The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Feng Li to Female

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Feng Li has written about Female.
Connection Strength

0.329
  1. Correlation of patient survival with clinical tumor measurements in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur Radiol. 2019 Jun; 29(6):2981-2988.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  2. Clinical significance of noncalcified lung nodules in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Sep; 159(2):265-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  3. Computer-aided nodule detection system: results in an unselected series of consecutive chest radiographs. Acad Radiol. 2015 Apr; 22(4):475-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  4. Improved detection of focal pneumonia by chest radiography with bone suppression imaging. Eur Radiol. 2012 Dec; 22(12):2729-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  5. Small lung cancers: improved detection by use of bone suppression imaging--comparison with dual-energy subtraction chest radiography. Radiology. 2011 Dec; 261(3):937-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  6. Improved detection of subtle lung nodules by use of chest radiographs with bone suppression imaging: receiver operating characteristic analysis with and without localization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 May; 196(5):W535-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  7. True detection versus "accidental" detection of small lung cancer by a computer-aided detection (CAD) program on chest radiographs. J Digit Imaging. 2010 Feb; 23(1):66-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  8. Improved detection of small lung cancers with dual-energy subtraction chest radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Apr; 190(4):886-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  9. Lung cancers missed on chest radiographs: results obtained with a commercial computer-aided detection program. Radiology. 2008 Jan; 246(1):273-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  10. Improving radiologists' recommendations with computer-aided diagnosis for management of small nodules detected by CT. Acad Radiol. 2006 Aug; 13(8):943-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  11. Computer-aided detection of peripheral lung cancers missed at CT: ROC analyses without and with localization. Radiology. 2005 Nov; 237(2):684-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  12. Radiologists' performance for differentiating benign from malignant lung nodules on high-resolution CT using computer-estimated likelihood of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Nov; 183(5):1209-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  13. Malignant versus benign nodules at CT screening for lung cancer: comparison of thin-section CT findings. Radiology. 2004 Dec; 233(3):793-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  14. Low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer in a general population: characteristics of cancer in non-smokers versus smokers. Acad Radiol. 2003 Sep; 10(9):1013-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  15. Lung cancers missed at low-dose helical CT screening in a general population: comparison of clinical, histopathologic, and imaging findings. Radiology. 2002 Dec; 225(3):673-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  16. Accuracy of the Vancouver Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model Compared With ThatĀ of Radiologists. Chest. 2019 07; 156(1):112-119.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  17. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT for the assessment of tumour response in malignant pleural mesothelioma: a pilot study. Eur Radiol. 2019 Feb; 29(2):682-688.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  18. Prognostic value of quantitative PET/CT in patients with a nonsmall cell lung cancer and another primary cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2017 Feb; 38(2):185-192.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  19. Quantitative evaluation of liver function with use of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2011 Sep; 260(3):727-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  20. Usefulness of computer-aided diagnosis schemes for vertebral fractures and lung nodules on chest radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Jul; 191(1):260-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  21. An investigation of radiologists' perception of lesion similarity: observations with paired breast masses on mammograms and paired lung nodules on CT images. Acad Radiol. 2008 Jul; 15(7):887-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  22. Computerized detection of vertebral compression fractures on lateral chest radiographs: preliminary results with a tool for early detection of osteoporosis. Med Phys. 2006 Dec; 33(12):4664-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  23. Integrating PET and CT information to improve diagnostic accuracy for lung nodules: A semiautomatic computer-aided method. J Nucl Med. 2006 Jul; 47(7):1075-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  24. Evaluation of automated lung nodule detection on low-dose computed tomography scans from a lung cancer screening program(1). Acad Radiol. 2005 Mar; 12(3):337-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  25. Effect of temporal subtraction images on radiologists' detection of lung cancer on CT: results of the observer performance study with use of film computed tomography images. Acad Radiol. 2004 Dec; 11(12):1337-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  26. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) for differential diagnosis of interstitial lung disease: results of a simulation test with actual clinical cases. Acad Radiol. 2004 Jan; 11(1):29-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  27. Automated lung nodule classification following automated nodule detection on CT: a serial approach. Med Phys. 2003 Jun; 30(6):1188-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  28. Computerized scheme for determination of the likelihood measure of malignancy for pulmonary nodules on low-dose CT images. Med Phys. 2003 Mar; 30(3):387-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  29. Lung cancer: performance of automated lung nodule detection applied to cancers missed in a CT screening program. Radiology. 2002 Dec; 225(3):685-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.