal aortic aneurysm. Am Surg. 2005 Jun; 71(6):515-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  8. Five-year outcomes of endovascular treatment for aortic dissection from the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment. J Vasc Surg. 2024 Oct; 80(4):1035-1044.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  9. The Effect of EndoAnchors on Aneurysm Sac Regression for Patients Treated With Infrarenal Endovascular Repair With Hostile Neck Anatomies: A Propensity Scored Analysis. J Endovasc Ther. 2024 06; 31(3):438-449.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  10. The Impact of Degenerative Connective Tissue Disorders on Outcomes Following Endovascular Aortic Intervention in the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment. Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Feb; 79:81-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  11. Contemporary Outcomes After Partial Resection of Infected Aortic Grafts. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct; 76:202-210.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  12. Excluder Stent Graft-Related Outcomes in Patients with Aortic Neck Anatomy Outside of Instructions For Use (IFU) within the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment (GREAT): Mid-term Follow-Up Results. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct; 76:222-231.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  13. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for symptomatic penetrating aortic ulcers and intramural hematomas is associated with poor outcomes. J Vasc Surg. 2021 07; 74(1):63-70.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  14. Gaussian Surface Curvature Mapping Indicating High Risk Type B Thoracic Aortic Dissections. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Jan; 70:171-180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  15. Gender Related Access Complications After TEVAR: Analysis from the Retrospective Multicentre Cohort GOREĀ® GREAT Registry Study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Aug; 60(2):203-209.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  16. Sex-Related Outcomes After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Within the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Aug; 67:242-253.e4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  17. Risk factors for late mortality after endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep; 52(3):549-54; discussion 555.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  18. Endovascular repair for diverse pathologies of the thoracic aorta: an initial decade of experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 May; 208(5):802-16; discussion 816-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  19. Secondary conversion of the Gore Excluder to operative abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Oct; 42(4):631-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.