The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Feng Li to Solitary Pulmonary Nodule

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Feng Li has written about Solitary Pulmonary Nodule.
Connection Strength

2.143
  1. Computer-aided nodule detection system: results in an unselected series of consecutive chest radiographs. Acad Radiol. 2015 Apr; 22(4):475-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.466
  2. Improved detection of subtle lung nodules by use of chest radiographs with bone suppression imaging: receiver operating characteristic analysis with and without localization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 May; 196(5):W535-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.361
  3. Improving radiologists' recommendations with computer-aided diagnosis for management of small nodules detected by CT. Acad Radiol. 2006 Aug; 13(8):943-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.260
  4. Radiologists' performance for differentiating benign from malignant lung nodules on high-resolution CT using computer-estimated likelihood of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Nov; 183(5):1209-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.230
  5. ROC Curve for Extremely Subtle Lung Nodules on Chest Radiographs Confirmed by CT Scan. Acad Radiol. 2016 Mar; 23(3):297-303.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  6. Usefulness of computer-aided diagnosis schemes for vertebral fractures and lung nodules on chest radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Jul; 191(1):260-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  7. An investigation of radiologists' perception of lesion similarity: observations with paired breast masses on mammograms and paired lung nodules on CT images. Acad Radiol. 2008 Jul; 15(7):887-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  8. Computerized detection of lung nodules in thin-section CT images by use of selective enhancement filters and an automated rule-based classifier. Acad Radiol. 2008 Feb; 15(2):165-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  9. Integrating PET and CT information to improve diagnostic accuracy for lung nodules: A semiautomatic computer-aided method. J Nucl Med. 2006 Jul; 47(7):1075-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  10. Computer-aided diagnosis in thoracic CT. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2005 Oct; 26(5):357-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  11. Computer-aided diagnostic scheme for distinction between benign and malignant nodules in thoracic low-dose CT by use of massive training artificial neural network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005 Sep; 24(9):1138-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  12. Evaluation of automated lung nodule detection on low-dose computed tomography scans from a lung cancer screening program(1). Acad Radiol. 2005 Mar; 12(3):337-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  13. Massive training artificial neural network (MTANN) for reduction of false positives in computerized detection of lung nodules in low-dose computed tomography. Med Phys. 2003 Jul; 30(7):1602-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  14. Automated lung nodule classification following automated nodule detection on CT: a serial approach. Med Phys. 2003 Jun; 30(6):1188-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  15. Computerized scheme for determination of the likelihood measure of malignancy for pulmonary nodules on low-dose CT images. Med Phys. 2003 Mar; 30(3):387-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  16. Lung cancer: performance of automated lung nodule detection applied to cancers missed in a CT screening program. Radiology. 2002 Dec; 225(3):685-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  17. Computer-aided diagnosis for the detection and classification of lung cancers on chest radiographs ROC analysis of radiologists' performance. Acad Radiol. 2006 Aug; 13(8):995-1003.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  18. Computerized scheme for automated detection of lung nodules in low-dose computed tomography images for lung cancer screening. Acad Radiol. 2004 Jun; 11(6):617-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.